Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates

In this study, we investigate how Wilks’ lambda, Pillai’s trace, Hotelling’s trace, and Roy’s largest root test statistics can be affected when the normal and homogeneous variance assumptions of the MANOVA method are violated. In other words, in these cases, the robustness of the tests is examined....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Can Ateş, Özlem Kaymaz, H. Emre Kale, Mustafa Agah Tekindal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2173638
id doaj-dca3d96c061c4e168be5c42d54098087
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dca3d96c061c4e168be5c42d540980872020-11-25T01:18:04ZengHindawi LimitedComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine1748-670X1748-67182019-01-01201910.1155/2019/21736382173638Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error RatesCan Ateş0Özlem Kaymaz1H. Emre Kale2Mustafa Agah Tekindal3Department of Biostatistics, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, TurkeyDepartment of Statistics, Ankara University, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Interdisciplinary Neuroscience, Ankara University, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Biostatistics, Selçuk University, Konya, TurkeyIn this study, we investigate how Wilks’ lambda, Pillai’s trace, Hotelling’s trace, and Roy’s largest root test statistics can be affected when the normal and homogeneous variance assumptions of the MANOVA method are violated. In other words, in these cases, the robustness of the tests is examined. For this purpose, a simulation study is conducted in different scenarios. In different variable numbers and different sample sizes, considering the group variances are homogeneous σ12=σ22=⋯=σg2 and heterogeneous (increasing) σ12<σ22<⋯<σg2, random numbers are generated from Gamma(4-4-4; 0.5), Gamma(4-9-36; 0.5), Student’s t(2), and Normal(0; 1) distributions. Furthermore, the number of observations in the groups being balanced and unbalanced is also taken into account. After 10000 repetitions, type-I error values are calculated for each test for α = 0.05. In the Gamma distribution, Pillai’s trace test statistic gives more robust results in the case of homogeneous and heterogeneous variances for 2 variables, and in the case of 3 variables, Roy’s largest root test statistic gives more robust results in balanced samples and Pillai’s trace test statistic in unbalanced samples. In Student’s t distribution, Pillai’s trace test statistic gives more robust results in the case of homogeneous variance and Wilks’ lambda test statistic in the case of heterogeneous variance. In the normal distribution, in the case of homogeneous variance for 2 variables, Roy’s largest root test statistic gives relatively more robust results and Wilks’ lambda test statistic for 3 variables. Also in the case of heterogeneous variance for 2 and 3 variables, Roy’s largest root test statistic gives robust results in the normal distribution. The test statistics used with MANOVA are affected by the violation of homogeneity of covariance matrices and normality assumptions particularly from unbalanced number of observations.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2173638
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Can Ateş
Özlem Kaymaz
H. Emre Kale
Mustafa Agah Tekindal
spellingShingle Can Ateş
Özlem Kaymaz
H. Emre Kale
Mustafa Agah Tekindal
Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
author_facet Can Ateş
Özlem Kaymaz
H. Emre Kale
Mustafa Agah Tekindal
author_sort Can Ateş
title Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates
title_short Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates
title_full Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates
title_fullStr Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates
title_sort comparison of test statistics of nonnormal and unbalanced samples for multivariate analysis of variance in terms of type-i error rates
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
issn 1748-670X
1748-6718
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In this study, we investigate how Wilks’ lambda, Pillai’s trace, Hotelling’s trace, and Roy’s largest root test statistics can be affected when the normal and homogeneous variance assumptions of the MANOVA method are violated. In other words, in these cases, the robustness of the tests is examined. For this purpose, a simulation study is conducted in different scenarios. In different variable numbers and different sample sizes, considering the group variances are homogeneous σ12=σ22=⋯=σg2 and heterogeneous (increasing) σ12<σ22<⋯<σg2, random numbers are generated from Gamma(4-4-4; 0.5), Gamma(4-9-36; 0.5), Student’s t(2), and Normal(0; 1) distributions. Furthermore, the number of observations in the groups being balanced and unbalanced is also taken into account. After 10000 repetitions, type-I error values are calculated for each test for α = 0.05. In the Gamma distribution, Pillai’s trace test statistic gives more robust results in the case of homogeneous and heterogeneous variances for 2 variables, and in the case of 3 variables, Roy’s largest root test statistic gives more robust results in balanced samples and Pillai’s trace test statistic in unbalanced samples. In Student’s t distribution, Pillai’s trace test statistic gives more robust results in the case of homogeneous variance and Wilks’ lambda test statistic in the case of heterogeneous variance. In the normal distribution, in the case of homogeneous variance for 2 variables, Roy’s largest root test statistic gives relatively more robust results and Wilks’ lambda test statistic for 3 variables. Also in the case of heterogeneous variance for 2 and 3 variables, Roy’s largest root test statistic gives robust results in the normal distribution. The test statistics used with MANOVA are affected by the violation of homogeneity of covariance matrices and normality assumptions particularly from unbalanced number of observations.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2173638
work_keys_str_mv AT canates comparisonofteststatisticsofnonnormalandunbalancedsamplesformultivariateanalysisofvarianceintermsoftypeierrorrates
AT ozlemkaymaz comparisonofteststatisticsofnonnormalandunbalancedsamplesformultivariateanalysisofvarianceintermsoftypeierrorrates
AT hemrekale comparisonofteststatisticsofnonnormalandunbalancedsamplesformultivariateanalysisofvarianceintermsoftypeierrorrates
AT mustafaagahtekindal comparisonofteststatisticsofnonnormalandunbalancedsamplesformultivariateanalysisofvarianceintermsoftypeierrorrates
_version_ 1725143913215295488