Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?

<p>This article aims to analyze whether the legislation enacted in the field of public procurement in Romania, based on the 2014 EU Directives, is effective in fostering resilience of the public institutions and indirectly of communities, and to provide a fit-for-purpose mechanism for dealing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Alexandra Farca, Dacian Dragos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Babes Bolyai University 2020-12-01
Series:Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/645
id doaj-dc0ee237b3a449ddbc0bf8c8ffe1f566
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dc0ee237b3a449ddbc0bf8c8ffe1f5662021-06-30T05:52:07ZengBabes Bolyai UniversityTransylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences1842-28452020-12-0116SI607910.24193/tras.SI2020.4678Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?Laura Alexandra Farca0Dacian Dragos1Attorney-at-law, PhD candidate, Faculty of Law, Babeș Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaProfessor, Department of Public Administration and Management, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeș Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania<p>This article aims to analyze whether the legislation enacted in the field of public procurement in Romania, based on the 2014 EU Directives, is effective in fostering resilience of the public institutions and indirectly of communities, and to provide a fit-for-purpose mechanism for dealing with the pandemic generated by the new type of coronavirus, Sars-CoV-2. The article discusses the necessity of new rules meant to promote swiftly purchases during the state of emergency.</p><p>Undoubtedly, the pandemic generated crisis has raised some serious challenges to which public procurement regulations is in principle properly equipped to deal with: urgent need for supplies, works and services, but also unemployment or protection of other disadvantaged categories of people. We argue that resorting to specific tools (negotiated procedures, framework-agreements, centralized procurement, sustainable and social procurement, reserved contracts) when carrying out swift interventions generated by the pandemic would have been more suitable during this health crisis or even for preventing the effects of this pandemic. Instead, the attention of the legislator has been concentrated only on (unnecessarily) exempting the swift purchases of medical equipment from the rule of law.</p>https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/645resilienceemergency statepublic procurementtransparencyinfringement.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Alexandra Farca
Dacian Dragos
spellingShingle Laura Alexandra Farca
Dacian Dragos
Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
resilience
emergency state
public procurement
transparency
infringement.
author_facet Laura Alexandra Farca
Dacian Dragos
author_sort Laura Alexandra Farca
title Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?
title_short Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?
title_full Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?
title_fullStr Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?
title_full_unstemmed Resilience in Times Of Pandemic: Is the Public Procurement Legal Framework Fit for Purpose?
title_sort resilience in times of pandemic: is the public procurement legal framework fit for purpose?
publisher Babes Bolyai University
series Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
issn 1842-2845
publishDate 2020-12-01
description <p>This article aims to analyze whether the legislation enacted in the field of public procurement in Romania, based on the 2014 EU Directives, is effective in fostering resilience of the public institutions and indirectly of communities, and to provide a fit-for-purpose mechanism for dealing with the pandemic generated by the new type of coronavirus, Sars-CoV-2. The article discusses the necessity of new rules meant to promote swiftly purchases during the state of emergency.</p><p>Undoubtedly, the pandemic generated crisis has raised some serious challenges to which public procurement regulations is in principle properly equipped to deal with: urgent need for supplies, works and services, but also unemployment or protection of other disadvantaged categories of people. We argue that resorting to specific tools (negotiated procedures, framework-agreements, centralized procurement, sustainable and social procurement, reserved contracts) when carrying out swift interventions generated by the pandemic would have been more suitable during this health crisis or even for preventing the effects of this pandemic. Instead, the attention of the legislator has been concentrated only on (unnecessarily) exempting the swift purchases of medical equipment from the rule of law.</p>
topic resilience
emergency state
public procurement
transparency
infringement.
url https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/645
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraalexandrafarca resilienceintimesofpandemicisthepublicprocurementlegalframeworkfitforpurpose
AT daciandragos resilienceintimesofpandemicisthepublicprocurementlegalframeworkfitforpurpose
_version_ 1721353286738509824