THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISM

One of the first moments when the new information and communication technologies were used in a political protest was the Orange Revolution that took place in Ukraine from late November 2004 to January 2005. Ever since that moment social media proved to be an important tool of political revolt. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MARIA CERNAT
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2012-05-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2012_articles/index.php?dir=03_social_sciences%2F&download=cks_2012_social_sciences_art_006.pdf
id doaj-dcb32a0f6da94443ae3397aa4a4ce1e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dcb32a0f6da94443ae3397aa4a4ce1e72020-11-25T00:31:20ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962012-05-012-16831689THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISMMARIA CERNATOne of the first moments when the new information and communication technologies were used in a political protest was the Orange Revolution that took place in Ukraine from late November 2004 to January 2005. Ever since that moment social media proved to be an important tool of political revolt. The London protests, the Arab Spring or Moldova’s Twitter Revolution are only a few of the most representative moments when digital media were used in organizing political protests. Obviously, the new communication tools paved the way for a new type of organizing collective action and political uprising. Once the Orange Revolution took place, media theorists and political philosophers emphasized the role of the new media in political reform. Most of today’s articles analyzing this phenomenon share a rather optimistic perspective on the role the new social media is playing in political reform, offering a “microphone to the masses”. My perspective is rather pessimistic. I think that, before enthusiastically embracing the benefits of the new digital media, we must acknowledge the indisputable dangers that threaten the ideal of liberating technology. What I try to prove in my article is that there are two types of challenges when it comes to the role the new information and communication technologies play in political protests. First of all, there are state regulations used by the political leaders to restrict access to the new technologies, to identify those opposing their regime and to use the new media as a propaganda tool. These bear direct negative influences on the way the new digital media are used. But, as I shall try to prove in my article, there is also another type of challenge that could endanger the ideal of liberating technology. The neoliberal deregulation of media led to a so-called “feudalization” of the Internet, whereby huge media trusts try to control important parts of the information market, transforming it into a closed and controlled environment.http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2012_articles/index.php?dir=03_social_sciences%2F&download=cks_2012_social_sciences_art_006.pdfsocial mediapolitical protestfeudalization of the Internetliberating technologyoppressive technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author MARIA CERNAT
spellingShingle MARIA CERNAT
THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISM
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
social media
political protest
feudalization of the Internet
liberating technology
oppressive technology
author_facet MARIA CERNAT
author_sort MARIA CERNAT
title THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISM
title_short THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISM
title_full THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISM
title_fullStr THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISM
title_full_unstemmed THE FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACTIVISM
title_sort future of digital activism
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
issn 2068-7796
publishDate 2012-05-01
description One of the first moments when the new information and communication technologies were used in a political protest was the Orange Revolution that took place in Ukraine from late November 2004 to January 2005. Ever since that moment social media proved to be an important tool of political revolt. The London protests, the Arab Spring or Moldova’s Twitter Revolution are only a few of the most representative moments when digital media were used in organizing political protests. Obviously, the new communication tools paved the way for a new type of organizing collective action and political uprising. Once the Orange Revolution took place, media theorists and political philosophers emphasized the role of the new media in political reform. Most of today’s articles analyzing this phenomenon share a rather optimistic perspective on the role the new social media is playing in political reform, offering a “microphone to the masses”. My perspective is rather pessimistic. I think that, before enthusiastically embracing the benefits of the new digital media, we must acknowledge the indisputable dangers that threaten the ideal of liberating technology. What I try to prove in my article is that there are two types of challenges when it comes to the role the new information and communication technologies play in political protests. First of all, there are state regulations used by the political leaders to restrict access to the new technologies, to identify those opposing their regime and to use the new media as a propaganda tool. These bear direct negative influences on the way the new digital media are used. But, as I shall try to prove in my article, there is also another type of challenge that could endanger the ideal of liberating technology. The neoliberal deregulation of media led to a so-called “feudalization” of the Internet, whereby huge media trusts try to control important parts of the information market, transforming it into a closed and controlled environment.
topic social media
political protest
feudalization of the Internet
liberating technology
oppressive technology
url http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2012_articles/index.php?dir=03_social_sciences%2F&download=cks_2012_social_sciences_art_006.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariacernat thefutureofdigitalactivism
AT mariacernat futureofdigitalactivism
_version_ 1725322578122244096