Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals

Objective. The academic multidisciplinary journals peer reviewed dedicated to the university extension (ReX) are relatively numerous in Brazil. Investigations on their impact are scarce. The aim of this research was to verify if the ReX present bibliometric differences in relation to other Brazilian...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Geraldo Ceni Coelho
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2018-07-01
Series:Biblios
Subjects:
Online Access:http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/468
id doaj-dd6819cee3894599b17f0789592932cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd6819cee3894599b17f0789592932cb2020-11-24T21:12:02ZspaUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghBiblios1562-47302018-07-01071818910.5195/biblios.2018.468269Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicalsGeraldo Ceni Coelho0Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul - UFFSObjective. The academic multidisciplinary journals peer reviewed dedicated to the university extension (ReX) are relatively numerous in Brazil. Investigations on their impact are scarce. The aim of this research was to verify if the ReX present bibliometric differences in relation to other Brazilian multidisciplinary journals (RMulti). Method. Citation parameters were obtained from the search engine Google Scholar (GA) for journals of the two groups. In addition, the relation between the citation parameters and the Brazilian WebQualis classification was analyzed. Results. The impact factor based on the GA search engine (FGA) is widely variable and did not differ between the groups. The h5 index (GA) did not present a significant correlation with the FGA taking into account all the journals (r2 = 0.51, P = 0.0686). Among the RMulti there is a great correspondence between the higher WebQualis ranking and the FGA, and also between the median WebQualis ranking and the FGA. On the other hand, such relationship was not observed among the ReX. Conclusions. Considering their impact, it was concluded that the ReX is undervalued in the WebQualis.http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/468CientometriaExtensão universitáriaÍndice de HirschPeriódicos eletrônicosPós-graduação
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Geraldo Ceni Coelho
spellingShingle Geraldo Ceni Coelho
Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals
Biblios
Cientometria
Extensão universitária
Índice de Hirsch
Periódicos eletrônicos
Pós-graduação
author_facet Geraldo Ceni Coelho
author_sort Geraldo Ceni Coelho
title Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals
title_short Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals
title_full Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals
title_fullStr Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals
title_full_unstemmed Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals
title_sort impact assessment of brazilian university extension periodicals
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Biblios
issn 1562-4730
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Objective. The academic multidisciplinary journals peer reviewed dedicated to the university extension (ReX) are relatively numerous in Brazil. Investigations on their impact are scarce. The aim of this research was to verify if the ReX present bibliometric differences in relation to other Brazilian multidisciplinary journals (RMulti). Method. Citation parameters were obtained from the search engine Google Scholar (GA) for journals of the two groups. In addition, the relation between the citation parameters and the Brazilian WebQualis classification was analyzed. Results. The impact factor based on the GA search engine (FGA) is widely variable and did not differ between the groups. The h5 index (GA) did not present a significant correlation with the FGA taking into account all the journals (r2 = 0.51, P = 0.0686). Among the RMulti there is a great correspondence between the higher WebQualis ranking and the FGA, and also between the median WebQualis ranking and the FGA. On the other hand, such relationship was not observed among the ReX. Conclusions. Considering their impact, it was concluded that the ReX is undervalued in the WebQualis.
topic Cientometria
Extensão universitária
Índice de Hirsch
Periódicos eletrônicos
Pós-graduação
url http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/468
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldocenicoelho impactassessmentofbrazilianuniversityextensionperiodicals
_version_ 1716751794253594624