Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals
Objective. The academic multidisciplinary journals peer reviewed dedicated to the university extension (ReX) are relatively numerous in Brazil. Investigations on their impact are scarce. The aim of this research was to verify if the ReX present bibliometric differences in relation to other Brazilian...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Biblios |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/468 |
id |
doaj-dd6819cee3894599b17f0789592932cb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dd6819cee3894599b17f0789592932cb2020-11-24T21:12:02ZspaUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghBiblios1562-47302018-07-01071818910.5195/biblios.2018.468269Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicalsGeraldo Ceni Coelho0Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul - UFFSObjective. The academic multidisciplinary journals peer reviewed dedicated to the university extension (ReX) are relatively numerous in Brazil. Investigations on their impact are scarce. The aim of this research was to verify if the ReX present bibliometric differences in relation to other Brazilian multidisciplinary journals (RMulti). Method. Citation parameters were obtained from the search engine Google Scholar (GA) for journals of the two groups. In addition, the relation between the citation parameters and the Brazilian WebQualis classification was analyzed. Results. The impact factor based on the GA search engine (FGA) is widely variable and did not differ between the groups. The h5 index (GA) did not present a significant correlation with the FGA taking into account all the journals (r2 = 0.51, P = 0.0686). Among the RMulti there is a great correspondence between the higher WebQualis ranking and the FGA, and also between the median WebQualis ranking and the FGA. On the other hand, such relationship was not observed among the ReX. Conclusions. Considering their impact, it was concluded that the ReX is undervalued in the WebQualis.http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/468CientometriaExtensão universitáriaÍndice de HirschPeriódicos eletrônicosPós-graduação |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Geraldo Ceni Coelho |
spellingShingle |
Geraldo Ceni Coelho Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals Biblios Cientometria Extensão universitária Índice de Hirsch Periódicos eletrônicos Pós-graduação |
author_facet |
Geraldo Ceni Coelho |
author_sort |
Geraldo Ceni Coelho |
title |
Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals |
title_short |
Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals |
title_full |
Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals |
title_fullStr |
Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals |
title_sort |
impact assessment of brazilian university extension periodicals |
publisher |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
series |
Biblios |
issn |
1562-4730 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Objective. The academic multidisciplinary journals peer reviewed dedicated to the university extension (ReX) are relatively numerous in Brazil. Investigations on their impact are scarce. The aim of this research was to verify if the ReX present bibliometric differences in relation to other Brazilian multidisciplinary journals (RMulti).
Method. Citation parameters were obtained from the search engine Google Scholar (GA) for journals of the two groups. In addition, the relation between the citation parameters and the Brazilian WebQualis classification was analyzed.
Results. The impact factor based on the GA search engine (FGA) is widely variable and did not differ between the groups. The h5 index (GA) did not present a significant correlation with the FGA taking into account all the journals (r2 = 0.51, P = 0.0686). Among the RMulti there is a great correspondence between the higher WebQualis ranking and the FGA, and also between the median WebQualis ranking and the FGA. On the other hand, such relationship was not observed among the ReX.
Conclusions. Considering their impact, it was concluded that the ReX is undervalued in the WebQualis. |
topic |
Cientometria Extensão universitária Índice de Hirsch Periódicos eletrônicos Pós-graduação |
url |
http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/468 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT geraldocenicoelho impactassessmentofbrazilianuniversityextensionperiodicals |
_version_ |
1716751794253594624 |