Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing

Background: Removing dental plaque is important to maintain a good oral hygiene and prevent periodontal disease; this could not be accomplished by the use of toothbrush alone, it needs the help of interdental aids or intra-oral irrigator devices. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hadeel M Akram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad 2015-09-01
Series:Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
Online Access:https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/812
id doaj-dcb4f995e17647e39e52124caafd8d30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dcb4f995e17647e39e52124caafd8d302021-09-02T19:43:56ZengCollege of Dentistry/ University of BaghdadJournal of Baghdad College of Dentistry2311-52702015-09-01273Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushingHadeel M AkramBackground: Removing dental plaque is important to maintain a good oral hygiene and prevent periodontal disease; this could not be accomplished by the use of toothbrush alone, it needs the help of interdental aids or intra-oral irrigator devices. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of using Waterpik flosser as adjunct to tooth brushing than using the dental floss with the brushing. Materials and methods: A single blind, six weeks study included 45 subjects divided into three groups of 15 subjects at each group. Group B (brushing) was instructed to use the toothbrush only, group BF (brushing & flossing) was instructed to use dental floss and tooth brushing while group BW (brushing and Waterpik flosser) was instructed to use Waterpik flosser in addition to the toothbrush. Plaque index, gingival index and bleeding on probing were measured at the 1st visit, after 3 weeks (2nd visit) and finally after 6 weeks (3rd visit). Results: The plaque index was significantly reduced in group BF and BW at the 3rd visit, while it showed no significant differences in group B. The mean percentage reduction of gingival index at the 3rd visit was higher in group BW than group B and group BF. Using the chi-square test, bleeding on probing showed no significant difference in group B, while there was significant reduction in group BF and highly significant reduction (phttps://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/812
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hadeel M Akram
spellingShingle Hadeel M Akram
Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing
Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
author_facet Hadeel M Akram
author_sort Hadeel M Akram
title Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing
title_short Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing
title_full Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing
title_fullStr Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between powerful Waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing
title_sort comparison between powerful waterpik flosser with dental floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing
publisher College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad
series Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
issn 2311-5270
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Background: Removing dental plaque is important to maintain a good oral hygiene and prevent periodontal disease; this could not be accomplished by the use of toothbrush alone, it needs the help of interdental aids or intra-oral irrigator devices. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of using Waterpik flosser as adjunct to tooth brushing than using the dental floss with the brushing. Materials and methods: A single blind, six weeks study included 45 subjects divided into three groups of 15 subjects at each group. Group B (brushing) was instructed to use the toothbrush only, group BF (brushing & flossing) was instructed to use dental floss and tooth brushing while group BW (brushing and Waterpik flosser) was instructed to use Waterpik flosser in addition to the toothbrush. Plaque index, gingival index and bleeding on probing were measured at the 1st visit, after 3 weeks (2nd visit) and finally after 6 weeks (3rd visit). Results: The plaque index was significantly reduced in group BF and BW at the 3rd visit, while it showed no significant differences in group B. The mean percentage reduction of gingival index at the 3rd visit was higher in group BW than group B and group BF. Using the chi-square test, bleeding on probing showed no significant difference in group B, while there was significant reduction in group BF and highly significant reduction (p
url https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/812
work_keys_str_mv AT hadeelmakram comparisonbetweenpowerfulwaterpikflosserwithdentalflossasanadjuncttotoothbrushing
_version_ 1721170876886417408