Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
The recent introduction of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) as a diagnostic category may cause negative social reactions (i.e. public stigma). Vignette experiments demonstrate that persons with both PGD symptoms and a PGD diagnosis elicit more public stigma than persons who experience integrated grief...
Main Authors: | Judith Gonschor, Maarten C Eisma, Antonia Barke, Bettina K Doering |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237021 |
Similar Items
-
Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
by: Judith Gonschor, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS)
by: Bettina K. Doering, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder Criteria: Turning Challenges Into Opportunities With Multiverse Analyses
by: Maarten C. Eisma, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Response to: Prolonged grief disorder for ICD-11: the primacy of clinical utility and international applicability
by: Maarten C. Eisma, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form
by: Bettina K. Doering, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)