Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
There is a worldwide claim by environmentalists and scientists that environmental policy usually lacks support based on scientific evidence. In this work we studied the gap between science and conservation actions in Brazil. We mapped scientific literature on conservation and conducted online survey...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300324 |
id |
doaj-dd2936ff3508498b907d9ad25a9ad55c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dd2936ff3508498b907d9ad25a9ad55c2020-12-31T04:43:31ZengElsevierPerspectives in Ecology and Conservation2530-06442018-07-01163125132Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in BrazilManoela Karam-Gemael0Rafael Loyola1Jerry Penha2Thiago Izzo3Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Corrêa da Costa, s/n, CEP: 78060-900, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil; Corresponding author.Laboratório de Biogeografia da Conservação, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança, s/n, Campus Samambaia, CEP: 74690-900, Goiânia, Goiás, BrazilDepartamento de Botânica e Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Corrêa da Costa, s/n, CEP: 78060-900, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, BrazilDepartamento de Botânica e Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Corrêa da Costa, s/n, CEP: 78060-900, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, BrazilThere is a worldwide claim by environmentalists and scientists that environmental policy usually lacks support based on scientific evidence. In this work we studied the gap between science and conservation actions in Brazil. We mapped scientific literature on conservation and conducted online surveys with science experts on biodiversity and policymakers working on a federal sphere. Our results show that environmental issues considered as priority for policymakers did not relate to those suggested by scientists and the peer-reviewed literature. According to policymakers, the main barriers to access scientific literature were time available to read papers, difficulty in understanding technical language and reading in English. Our results confirm that, in general, scientific knowledge is not being sufficiently applied to support policies in Brazil. Both scientists and policymakers are responsible for improving communication between their institutions: researchers need to know in advance what are professional policymakers’ needs and direct their research towards answering policy-related questions; and policymakers need that scientific evidences be available in accessible language and up to date. We recommend the development of science communication departments at all governmental levels and the establishment of evidence-based research groups and tools. Our findings help to explain the mismatch between science and policy in Brazil and represent a warning to everyone engaged in biodiversity conservation worldwide.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300324Science communicationEvidence-based conservationConservation policyDecision makingEnvironmental management |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Manoela Karam-Gemael Rafael Loyola Jerry Penha Thiago Izzo |
spellingShingle |
Manoela Karam-Gemael Rafael Loyola Jerry Penha Thiago Izzo Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Science communication Evidence-based conservation Conservation policy Decision making Environmental management |
author_facet |
Manoela Karam-Gemael Rafael Loyola Jerry Penha Thiago Izzo |
author_sort |
Manoela Karam-Gemael |
title |
Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil |
title_short |
Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil |
title_full |
Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil |
title_sort |
poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in brazil |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation |
issn |
2530-0644 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
There is a worldwide claim by environmentalists and scientists that environmental policy usually lacks support based on scientific evidence. In this work we studied the gap between science and conservation actions in Brazil. We mapped scientific literature on conservation and conducted online surveys with science experts on biodiversity and policymakers working on a federal sphere. Our results show that environmental issues considered as priority for policymakers did not relate to those suggested by scientists and the peer-reviewed literature. According to policymakers, the main barriers to access scientific literature were time available to read papers, difficulty in understanding technical language and reading in English. Our results confirm that, in general, scientific knowledge is not being sufficiently applied to support policies in Brazil. Both scientists and policymakers are responsible for improving communication between their institutions: researchers need to know in advance what are professional policymakers’ needs and direct their research towards answering policy-related questions; and policymakers need that scientific evidences be available in accessible language and up to date. We recommend the development of science communication departments at all governmental levels and the establishment of evidence-based research groups and tools. Our findings help to explain the mismatch between science and policy in Brazil and represent a warning to everyone engaged in biodiversity conservation worldwide. |
topic |
Science communication Evidence-based conservation Conservation policy Decision making Environmental management |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300324 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manoelakaramgemael pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil AT rafaelloyola pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil AT jerrypenha pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil AT thiagoizzo pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil |
_version_ |
1724365041344446464 |