Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.

A key finding in studies of the neurobiology of learning memory is that the amygdala is critically involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning. This is well established in delay-cued and contextual fear conditioning; however, surprisingly little is known of the role of the amygdala in trace conditioning...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan D Raybuck, K Matthew Lattal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3023765?pdf=render
id doaj-dcb16d05cf83419e80dcf57e5c05defa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dcb16d05cf83419e80dcf57e5c05defa2020-11-25T02:56:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0161e1598210.1371/journal.pone.0015982Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.Jonathan D RaybuckK Matthew LattalA key finding in studies of the neurobiology of learning memory is that the amygdala is critically involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning. This is well established in delay-cued and contextual fear conditioning; however, surprisingly little is known of the role of the amygdala in trace conditioning. Trace fear conditioning, in which the CS and US are separated in time by a trace interval, requires the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. It is possible that recruitment of cortical structures by trace conditioning alters the role of the amygdala compared to delay fear conditioning, where the CS and US overlap. To investigate this, we inactivated the amygdala of male C57BL/6 mice with GABA (A) agonist muscimol prior to 2-pairing trace or delay fear conditioning. Amygdala inactivation produced deficits in contextual and delay conditioning, but had no effect on trace conditioning. As controls, we demonstrate that dorsal hippocampal inactivation produced deficits in trace and contextual, but not delay fear conditioning. Further, pre- and post-training amygdala inactivation disrupted the contextual but the not cued component of trace conditioning, as did muscimol infusion prior to 1- or 4-pairing trace conditioning. These findings demonstrate that insertion of a temporal gap between the CS and US can generate amygdala-independent fear conditioning. We discuss the implications of this surprising finding for current models of the neural circuitry involved in fear conditioning.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3023765?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan D Raybuck
K Matthew Lattal
spellingShingle Jonathan D Raybuck
K Matthew Lattal
Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jonathan D Raybuck
K Matthew Lattal
author_sort Jonathan D Raybuck
title Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.
title_short Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.
title_full Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.
title_fullStr Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.
title_full_unstemmed Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.
title_sort double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description A key finding in studies of the neurobiology of learning memory is that the amygdala is critically involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning. This is well established in delay-cued and contextual fear conditioning; however, surprisingly little is known of the role of the amygdala in trace conditioning. Trace fear conditioning, in which the CS and US are separated in time by a trace interval, requires the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. It is possible that recruitment of cortical structures by trace conditioning alters the role of the amygdala compared to delay fear conditioning, where the CS and US overlap. To investigate this, we inactivated the amygdala of male C57BL/6 mice with GABA (A) agonist muscimol prior to 2-pairing trace or delay fear conditioning. Amygdala inactivation produced deficits in contextual and delay conditioning, but had no effect on trace conditioning. As controls, we demonstrate that dorsal hippocampal inactivation produced deficits in trace and contextual, but not delay fear conditioning. Further, pre- and post-training amygdala inactivation disrupted the contextual but the not cued component of trace conditioning, as did muscimol infusion prior to 1- or 4-pairing trace conditioning. These findings demonstrate that insertion of a temporal gap between the CS and US can generate amygdala-independent fear conditioning. We discuss the implications of this surprising finding for current models of the neural circuitry involved in fear conditioning.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3023765?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathandraybuck doubledissociationofamygdalaandhippocampalcontributionstotraceanddelayfearconditioning
AT kmatthewlattal doubledissociationofamygdalaandhippocampalcontributionstotraceanddelayfearconditioning
_version_ 1724714273643429888