STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES

STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES

Abstract: All post-soviet states face stateness problems, that is why it’s important to reveal their preconditions. The article distinguishes the main factors of state formation in the post-USSR states determining the similarities and differences in the governance problems, the effectiveness of stat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. Yu. Meleshkina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jurist, Publishing Group 2015-07-01
Series:Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika
Subjects:
stateness
post-soviet states
post-imperial state
post-imperial transition
statebuilding
Online Access:https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/133
id doaj-dcec63563d1f4b24b1b40d053d973ecf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dcec63563d1f4b24b1b40d053d973ecf2021-07-29T08:10:09ZengJurist, Publishing GroupSravnitelʹnaâ Politika2221-32792412-49902015-07-0131(7)11813210.18611/2221-3279-2012-3-1(7)-118-132121STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIESE. Yu. Meleshkina0МГИМО (У) МИД России; ИНИОН РАНAbstract: All post-soviet states face stateness problems, that is why it’s important to reveal their preconditions. The article distinguishes the main factors of state formation in the post-USSR states determining the similarities and differences in the governance problems, the effectiveness of state institutions and rational use of resources. The similarities are explained through the specific nature of post-imperial transition with problems of state and nation-building on top. The differences are determined by the following factors: inclusion into international structures, the number of competing internal and external centers and the degree of tension between centers and cultural-ethnic, regional and economic peripheries, the institutional legacies, the traditions of statehood, resource presence and the degree of political regime consolidation.https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/133statenesspost-soviet statespost-imperial statepost-imperial transitionstatebuilding
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Yu. Meleshkina
spellingShingle E. Yu. Meleshkina
STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES
Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika
stateness
post-soviet states
post-imperial state
post-imperial transition
statebuilding
author_facet E. Yu. Meleshkina
author_sort E. Yu. Meleshkina
title STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES
title_short STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES
title_full STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES
title_fullStr STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES
title_full_unstemmed STATENESS OF POSTSOVIET TERRITORIAL POLITIES
title_sort stateness of postsoviet territorial polities
publisher Jurist, Publishing Group
series Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika
issn 2221-3279
2412-4990
publishDate 2015-07-01
description Abstract: All post-soviet states face stateness problems, that is why it’s important to reveal their preconditions. The article distinguishes the main factors of state formation in the post-USSR states determining the similarities and differences in the governance problems, the effectiveness of state institutions and rational use of resources. The similarities are explained through the specific nature of post-imperial transition with problems of state and nation-building on top. The differences are determined by the following factors: inclusion into international structures, the number of competing internal and external centers and the degree of tension between centers and cultural-ethnic, regional and economic peripheries, the institutional legacies, the traditions of statehood, resource presence and the degree of political regime consolidation.
topic stateness
post-soviet states
post-imperial state
post-imperial transition
statebuilding
url https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/133
work_keys_str_mv AT eyumeleshkina statenessofpostsovietterritorialpolities
_version_ 1721257729503264768

Similar Items