Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey
BackgroundIn an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e19745 |
id |
doaj-dd354b83644149be8089eeee9b0b9320 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dd354b83644149be8089eeee9b0b93202021-04-02T18:56:33ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712020-08-01228e1974510.2196/19745Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National SurveyPeine, ArnePaffenholz, PiaMartin, LukasDohmen, SandraMarx, GernotLoosen, Sven H BackgroundIn an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are already being used, while new approaches are rapidly being developed in response to the crisis. However, the extent of the current implementation within different health care settings, the user’s acceptance and perception, as well as the hindering technical and regulatory obstacles remain unclear. ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to assess the current status quo of the availability and routine use of telemedical solutions, user acceptance, and the subjectively perceived burdens on telemedical approaches. Furthermore, we seek to assess the perception of public information quality among professional groups and their preferred communication channels. MethodsA national online survey was conducted on 14 consecutive days in March and April 2020, and distributed to doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in the German language. ResultsA total of 2827 medical professionals participated in the study. Doctors accounted for 65.6% (n=1855) of the professionals, 29.5% (n=833) were nursing staff, and 4.9% (n=139) were identified as others such as therapeutic staff. A majority of participants rated the significance of telemedicine within the crisis as high (1065/2730, 39%) or neutral (n=720, 26.4%); however, there were significant differences between doctors and nurses (P=.01) as well as between the stationary sector compared to the ambulatory sector (P<.001). Telemedicine was already in routine use for 19.6% (532/2711) of German health care providers and in partial use for 40.2% (n=1090). Participants working in private practices (239/594, 40.2%) or private clinics (23/59, 39.0%) experienced less regulatory or technical obstacles compared to university hospitals (586/1190, 49.2%). A majority of doctors rated the public information quality on COVID-19 as good (942/1855, 50.8%) or very good (213/1855, 11.5%); nurses rated the quality of public information significantly lower (P<.001). Participant’s age negatively correlated with the perception of telemedicine’s significance (ρ=–0.23; P<.001). ConclusionsTelemedicine has a broad acceptance among German medical professionals. However, to establish telemedical structures within routine care, technical and regulatory burdens must be overcome.https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e19745 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peine, Arne Paffenholz, Pia Martin, Lukas Dohmen, Sandra Marx, Gernot Loosen, Sven H |
spellingShingle |
Peine, Arne Paffenholz, Pia Martin, Lukas Dohmen, Sandra Marx, Gernot Loosen, Sven H Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey Journal of Medical Internet Research |
author_facet |
Peine, Arne Paffenholz, Pia Martin, Lukas Dohmen, Sandra Marx, Gernot Loosen, Sven H |
author_sort |
Peine, Arne |
title |
Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey |
title_short |
Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey |
title_full |
Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey |
title_fullStr |
Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey |
title_sort |
telemedicine in germany during the covid-19 pandemic: multi-professional national survey |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Internet Research |
issn |
1438-8871 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
BackgroundIn an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are already being used, while new approaches are rapidly being developed in response to the crisis. However, the extent of the current implementation within different health care settings, the user’s acceptance and perception, as well as the hindering technical and regulatory obstacles remain unclear.
ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to assess the current status quo of the availability and routine use of telemedical solutions, user acceptance, and the subjectively perceived burdens on telemedical approaches. Furthermore, we seek to assess the perception of public information quality among professional groups and their preferred communication channels.
MethodsA national online survey was conducted on 14 consecutive days in March and April 2020, and distributed to doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in the German language.
ResultsA total of 2827 medical professionals participated in the study. Doctors accounted for 65.6% (n=1855) of the professionals, 29.5% (n=833) were nursing staff, and 4.9% (n=139) were identified as others such as therapeutic staff. A majority of participants rated the significance of telemedicine within the crisis as high (1065/2730, 39%) or neutral (n=720, 26.4%); however, there were significant differences between doctors and nurses (P=.01) as well as between the stationary sector compared to the ambulatory sector (P<.001). Telemedicine was already in routine use for 19.6% (532/2711) of German health care providers and in partial use for 40.2% (n=1090). Participants working in private practices (239/594, 40.2%) or private clinics (23/59, 39.0%) experienced less regulatory or technical obstacles compared to university hospitals (586/1190, 49.2%). A majority of doctors rated the public information quality on COVID-19 as good (942/1855, 50.8%) or very good (213/1855, 11.5%); nurses rated the quality of public information significantly lower (P<.001). Participant’s age negatively correlated with the perception of telemedicine’s significance (ρ=–0.23; P<.001).
ConclusionsTelemedicine has a broad acceptance among German medical professionals. However, to establish telemedical structures within routine care, technical and regulatory burdens must be overcome. |
url |
https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e19745 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peinearne telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey AT paffenholzpia telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey AT martinlukas telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey AT dohmensandra telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey AT marxgernot telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey AT loosensvenh telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey |
_version_ |
1721550431761465344 |