Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation

In the article, based on the comparison of different approaches to the fault of a legal entity in an administrative offense, the possibility and necessity of establishing an intentional or reckless form of guilt of a legal entity in committing an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sergei S. Sumenkov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Omsk Law Academy 2017-12-01
Series:Сибирское юридическое обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/525
id doaj-dc6ac87d367f45f5b619011b6d88bf25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc6ac87d367f45f5b619011b6d88bf252021-07-09T07:14:33ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102017-12-0114450050410.19073/2306-1340-2017-14-4-132-136499Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly LegislationSergei S. Sumenkov0Omsk airport FyodorovkaIn the article, based on the comparison of different approaches to the fault of a legal entity in an administrative offense, the possibility and necessity of establishing an intentional or reckless form of guilt of a legal entity in committing an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly legislation through the forms of fault of the respective officials are substantiated. Specific features of the “intellectual” element of guilt are applied in relation to the corresponding composition of administrative offenses. Attention is drawn to the role of antimonopoly compliance in establishing the guilt of organizations in administrative offenses in the field of antimonopoly legislation. It is proposed to introduce into the administrative law institutes of complicity, double forms of guilt and kurtosis of the executor in order to ensure proper involvement of both organizations and their officials in administrative responsibility.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/525административное правонарушениеантимонопольное законодательствовина юридического лицадвойная форма виныadministrative offenseantimonopoly legislationlegal entity guiltdouble form of guilt
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sergei S. Sumenkov
spellingShingle Sergei S. Sumenkov
Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation
Сибирское юридическое обозрение
административное правонарушение
антимонопольное законодательство
вина юридического лица
двойная форма вины
administrative offense
antimonopoly legislation
legal entity guilt
double form of guilt
author_facet Sergei S. Sumenkov
author_sort Sergei S. Sumenkov
title Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation
title_short Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation
title_full Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation
title_fullStr Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation
title_full_unstemmed Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation
title_sort guilt of a legal entity in an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly legislation
publisher Omsk Law Academy
series Сибирское юридическое обозрение
issn 2658-7602
2658-7610
publishDate 2017-12-01
description In the article, based on the comparison of different approaches to the fault of a legal entity in an administrative offense, the possibility and necessity of establishing an intentional or reckless form of guilt of a legal entity in committing an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly legislation through the forms of fault of the respective officials are substantiated. Specific features of the “intellectual” element of guilt are applied in relation to the corresponding composition of administrative offenses. Attention is drawn to the role of antimonopoly compliance in establishing the guilt of organizations in administrative offenses in the field of antimonopoly legislation. It is proposed to introduce into the administrative law institutes of complicity, double forms of guilt and kurtosis of the executor in order to ensure proper involvement of both organizations and their officials in administrative responsibility.
topic административное правонарушение
антимонопольное законодательство
вина юридического лица
двойная форма вины
administrative offense
antimonopoly legislation
legal entity guilt
double form of guilt
url https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/525
work_keys_str_mv AT sergeissumenkov guiltofalegalentityinanadministrativeoffenseinthefieldofantimonopolylegislation
_version_ 1721311666373656576