On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017

Abstract This paper presents how the magnetosphere–plasmasphere–ionosphere system was affected as a whole during the geomagnetic storm peaking on 27 May 2017. The interplanetary conditions, the magnetospheric response in terms of the magnetopause motion, and the ionospheric current flow pattern were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Pezzopane, Afredo Del Corpo, Mirko Piersanti, Claudio Cesaroni, Alessio Pignalberi, Simone Di Matteo, Luca Spogli, Massimo Vellante, Balazs Heilig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-07-01
Series:Earth, Planets and Space
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40623-019-1056-0
id doaj-dc6ccf1913dd4f12ac65ab74366f316e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc6ccf1913dd4f12ac65ab74366f316e2020-11-25T03:13:09ZengSpringerOpenEarth, Planets and Space1880-59812019-07-0171112110.1186/s40623-019-1056-0On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017Michael Pezzopane0Afredo Del Corpo1Mirko Piersanti2Claudio Cesaroni3Alessio Pignalberi4Simone Di Matteo5Luca Spogli6Massimo Vellante7Balazs Heilig8Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of L’AquilaNational Institute of Nuclear Physics, University of “Tor Vergata”Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of L’AquilaIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of L’AquilaMining and Geological Survey of HungaryAbstract This paper presents how the magnetosphere–plasmasphere–ionosphere system was affected as a whole during the geomagnetic storm peaking on 27 May 2017. The interplanetary conditions, the magnetospheric response in terms of the magnetopause motion, and the ionospheric current flow pattern were investigated using data, respectively, from the WIND spacecraft, from GOES15, GOES13, THEMIS E, THEMIS D and THEMIS A satellites and from the INTERMAGNET magnetometer array. The main objective of the work is to investigate the plasmaspheric dynamics under disturbed conditions and its possible relation to the ionospheric one; to reach this goal, the equatorial plasma mass densities derived from geomagnetic field line resonance observations at the European quasi-Meridional Magnetometer Array (EMMA) and total electron content values obtained through three GPS receivers close to EMMA were jointly considered. Despite the complexity of physical mechanisms behind them, we found a similarity between the ionospheric and plasmaspheric characteristic recovery times. Specifically, the ionospheric characteristic time turned out to be ~ 1.5 days, ~ 2 days and ~ 3.1 days, respectively, at L ~ 3, L ~ 4 and L ~ 5, while the plasmaspheric one, for similar L values, ranged from ~ 1 day to more than 4 days.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40623-019-1056-0Geomagnetic stormMagnetopause motionMagnetopause crossingPlasmasphere dynamicsGeomagnetic field line resonancesIonospheric currents
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Pezzopane
Afredo Del Corpo
Mirko Piersanti
Claudio Cesaroni
Alessio Pignalberi
Simone Di Matteo
Luca Spogli
Massimo Vellante
Balazs Heilig
spellingShingle Michael Pezzopane
Afredo Del Corpo
Mirko Piersanti
Claudio Cesaroni
Alessio Pignalberi
Simone Di Matteo
Luca Spogli
Massimo Vellante
Balazs Heilig
On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017
Earth, Planets and Space
Geomagnetic storm
Magnetopause motion
Magnetopause crossing
Plasmasphere dynamics
Geomagnetic field line resonances
Ionospheric currents
author_facet Michael Pezzopane
Afredo Del Corpo
Mirko Piersanti
Claudio Cesaroni
Alessio Pignalberi
Simone Di Matteo
Luca Spogli
Massimo Vellante
Balazs Heilig
author_sort Michael Pezzopane
title On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017
title_short On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017
title_full On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017
title_fullStr On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017
title_full_unstemmed On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 May 2017
title_sort on some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27 may 2017
publisher SpringerOpen
series Earth, Planets and Space
issn 1880-5981
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract This paper presents how the magnetosphere–plasmasphere–ionosphere system was affected as a whole during the geomagnetic storm peaking on 27 May 2017. The interplanetary conditions, the magnetospheric response in terms of the magnetopause motion, and the ionospheric current flow pattern were investigated using data, respectively, from the WIND spacecraft, from GOES15, GOES13, THEMIS E, THEMIS D and THEMIS A satellites and from the INTERMAGNET magnetometer array. The main objective of the work is to investigate the plasmaspheric dynamics under disturbed conditions and its possible relation to the ionospheric one; to reach this goal, the equatorial plasma mass densities derived from geomagnetic field line resonance observations at the European quasi-Meridional Magnetometer Array (EMMA) and total electron content values obtained through three GPS receivers close to EMMA were jointly considered. Despite the complexity of physical mechanisms behind them, we found a similarity between the ionospheric and plasmaspheric characteristic recovery times. Specifically, the ionospheric characteristic time turned out to be ~ 1.5 days, ~ 2 days and ~ 3.1 days, respectively, at L ~ 3, L ~ 4 and L ~ 5, while the plasmaspheric one, for similar L values, ranged from ~ 1 day to more than 4 days.
topic Geomagnetic storm
Magnetopause motion
Magnetopause crossing
Plasmasphere dynamics
Geomagnetic field line resonances
Ionospheric currents
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40623-019-1056-0
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelpezzopane onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT afredodelcorpo onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT mirkopiersanti onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT claudiocesaroni onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT alessiopignalberi onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT simonedimatteo onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT lucaspogli onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT massimovellante onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
AT balazsheilig onsomefeaturescharacterizingtheplasmaspheremagnetosphereionospheresystemduringthegeomagneticstormof27may2017
_version_ 1724648429792002048