Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical Present

This essay argues, via Henri Bergson and Gilles Deleuze, that in distinction to a neoliberal notion of time that overlooks the present moment and past experience, Ben Lerner’s 10:04 posits the existence, in both its form and content, of a kind of freedom not imminent to or beyond the endless present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ralph Clare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2018-10-01
Series:Open Library of Humanities
Online Access:https://olh.openlibhums.org/article/id/4513/
id doaj-dc233475ab6a4d73b93876e734ebdbb8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc233475ab6a4d73b93876e734ebdbb82021-08-18T11:03:35ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesOpen Library of Humanities2056-67002018-10-014210.16995/olh.336Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical PresentRalph Clare0 This essay argues, via Henri Bergson and Gilles Deleuze, that in distinction to a neoliberal notion of time that overlooks the present moment and past experience, Ben Lerner’s 10:04 posits the existence, in both its form and content, of a kind of freedom not imminent to or beyond the endless presentism and debt-mortgaged non-future of neoliberal time but one that is immanent to and within it. The novel does so by stressing the way in which the actual, lived present, if properly attended to, gives rise to a virtual future containing multiple potentialities that have yet to be realized. What emerges is a deep sense of contemporaneity or affective time that heralds the potential of a nascent collective. 10:04 performs this notion in its very metafictional form(lessness) that calls attention to the fragility of both narrative and time that, particularly during moments of disruption, allow the subject to experience affectively an actual present carrying a virtual past into a future teeming with potentialities that a neoliberal temporality, in which the future is tamed by a drop down menu of preselected options, must deny. Thus, 10:04 reveals that we can experience a freedom to come within even the presentism of neoliberal temporality so that freedom after neoliberalism, as the novel’s Benjaminian influenced refrain suggests, will be “the same but a little different.”https://olh.openlibhums.org/article/id/4513/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ralph Clare
spellingShingle Ralph Clare
Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical Present
Open Library of Humanities
author_facet Ralph Clare
author_sort Ralph Clare
title Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical Present
title_short Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical Present
title_full Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical Present
title_fullStr Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical Present
title_full_unstemmed Freedom and Formlessness: Ben Lerner’s 10:04 and the Affective Historical Present
title_sort freedom and formlessness: ben lerner’s 10:04 and the affective historical present
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Open Library of Humanities
issn 2056-6700
publishDate 2018-10-01
description This essay argues, via Henri Bergson and Gilles Deleuze, that in distinction to a neoliberal notion of time that overlooks the present moment and past experience, Ben Lerner’s 10:04 posits the existence, in both its form and content, of a kind of freedom not imminent to or beyond the endless presentism and debt-mortgaged non-future of neoliberal time but one that is immanent to and within it. The novel does so by stressing the way in which the actual, lived present, if properly attended to, gives rise to a virtual future containing multiple potentialities that have yet to be realized. What emerges is a deep sense of contemporaneity or affective time that heralds the potential of a nascent collective. 10:04 performs this notion in its very metafictional form(lessness) that calls attention to the fragility of both narrative and time that, particularly during moments of disruption, allow the subject to experience affectively an actual present carrying a virtual past into a future teeming with potentialities that a neoliberal temporality, in which the future is tamed by a drop down menu of preselected options, must deny. Thus, 10:04 reveals that we can experience a freedom to come within even the presentism of neoliberal temporality so that freedom after neoliberalism, as the novel’s Benjaminian influenced refrain suggests, will be “the same but a little different.”
url https://olh.openlibhums.org/article/id/4513/
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphclare freedomandformlessnessbenlerners1004andtheaffectivehistoricalpresent
_version_ 1721203037749379072