Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania

Objectives Trauma registries are an integral part of a well-organised trauma system. Tanzania, like many low and middle-income countries, does not have a trauma registry. We describe the development, structure, implementation and impact of a context appropriate standardised trauma form based on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juma A Mfinanga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e038022.full
id doaj-dd4d1e74684b42e79c65c067125ef2e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd4d1e74684b42e79c65c067125ef2e32021-05-06T09:32:31ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-10-01101010.1136/bmjopen-2020-038022Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from TanzaniaJuma A Mfinanga0Emergency Medicine, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es salaam, United Republic of TanzaniaObjectives Trauma registries are an integral part of a well-organised trauma system. Tanzania, like many low and middle-income countries, does not have a trauma registry. We describe the development, structure, implementation and impact of a context appropriate standardised trauma form based on the adaptation of the WHO Data Set for Injury (DSI), for clinical documentation and use in a national trauma registry.Setting Our study was conducted in emergency units of five regional referral hospitals in Tanzania.Procedures Mixed methods participatory action research was employed. After an assessment of baseline trauma documentation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposefully selected sample of 33 healthcare providers from all participating hospitals to understand, develop, pilot and implement a standardised trauma form. We compared the number and types of variables captured before and after the form was implemented.Outcomes Change in proportion of variables of DSI captured after implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form.Results Piloting and feedback informed the development of a context appropriate standardised trauma documentation paper form with carbonless copy that could be used as both the clinical chart and data capture. Among 721 patients (seen by 21 clinicians) during the initial 30-day pilot, overall variable capture was 86.4% of required variables. After modifications of the form and training of healthcare providers, the form was implemented for 7 months, during which the capture improved to 96.3% among 6302 patients (seen by 31 clinicians). The providers reported the form was user-friendly, resulted in less time documenting, and served as a guide to managing trauma patients.Conclusions The development and implementation of a contextually appropriate, standardised trauma form were successful, yielding increased capture rates of injury variables. This system will facilitate expansion of the trauma registry across the country and inform similar initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e038022.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juma A Mfinanga
spellingShingle Juma A Mfinanga
Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania
BMJ Open
author_facet Juma A Mfinanga
author_sort Juma A Mfinanga
title Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania
title_short Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania
title_full Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania
title_fullStr Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania
title_sort development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from tanzania
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Objectives Trauma registries are an integral part of a well-organised trauma system. Tanzania, like many low and middle-income countries, does not have a trauma registry. We describe the development, structure, implementation and impact of a context appropriate standardised trauma form based on the adaptation of the WHO Data Set for Injury (DSI), for clinical documentation and use in a national trauma registry.Setting Our study was conducted in emergency units of five regional referral hospitals in Tanzania.Procedures Mixed methods participatory action research was employed. After an assessment of baseline trauma documentation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposefully selected sample of 33 healthcare providers from all participating hospitals to understand, develop, pilot and implement a standardised trauma form. We compared the number and types of variables captured before and after the form was implemented.Outcomes Change in proportion of variables of DSI captured after implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form.Results Piloting and feedback informed the development of a context appropriate standardised trauma documentation paper form with carbonless copy that could be used as both the clinical chart and data capture. Among 721 patients (seen by 21 clinicians) during the initial 30-day pilot, overall variable capture was 86.4% of required variables. After modifications of the form and training of healthcare providers, the form was implemented for 7 months, during which the capture improved to 96.3% among 6302 patients (seen by 31 clinicians). The providers reported the form was user-friendly, resulted in less time documenting, and served as a guide to managing trauma patients.Conclusions The development and implementation of a contextually appropriate, standardised trauma form were successful, yielding increased capture rates of injury variables. This system will facilitate expansion of the trauma registry across the country and inform similar initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e038022.full
work_keys_str_mv AT jumaamfinanga developmentandpilotimplementationofastandardisedtraumadocumentationformtoinformanationaltraumaregistryinalowresourcesettinglessonsfromtanzania
_version_ 1721456989116039168