Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?

Supplier efforts regarding product quality are an important issue in outsourcing and play a critical role in a manufacturer’s choice of sourcing strategy. Consider a manufacturer that wants to outsource the manufacturing of two substitute products to external suppliers. This paper studies the strate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jingxian Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3040343
id doaj-dd1cc7cd5f004f268de5efc244881eae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd1cc7cd5f004f268de5efc244881eae2020-11-25T01:10:34ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472016-01-01201610.1155/2016/30403433040343Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?Jingxian Chen0School of Business, Nantong University, 9 Seyuan Road, Nantong 226019, ChinaSupplier efforts regarding product quality are an important issue in outsourcing and play a critical role in a manufacturer’s choice of sourcing strategy. Consider a manufacturer that wants to outsource the manufacturing of two substitute products to external suppliers. This paper studies the strategic interactions under two sourcing strategies: single and dual sourcing. A four-stage noncooperative game model is established to describe each member’s decisions. We further propose four decision scenarios: single sourcing with and without manufacturer quality investment sharing and dual sourcing when suppliers cooperate or do not cooperate on quality decisions. By the backward induction approach, we obtain analytical equilibrium solutions for each decision scenario. By comparing each pair of equilibrium profiles, we find that an appropriate proportion of quality investment sharing by the manufacturer can enable a cooperating strategy with a single supplier to be the dominant strategy. When the manufacturer does not want to share or does not want to share a relatively large portion of its supplier’s quality investment, it will always prefer to develop two competing suppliers when the cost of dual sourcing is sufficiently low. However, dual sourcing can be extremely risky for the manufacturer because the suppliers could provide a relatively low product quality level by cooperating on the quality decision to extract the manufacturer’s profit.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3040343
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jingxian Chen
spellingShingle Jingxian Chen
Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Jingxian Chen
author_sort Jingxian Chen
title Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?
title_short Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?
title_full Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?
title_fullStr Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?
title_full_unstemmed Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?
title_sort sourcing for quality: cooperating with a single supplier or developing two competing suppliers?
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Supplier efforts regarding product quality are an important issue in outsourcing and play a critical role in a manufacturer’s choice of sourcing strategy. Consider a manufacturer that wants to outsource the manufacturing of two substitute products to external suppliers. This paper studies the strategic interactions under two sourcing strategies: single and dual sourcing. A four-stage noncooperative game model is established to describe each member’s decisions. We further propose four decision scenarios: single sourcing with and without manufacturer quality investment sharing and dual sourcing when suppliers cooperate or do not cooperate on quality decisions. By the backward induction approach, we obtain analytical equilibrium solutions for each decision scenario. By comparing each pair of equilibrium profiles, we find that an appropriate proportion of quality investment sharing by the manufacturer can enable a cooperating strategy with a single supplier to be the dominant strategy. When the manufacturer does not want to share or does not want to share a relatively large portion of its supplier’s quality investment, it will always prefer to develop two competing suppliers when the cost of dual sourcing is sufficiently low. However, dual sourcing can be extremely risky for the manufacturer because the suppliers could provide a relatively low product quality level by cooperating on the quality decision to extract the manufacturer’s profit.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3040343
work_keys_str_mv AT jingxianchen sourcingforqualitycooperatingwithasinglesupplierordevelopingtwocompetingsuppliers
_version_ 1725173941919547392