Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil

There is a worldwide claim by environmentalists and scientists that environmental policy usually lacks support based on scientific evidence. In this work we studied the gap between science and conservation actions in Brazil. We mapped scientific literature on conservation and conducted online survey...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manoela Karam-Gemael, Rafael Loyola, Jerry Penha, Thiago Izzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-07-01
Series:Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300324
id doaj-dd2936ff3508498b907d9ad25a9ad55c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd2936ff3508498b907d9ad25a9ad55c2020-12-31T04:43:31ZengElsevierPerspectives in Ecology and Conservation2530-06442018-07-01163125132Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in BrazilManoela Karam-Gemael0Rafael Loyola1Jerry Penha2Thiago Izzo3Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Corrêa da Costa, s/n, CEP: 78060-900, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil; Corresponding author.Laboratório de Biogeografia da Conservação, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança, s/n, Campus Samambaia, CEP: 74690-900, Goiânia, Goiás, BrazilDepartamento de Botânica e Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Corrêa da Costa, s/n, CEP: 78060-900, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, BrazilDepartamento de Botânica e Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Avenida Fernando Corrêa da Costa, s/n, CEP: 78060-900, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, BrazilThere is a worldwide claim by environmentalists and scientists that environmental policy usually lacks support based on scientific evidence. In this work we studied the gap between science and conservation actions in Brazil. We mapped scientific literature on conservation and conducted online surveys with science experts on biodiversity and policymakers working on a federal sphere. Our results show that environmental issues considered as priority for policymakers did not relate to those suggested by scientists and the peer-reviewed literature. According to policymakers, the main barriers to access scientific literature were time available to read papers, difficulty in understanding technical language and reading in English. Our results confirm that, in general, scientific knowledge is not being sufficiently applied to support policies in Brazil. Both scientists and policymakers are responsible for improving communication between their institutions: researchers need to know in advance what are professional policymakers’ needs and direct their research towards answering policy-related questions; and policymakers need that scientific evidences be available in accessible language and up to date. We recommend the development of science communication departments at all governmental levels and the establishment of evidence-based research groups and tools. Our findings help to explain the mismatch between science and policy in Brazil and represent a warning to everyone engaged in biodiversity conservation worldwide.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300324Science communicationEvidence-based conservationConservation policyDecision makingEnvironmental management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manoela Karam-Gemael
Rafael Loyola
Jerry Penha
Thiago Izzo
spellingShingle Manoela Karam-Gemael
Rafael Loyola
Jerry Penha
Thiago Izzo
Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Science communication
Evidence-based conservation
Conservation policy
Decision making
Environmental management
author_facet Manoela Karam-Gemael
Rafael Loyola
Jerry Penha
Thiago Izzo
author_sort Manoela Karam-Gemael
title Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
title_short Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
title_full Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
title_fullStr Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil
title_sort poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in brazil
publisher Elsevier
series Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
issn 2530-0644
publishDate 2018-07-01
description There is a worldwide claim by environmentalists and scientists that environmental policy usually lacks support based on scientific evidence. In this work we studied the gap between science and conservation actions in Brazil. We mapped scientific literature on conservation and conducted online surveys with science experts on biodiversity and policymakers working on a federal sphere. Our results show that environmental issues considered as priority for policymakers did not relate to those suggested by scientists and the peer-reviewed literature. According to policymakers, the main barriers to access scientific literature were time available to read papers, difficulty in understanding technical language and reading in English. Our results confirm that, in general, scientific knowledge is not being sufficiently applied to support policies in Brazil. Both scientists and policymakers are responsible for improving communication between their institutions: researchers need to know in advance what are professional policymakers’ needs and direct their research towards answering policy-related questions; and policymakers need that scientific evidences be available in accessible language and up to date. We recommend the development of science communication departments at all governmental levels and the establishment of evidence-based research groups and tools. Our findings help to explain the mismatch between science and policy in Brazil and represent a warning to everyone engaged in biodiversity conservation worldwide.
topic Science communication
Evidence-based conservation
Conservation policy
Decision making
Environmental management
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300324
work_keys_str_mv AT manoelakaramgemael pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil
AT rafaelloyola pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil
AT jerrypenha pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil
AT thiagoizzo pooralignmentofprioritiesbetweenscientistsandpolicymakershighlightstheneedforevidenceinformedconservationinbrazil
_version_ 1724365041344446464