Relating Nationalism and Political Theory
This paper discusses the limitations of the liberal model of multiculturalism as a conceptual framework suitable for thinking about justice in complex ethnoreligious national contestations by introducing a wide spectrum of its critics. Liberal formulations of multiculturalism, it is argued, do not c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Journal of Social Science Research and Review
2019-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Social Science Research and Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ijssrr.com/journal/article/view/16 |
id |
doaj-dd07d18ea6bc4fe4b2608d37a7280f06 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dd07d18ea6bc4fe4b2608d37a7280f062021-08-19T17:51:59ZengInternational Journal of Social Science Research and ReviewInternational Journal of Social Science Research and Review2700-24972700-24972019-03-012181410.47814/ijssrr.v2i1.1616Relating Nationalism and Political TheoryKalbfleisch Ramsay0Department of Political Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, South AfricaThis paper discusses the limitations of the liberal model of multiculturalism as a conceptual framework suitable for thinking about justice in complex ethnoreligious national contestations by introducing a wide spectrum of its critics. Liberal formulations of multiculturalism, it is argued, do not challenge the underpinning power infrastructure of the polity nor the normative definition of belonging as articulated by the so-called 'majority culture'. Conversely, the polycentric tactic articulated by Nancy Fraser indeed offers the possibility for a counter hegemonic reimagining of the power arrangements. But it does not address how religion may partake in such introspective rethinking. This process does not imply merely a power reconfiguration. It also entails a reassessment and rethinking of the legitimizing ethos of the nation.https://ijssrr.com/journal/article/view/16nationalismpolitical theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kalbfleisch Ramsay |
spellingShingle |
Kalbfleisch Ramsay Relating Nationalism and Political Theory International Journal of Social Science Research and Review nationalism political theory |
author_facet |
Kalbfleisch Ramsay |
author_sort |
Kalbfleisch Ramsay |
title |
Relating Nationalism and Political Theory |
title_short |
Relating Nationalism and Political Theory |
title_full |
Relating Nationalism and Political Theory |
title_fullStr |
Relating Nationalism and Political Theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relating Nationalism and Political Theory |
title_sort |
relating nationalism and political theory |
publisher |
International Journal of Social Science Research and Review |
series |
International Journal of Social Science Research and Review |
issn |
2700-2497 2700-2497 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
This paper discusses the limitations of the liberal model of multiculturalism as a conceptual framework suitable for thinking about justice in complex ethnoreligious national contestations by introducing a wide spectrum of its critics. Liberal formulations of multiculturalism, it is argued, do not challenge the underpinning power infrastructure of the polity nor the normative definition of belonging as articulated by the so-called 'majority culture'. Conversely, the polycentric tactic articulated by Nancy Fraser indeed offers the possibility for a counter hegemonic reimagining of the power arrangements. But it does not address how religion may partake in such introspective rethinking. This process does not imply merely a power reconfiguration. It also entails a reassessment and rethinking of the legitimizing ethos of the nation. |
topic |
nationalism political theory |
url |
https://ijssrr.com/journal/article/view/16 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kalbfleischramsay relatingnationalismandpoliticaltheory |
_version_ |
1721201920150863872 |