On Trying to Teach Judgment

What does it mean to be a “professional?” The question lies at the heart of any attempt to teach professional ethics. Yet, despite its undeniable centrality, there is remarkably little consensus among the current generation of legal ethics teachers about what this term actually means beyond its obvi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Douglas N Frenkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6138-on-trying-to-teach-judgment.pdf
id doaj-dc9f856a0a8648fb9a58bbaf0cb85cb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc9f856a0a8648fb9a58bbaf0cb85cb72020-11-25T01:50:24ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-2839On Trying to Teach JudgmentDouglas N FrenkelWhat does it mean to be a “professional?” The question lies at the heart of any attempt to teach professional ethics. Yet, despite its undeniable centrality, there is remarkably little consensus among the current generation of legal ethics teachers about what this term actually means beyond its obvious historical and descriptive connotations. Few would deny, of course, that lawyers have traditionally been considered “professionals” or that, in the minds of many, this designation carries with it certain normative implications about the relationship between lawyers and society that links the “legal profession” to the small number of other occupational groups (for example, doctors) that are also considered professionals. What has become quite controversial, however, is whether these normative claims are either true or, if true, socially desirable. Moreover, even among those who believe that the concept has some independent normative value worth preserving, the claim that “professionalism” can be taught remains deeply controversial.http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6138-on-trying-to-teach-judgment.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Douglas N Frenkel
spellingShingle Douglas N Frenkel
On Trying to Teach Judgment
Legal Education Review
author_facet Douglas N Frenkel
author_sort Douglas N Frenkel
title On Trying to Teach Judgment
title_short On Trying to Teach Judgment
title_full On Trying to Teach Judgment
title_fullStr On Trying to Teach Judgment
title_full_unstemmed On Trying to Teach Judgment
title_sort on trying to teach judgment
publisher Bond University
series Legal Education Review
issn 1033-2839
description What does it mean to be a “professional?” The question lies at the heart of any attempt to teach professional ethics. Yet, despite its undeniable centrality, there is remarkably little consensus among the current generation of legal ethics teachers about what this term actually means beyond its obvious historical and descriptive connotations. Few would deny, of course, that lawyers have traditionally been considered “professionals” or that, in the minds of many, this designation carries with it certain normative implications about the relationship between lawyers and society that links the “legal profession” to the small number of other occupational groups (for example, doctors) that are also considered professionals. What has become quite controversial, however, is whether these normative claims are either true or, if true, socially desirable. Moreover, even among those who believe that the concept has some independent normative value worth preserving, the claim that “professionalism” can be taught remains deeply controversial.
url http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6138-on-trying-to-teach-judgment.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasnfrenkel ontryingtoteachjudgment
_version_ 1725002111115067392