“Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological Epistemology

During the Transfiguration, the apostles on Tabor, “indeed saw the same grace of the Spirit which would later dwell in them”. The light of grace “illuminates from outside (ἔξωθεν) on those who worthily approached it and sent the illumination to the soul through the sensitive eyes; but today, because...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nichifor Tanase
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: International Journal of Orthodox Theology 2015-12-01
Series:International Journal of Orthodox Theology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/IJOT4.2015/Nichifor.Tanase.pdf
id doaj-dca89dc556ba4bad99fd5830a3b15714
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dca89dc556ba4bad99fd5830a3b157142020-11-24T22:27:19ZdeuInternational Journal of Orthodox TheologyInternational Journal of Orthodox Theology2190-05822190-05822015-12-016469106“Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological EpistemologyNichifor Tanase0Eftimie Murgu University Reșita, RomaniaDuring the Transfiguration, the apostles on Tabor, “indeed saw the same grace of the Spirit which would later dwell in them”. The light of grace “illuminates from outside (ἔξωθεν) on those who worthily approached it and sent the illumination to the soul through the sensitive eyes; but today, because it is confounded with us (ἀνακραθὲν ἡμῖν) and exists in us, it illuminates the soul from inward (ἔνδωθεν)”. The opposition between knowledge, which comes from outside (ἔξωθεν) - a human and purely symbolic knowledge - and “intellectual” knowledge, which comes from within (ἔνδωθεν), Meyendorff says what it already exists at Pseudo-Dionysius: “For it is not from without that God stirs them toward the divine. Rather he does so via the intellect and from within and he willingly enlightens them with a ray that is pure and immaterial”. The assertions of the Calabrian philosopher about an “unique knowledge”, common both to the Christians and the Hellenes and pursuing the same goal, the hesychast theologian opposes the reality of the two knowledge, having two distinct purposes and based on two different instruments of perception: “Palamas admitted the authenticity of natural knowledge, however the latter is opposed to the revealed wisdom, that is why it does not provide, by itself, salvation”. Therefore, in the purified human intellect begins to shine of the Trinity light. Purity also depends on the return of the intellect (its proper energy) to itself. In this way, we see how the true knowledge of God is an internal meeting or “inner retrieval” of the whole being of man. As well as in the Syrian mystic, on several occasions we have to make the distinction between the contemplative ways of knowledge: intellection illuminated by grace and spiritual vision without any conceptual or symbolic meaning. For example, Robert Beulay shows that, “The term of ‘intellection’ first of all, is employed by John of Dalyatha to be applied to operations caused by grace”.http://orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/IJOT4.2015/Nichifor.Tanase.pdfGregory Palamasessence-energies distinctionontological epistemologytheological methodologyAristotelian logicdeification
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nichifor Tanase
spellingShingle Nichifor Tanase
“Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological Epistemology
International Journal of Orthodox Theology
Gregory Palamas
essence-energies distinction
ontological epistemology
theological methodology
Aristotelian logic
deification
author_facet Nichifor Tanase
author_sort Nichifor Tanase
title “Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological Epistemology
title_short “Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological Epistemology
title_full “Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological Epistemology
title_fullStr “Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological Epistemology
title_full_unstemmed “Crucifixion” of the Logic. Palamite Theology of the Uncreaded Divine Energies as Fundament of an Ontological Epistemology
title_sort “crucifixion” of the logic. palamite theology of the uncreaded divine energies as fundament of an ontological epistemology
publisher International Journal of Orthodox Theology
series International Journal of Orthodox Theology
issn 2190-0582
2190-0582
publishDate 2015-12-01
description During the Transfiguration, the apostles on Tabor, “indeed saw the same grace of the Spirit which would later dwell in them”. The light of grace “illuminates from outside (ἔξωθεν) on those who worthily approached it and sent the illumination to the soul through the sensitive eyes; but today, because it is confounded with us (ἀνακραθὲν ἡμῖν) and exists in us, it illuminates the soul from inward (ἔνδωθεν)”. The opposition between knowledge, which comes from outside (ἔξωθεν) - a human and purely symbolic knowledge - and “intellectual” knowledge, which comes from within (ἔνδωθεν), Meyendorff says what it already exists at Pseudo-Dionysius: “For it is not from without that God stirs them toward the divine. Rather he does so via the intellect and from within and he willingly enlightens them with a ray that is pure and immaterial”. The assertions of the Calabrian philosopher about an “unique knowledge”, common both to the Christians and the Hellenes and pursuing the same goal, the hesychast theologian opposes the reality of the two knowledge, having two distinct purposes and based on two different instruments of perception: “Palamas admitted the authenticity of natural knowledge, however the latter is opposed to the revealed wisdom, that is why it does not provide, by itself, salvation”. Therefore, in the purified human intellect begins to shine of the Trinity light. Purity also depends on the return of the intellect (its proper energy) to itself. In this way, we see how the true knowledge of God is an internal meeting or “inner retrieval” of the whole being of man. As well as in the Syrian mystic, on several occasions we have to make the distinction between the contemplative ways of knowledge: intellection illuminated by grace and spiritual vision without any conceptual or symbolic meaning. For example, Robert Beulay shows that, “The term of ‘intellection’ first of all, is employed by John of Dalyatha to be applied to operations caused by grace”.
topic Gregory Palamas
essence-energies distinction
ontological epistemology
theological methodology
Aristotelian logic
deification
url http://orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/IJOT4.2015/Nichifor.Tanase.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nichifortanase crucifixionofthelogicpalamitetheologyoftheuncreadeddivineenergiesasfundamentofanontologicalepistemology
_version_ 1725750539016208384