Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic Theodolites

Six simple electronic digital theodolites, three Sokkia instruments, a DT6, a DT5 and a DT2, a Topon DT20, a Zeiss ETh4 and a Leica T1600, were used to test measurement accuracy of horizontal distance and difference in elevation using stadia hairs etched on the telescope reticule of these new types...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdalla El Sadig Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2001-01-01
Series:Journal of King Saud University: Engineering Sciences
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018363918307232
id doaj-dd5bf128b13042e9b2e31408dd2d14ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd5bf128b13042e9b2e31408dd2d14ab2020-11-25T00:02:20ZengElsevierJournal of King Saud University: Engineering Sciences1018-36392001-01-011312536Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic TheodolitesAbdalla El Sadig Ali0Civil Engineering Department, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi ArabiaSix simple electronic digital theodolites, three Sokkia instruments, a DT6, a DT5 and a DT2, a Topon DT20, a Zeiss ETh4 and a Leica T1600, were used to test measurement accuracy of horizontal distance and difference in elevation using stadia hairs etched on the telescope reticule of these new types of theodolite. A geodetic test line was remeasured using these theodolites and standard deviations in horizontal distance and differences in elevation were then computed using first, the nominal values of scale factor K and additive constant C (namely 100 and 0 respectively) and secondly, the least squares-computed counterparts of these two parameters. In the first case, horizontal distance accuracy obtained ranged from ± 10mm in 100m with the Leica theodolite to ± 16mm in 100m with the Sokkia DT6 instrument. The vertical distance accuracy ranged from ± 9mm (in 100m) with the Leica T1600 to ± 15mm (in 100m) with the Topcon DT-20 theodolite. The corresponding values in the second case were ± 8mm to ± 13mm in the horizontal direction and ± 7mm to ± 14mm in height.This means that in both cases, “semi-electronic tacheometry” gives accuracy figures much better (two to three times) than conventional optical stadia techniques. These high accuracy figures are believed to be attributed partially to repeated measurements and partially to the improved design of modern electronic theodolites used in the test. This range of accuracy figures is commensurate with the requirements of a number of surveying, civil engineering, agricultural, environmental and other localized-type surveys where only modest to moderate positional accuracy figures are sought.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018363918307232
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdalla El Sadig Ali
spellingShingle Abdalla El Sadig Ali
Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic Theodolites
Journal of King Saud University: Engineering Sciences
author_facet Abdalla El Sadig Ali
author_sort Abdalla El Sadig Ali
title Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic Theodolites
title_short Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic Theodolites
title_full Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic Theodolites
title_fullStr Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic Theodolites
title_full_unstemmed Stadia Tacheometry with Electronic Theodolites
title_sort stadia tacheometry with electronic theodolites
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of King Saud University: Engineering Sciences
issn 1018-3639
publishDate 2001-01-01
description Six simple electronic digital theodolites, three Sokkia instruments, a DT6, a DT5 and a DT2, a Topon DT20, a Zeiss ETh4 and a Leica T1600, were used to test measurement accuracy of horizontal distance and difference in elevation using stadia hairs etched on the telescope reticule of these new types of theodolite. A geodetic test line was remeasured using these theodolites and standard deviations in horizontal distance and differences in elevation were then computed using first, the nominal values of scale factor K and additive constant C (namely 100 and 0 respectively) and secondly, the least squares-computed counterparts of these two parameters. In the first case, horizontal distance accuracy obtained ranged from ± 10mm in 100m with the Leica theodolite to ± 16mm in 100m with the Sokkia DT6 instrument. The vertical distance accuracy ranged from ± 9mm (in 100m) with the Leica T1600 to ± 15mm (in 100m) with the Topcon DT-20 theodolite. The corresponding values in the second case were ± 8mm to ± 13mm in the horizontal direction and ± 7mm to ± 14mm in height.This means that in both cases, “semi-electronic tacheometry” gives accuracy figures much better (two to three times) than conventional optical stadia techniques. These high accuracy figures are believed to be attributed partially to repeated measurements and partially to the improved design of modern electronic theodolites used in the test. This range of accuracy figures is commensurate with the requirements of a number of surveying, civil engineering, agricultural, environmental and other localized-type surveys where only modest to moderate positional accuracy figures are sought.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018363918307232
work_keys_str_mv AT abdallaelsadigali stadiatacheometrywithelectronictheodolites
_version_ 1725438263481597952