Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
There is a worldwide claim by environmentalists and scientists that environmental policy usually lacks support based on scientific evidence. In this work we studied the gap between science and conservation actions in Brazil. We mapped scientific literature on conservation and conducted online survey...
Main Authors: | Manoela Karam-Gemael, Rafael Loyola, Jerry Penha, Thiago Izzo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300324 |
Similar Items
-
Integrating agricultural expansion into conservation biogeography: conflicts and priorities
by: Ricardo Dobrovolski
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Conservation cost‐effectiveness: a review of the evidence base
by: Thomas Pienkowski, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Reward for Nature Conservation: Tree Kangaroos, Cars and Scientists
by: Soukup Martin
Published: (2012-11-01) -
I Am a Compassionate Conservation Welfare Scientist: Considering the Theoretical and Practical Differences Between Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare
by: Ngaio J. Beausoleil
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID‐19 environmental science and a fit‐for‐purpose evidence base
by: Andrew N. Kadykalo, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)