Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey

BackgroundIn an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peine, Arne, Paffenholz, Pia, Martin, Lukas, Dohmen, Sandra, Marx, Gernot, Loosen, Sven H
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e19745
id doaj-dd354b83644149be8089eeee9b0b9320
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd354b83644149be8089eeee9b0b93202021-04-02T18:56:33ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712020-08-01228e1974510.2196/19745Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National SurveyPeine, ArnePaffenholz, PiaMartin, LukasDohmen, SandraMarx, GernotLoosen, Sven H BackgroundIn an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are already being used, while new approaches are rapidly being developed in response to the crisis. However, the extent of the current implementation within different health care settings, the user’s acceptance and perception, as well as the hindering technical and regulatory obstacles remain unclear. ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to assess the current status quo of the availability and routine use of telemedical solutions, user acceptance, and the subjectively perceived burdens on telemedical approaches. Furthermore, we seek to assess the perception of public information quality among professional groups and their preferred communication channels. MethodsA national online survey was conducted on 14 consecutive days in March and April 2020, and distributed to doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in the German language. ResultsA total of 2827 medical professionals participated in the study. Doctors accounted for 65.6% (n=1855) of the professionals, 29.5% (n=833) were nursing staff, and 4.9% (n=139) were identified as others such as therapeutic staff. A majority of participants rated the significance of telemedicine within the crisis as high (1065/2730, 39%) or neutral (n=720, 26.4%); however, there were significant differences between doctors and nurses (P=.01) as well as between the stationary sector compared to the ambulatory sector (P<.001). Telemedicine was already in routine use for 19.6% (532/2711) of German health care providers and in partial use for 40.2% (n=1090). Participants working in private practices (239/594, 40.2%) or private clinics (23/59, 39.0%) experienced less regulatory or technical obstacles compared to university hospitals (586/1190, 49.2%). A majority of doctors rated the public information quality on COVID-19 as good (942/1855, 50.8%) or very good (213/1855, 11.5%); nurses rated the quality of public information significantly lower (P<.001). Participant’s age negatively correlated with the perception of telemedicine’s significance (ρ=–0.23; P<.001). ConclusionsTelemedicine has a broad acceptance among German medical professionals. However, to establish telemedical structures within routine care, technical and regulatory burdens must be overcome.https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e19745
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peine, Arne
Paffenholz, Pia
Martin, Lukas
Dohmen, Sandra
Marx, Gernot
Loosen, Sven H
spellingShingle Peine, Arne
Paffenholz, Pia
Martin, Lukas
Dohmen, Sandra
Marx, Gernot
Loosen, Sven H
Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey
Journal of Medical Internet Research
author_facet Peine, Arne
Paffenholz, Pia
Martin, Lukas
Dohmen, Sandra
Marx, Gernot
Loosen, Sven H
author_sort Peine, Arne
title Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey
title_short Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey
title_full Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey
title_fullStr Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey
title_sort telemedicine in germany during the covid-19 pandemic: multi-professional national survey
publisher JMIR Publications
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
issn 1438-8871
publishDate 2020-08-01
description BackgroundIn an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are already being used, while new approaches are rapidly being developed in response to the crisis. However, the extent of the current implementation within different health care settings, the user’s acceptance and perception, as well as the hindering technical and regulatory obstacles remain unclear. ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to assess the current status quo of the availability and routine use of telemedical solutions, user acceptance, and the subjectively perceived burdens on telemedical approaches. Furthermore, we seek to assess the perception of public information quality among professional groups and their preferred communication channels. MethodsA national online survey was conducted on 14 consecutive days in March and April 2020, and distributed to doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in the German language. ResultsA total of 2827 medical professionals participated in the study. Doctors accounted for 65.6% (n=1855) of the professionals, 29.5% (n=833) were nursing staff, and 4.9% (n=139) were identified as others such as therapeutic staff. A majority of participants rated the significance of telemedicine within the crisis as high (1065/2730, 39%) or neutral (n=720, 26.4%); however, there were significant differences between doctors and nurses (P=.01) as well as between the stationary sector compared to the ambulatory sector (P<.001). Telemedicine was already in routine use for 19.6% (532/2711) of German health care providers and in partial use for 40.2% (n=1090). Participants working in private practices (239/594, 40.2%) or private clinics (23/59, 39.0%) experienced less regulatory or technical obstacles compared to university hospitals (586/1190, 49.2%). A majority of doctors rated the public information quality on COVID-19 as good (942/1855, 50.8%) or very good (213/1855, 11.5%); nurses rated the quality of public information significantly lower (P<.001). Participant’s age negatively correlated with the perception of telemedicine’s significance (ρ=–0.23; P<.001). ConclusionsTelemedicine has a broad acceptance among German medical professionals. However, to establish telemedical structures within routine care, technical and regulatory burdens must be overcome.
url https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e19745
work_keys_str_mv AT peinearne telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey
AT paffenholzpia telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey
AT martinlukas telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey
AT dohmensandra telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey
AT marxgernot telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey
AT loosensvenh telemedicineingermanyduringthecovid19pandemicmultiprofessionalnationalsurvey
_version_ 1721550431761465344