Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion

6 heifers of 4—9 months suffering from indigestion were given oat meal containing 80 mg of Aureomycin for 43 days. 6 similar heifers, serving as controls, were kept on the same diet and in the same shed. The average daily additional growth of the group receiving aureomycin was 285 g; the correspondi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. Haaranen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 1959-01-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71477
id doaj-dd62dfb02c414d399595ef85cfbfe02d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd62dfb02c414d399595ef85cfbfe02d2020-11-25T02:19:39ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18951959-01-01311Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestionS. Haaranen0Institute of Pharmacology, Veterinary College, Helsinki6 heifers of 4—9 months suffering from indigestion were given oat meal containing 80 mg of Aureomycin for 43 days. 6 similar heifers, serving as controls, were kept on the same diet and in the same shed. The average daily additional growth of the group receiving aureomycin was 285 g; the corresponding additional growth of the control groups was 108 g. The average increases for the test and control group, respectively, were: live weight 14.45 kg/6.48 kg, length 9.33 cm/3.33 cm, chest circumference 6.50 cm/4.33 cm, height of withers 1.8 cm/1.2 cm, pelvic breadth at the tubera coxae 1.7 cm/0.7 cm. Serum calcium and copper fell and potassium rose in the material as a whole. There were no statistically significant differences between the test and control groups except in Na, which rose in the test and fell the control groups. In view of the small size of each group and the nevertheless nearly significant difference in average weights (0.05 < P < 0.1), it would seem that aureomycin additive in the feed was beneficial for the heifers in these conditions. Economic consiferations will decide whether it is generally advisable to resort to aureomycin additive. The blood changes were regarded as being due to the transfer of the animals from the cold winter air indoors to a warm shed.https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71477
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Haaranen
spellingShingle S. Haaranen
Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion
Agricultural and Food Science
author_facet S. Haaranen
author_sort S. Haaranen
title Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion
title_short Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion
title_full Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion
title_fullStr Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion
title_full_unstemmed Aureomycin (Clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion
title_sort aureomycin (clortetracycline) feeding test on calves and heifers suffering from indigestion
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
series Agricultural and Food Science
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
publishDate 1959-01-01
description 6 heifers of 4—9 months suffering from indigestion were given oat meal containing 80 mg of Aureomycin for 43 days. 6 similar heifers, serving as controls, were kept on the same diet and in the same shed. The average daily additional growth of the group receiving aureomycin was 285 g; the corresponding additional growth of the control groups was 108 g. The average increases for the test and control group, respectively, were: live weight 14.45 kg/6.48 kg, length 9.33 cm/3.33 cm, chest circumference 6.50 cm/4.33 cm, height of withers 1.8 cm/1.2 cm, pelvic breadth at the tubera coxae 1.7 cm/0.7 cm. Serum calcium and copper fell and potassium rose in the material as a whole. There were no statistically significant differences between the test and control groups except in Na, which rose in the test and fell the control groups. In view of the small size of each group and the nevertheless nearly significant difference in average weights (0.05 < P < 0.1), it would seem that aureomycin additive in the feed was beneficial for the heifers in these conditions. Economic consiferations will decide whether it is generally advisable to resort to aureomycin additive. The blood changes were regarded as being due to the transfer of the animals from the cold winter air indoors to a warm shed.
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71477
work_keys_str_mv AT shaaranen aureomycinclortetracyclinefeedingtestoncalvesandheiferssufferingfromindigestion
_version_ 1724875177593929728