Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy
This paper is a polemical response to Grigory Goutner’s “Secularity, Post-Secularity, and Russian Religious Philosophy”. The discussion is centered around the issue of the correlation between totality and network-type integrity, while secularization is interpreted as an attempt to shift the integrit...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
St. Philaret’s Christian Orthodox Institute
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Вестник Свято-Филаретовского института |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://psmb-neos-resources.hb.bizmrg.com/target/sfi/340b41463bf276a23a17b92fd6874b3b38114201/16_Shaposhnikov_100-112.pdf |
id |
doaj-dc8e0824b19d4c36a9ad56fa0ddc1112 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dc8e0824b19d4c36a9ad56fa0ddc11122021-09-28T13:20:47ZengSt. Philaret’s Christian Orthodox InstituteВестник Свято-Филаретовского института2658-75992713-31412015-11-0115100112Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian PhilosophyVladislav Shaposhnikov0Ph.D. in PhilosophyThis paper is a polemical response to Grigory Goutner’s “Secularity, Post-Secularity, and Russian Religious Philosophy”. The discussion is centered around the issue of the correlation between totality and network-type integrity, while secularization is interpreted as an attempt to shift the integrity type from the former to the latter. The project of naturalism is the contemporary realization of the secular way of thinking; nevertheless, it failed to take its place among the items discussed in the Goutner’s article. The Goutner’s project of complementary discourses is opposed by the project to connect the network-type integrity and the totality on equal grounds and within the same conceptual framework. In this context it is challenged that Russian religious philosophy has been working exclusively within the paradigm of totality. Finally, the prospects of Russian religious philosophy are discussed.https://psmb-neos-resources.hb.bizmrg.com/target/sfi/340b41463bf276a23a17b92fd6874b3b38114201/16_Shaposhnikov_100-112.pdftotalityintegrityfragmentarinessnetwork-type integritytheological determinism and free willsecularitythe project of naturalismrussian religious philosophyтотальностьцелостностьфрагментарностьсетевой тип целостностипредопределенность и свободасекулярностьнатуралистический проектрусская религиозная философия |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vladislav Shaposhnikov |
spellingShingle |
Vladislav Shaposhnikov Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy Вестник Свято-Филаретовского института totality integrity fragmentariness network-type integrity theological determinism and free will secularity the project of naturalism russian religious philosophy тотальность целостность фрагментарность сетевой тип целостности предопределенность и свобода секулярность натуралистический проект русская религиозная философия |
author_facet |
Vladislav Shaposhnikov |
author_sort |
Vladislav Shaposhnikov |
title |
Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy |
title_short |
Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy |
title_full |
Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy |
title_fullStr |
Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cursory Notes on Totality, Secularity, and Russian Philosophy |
title_sort |
cursory notes on totality, secularity, and russian philosophy |
publisher |
St. Philaret’s Christian Orthodox Institute |
series |
Вестник Свято-Филаретовского института |
issn |
2658-7599 2713-3141 |
publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
description |
This paper is a polemical response to Grigory Goutner’s “Secularity, Post-Secularity, and Russian Religious Philosophy”. The discussion is centered around the issue of the correlation between totality and network-type integrity, while secularization is interpreted as an attempt to shift the integrity type from the former to the latter. The project of naturalism is the contemporary realization of the secular way of thinking; nevertheless, it failed to take its place among the items discussed in the Goutner’s article. The Goutner’s project of complementary discourses is opposed by the project to connect the network-type integrity and the totality on equal grounds and within the same conceptual framework. In this context it is challenged that Russian religious philosophy has been working exclusively within the paradigm of totality. Finally, the prospects of Russian religious philosophy are discussed. |
topic |
totality integrity fragmentariness network-type integrity theological determinism and free will secularity the project of naturalism russian religious philosophy тотальность целостность фрагментарность сетевой тип целостности предопределенность и свобода секулярность натуралистический проект русская религиозная философия |
url |
https://psmb-neos-resources.hb.bizmrg.com/target/sfi/340b41463bf276a23a17b92fd6874b3b38114201/16_Shaposhnikov_100-112.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vladislavshaposhnikov cursorynotesontotalitysecularityandrussianphilosophy |
_version_ |
1716866131711492096 |