Droplet Digital PCR Is an Improved Alternative Method for High-Quality Enumeration of Viable Probiotic Strains

• Main Authors: Sarah J. Z. Hansen, Peipei Tang, Anthony Kiefer, Kevin Galles, Connie Wong, Wesley Morovic
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
• Series: Frontiers in Microbiology
• Subjects: probiotic; enumeration; Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04; Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM; B. animalis subsp. lactis HN019; droplet digital PCR
• Online Access: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03025/full

Traditional microbiological enumeration methods have long been employed as the standard evaluation procedure for probiotic microorganisms. These methods are labor intensive, have long-time to results and inherently have a high degree of variability – up to 35%. As clinical probiotic and microbiome science continues to grow and develop, it is increasingly important that researchers thoroughly define and deliver the targeted probiotic dose. Furthermore, to establish high quality commercial products, the same dosage level must be administered to consumers. An ISO method for the use of flow cytometry has been established which does speed up the time to results and reduce variability, but the method has not yet gained widespread adoption across the probiotic industry. This is possibly due to expertise needed to implement and maintain a new testing platform in an established quality system. In this study we compare enumeration using plate counts and flow cytometry to the use of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which in addition to giving faster time to results than plate count and less variability than both plate count and flow cytometry, has additional benefits such as strain-specific counts. Use of ddPCR gives the ability to design primers to target deletions and single base pair differences which will allow for strain profiling in microbiome analyses. We demonstrate that ddPCR probiotic enumeration results are positively correlated to both plate count and flow cytometry results and should be considered a viable, next generation enumeration method for the evaluation of probiotics.