Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy

This paper is a polemical response to Grigory Goutner’s “Secularity, Post-Secularity, and Russian Religious Philosophy”. The discussion is centered around the issue of the correlation between totality and network-type integrity, while secularization is interpreted as an attempt to shift the integrit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vladislav Shaposhnikov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: St. Philaret’s Christian Orthodox Institute 2015-11-01
Series:Вестник Свято-Филаретовского института
Subjects:
Online Access:https://psmb-neos-resources.hb.bizmrg.com/target/sfi/340b41463bf276a23a17b92fd6874b3b38114201/16_Shaposhnikov_100-112.pdf
id doaj-dc8e0824b19d4c36a9ad56fa0ddc1112
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc8e0824b19d4c36a9ad56fa0ddc11122021-09-28T13:20:47ZengSt. Philaret’s Christian Orthodox InstituteВестник Свято-Филаретовского института2658-75992713-31412015-11-0115100112Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian PhilosophyVladislav Shaposhnikov0Ph.D. in PhilosophyThis paper is a polemical response to Grigory Goutner’s “Secularity, Post-Secularity, and Russian Religious Philosophy”. The discussion is centered around the issue of the correlation between totality and network-type integrity, while secularization is interpreted as an attempt to shift the integrity type from the former to the latter. The project of naturalism is the contemporary realization of the secular way of thinking; nevertheless, it failed to take its place among the items discussed in the Goutner’s article. The Goutner’s project of complementary discourses is opposed by the project to connect the network-type integrity and the totality on equal grounds and within the same conceptual framework. In this context it is challenged that Russian religious philosophy has been working exclusively within the paradigm of totality. Finally, the prospects of Russian religious philosophy are discussed.https://psmb-neos-resources.hb.bizmrg.com/target/sfi/340b41463bf276a23a17b92fd6874b3b38114201/16_Shaposhnikov_100-112.pdftotalityintegrityfragmentarinessnetwork-type integritytheological determinism and free willsecularitythe project of naturalismrussian religious philosophyтотальностьцелостностьфрагментарностьсетевой тип целостностипредопределенность и свободасекулярностьнатуралистический проектрусская религиозная философия
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vladislav Shaposhnikov
spellingShingle Vladislav Shaposhnikov
Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy
Вестник Свято-Филаретовского института
totality
integrity
fragmentariness
network-type integrity
theological determinism and free will
secularity
the project of naturalism
russian religious philosophy
тотальность
целостность
фрагментарность
сетевой тип целостности
предопределенность и свобода
секулярность
натуралистический проект
русская религиозная философия
author_facet Vladislav Shaposhnikov
author_sort Vladislav Shaposhnikov
title Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy
title_short Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy
title_full Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy
title_fullStr Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy
title_sort cursory notes on totality, secularity, and russian philosophy
publisher St. Philaret’s Christian Orthodox Institute
series Вестник Свято-Филаретовского института
issn 2658-7599
2713-3141
publishDate 2015-11-01
description This paper is a polemical response to Grigory Goutner’s “Secularity, Post-Secularity, and Russian Religious Philosophy”. The discussion is centered around the issue of the correlation between totality and network-type integrity, while secularization is interpreted as an attempt to shift the integrity type from the former to the latter. The project of naturalism is the contemporary realization of the secular way of thinking; nevertheless, it failed to take its place among the items discussed in the Goutner’s article. The Goutner’s project of complementary discourses is opposed by the project to connect the network-type integrity and the totality on equal grounds and within the same conceptual framework. In this context it is challenged that Russian religious philosophy has been working exclusively within the paradigm of totality. Finally, the prospects of Russian religious philosophy are discussed.
topic totality
integrity
fragmentariness
network-type integrity
theological determinism and free will
secularity
the project of naturalism
russian religious philosophy
тотальность
целостность
фрагментарность
сетевой тип целостности
предопределенность и свобода
секулярность
натуралистический проект
русская религиозная философия
url https://psmb-neos-resources.hb.bizmrg.com/target/sfi/340b41463bf276a23a17b92fd6874b3b38114201/16_Shaposhnikov_100-112.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vladislavshaposhnikov cursorynotesontotalitysecularityandrussianphilosophy
_version_ 1716866131711492096