Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents

The ‘network’ is a powerful concept and metaphor, a tool for and focus of much recent research and scholarship. We envisage our very world as ‘networked.’ ‘The network’ also has aesthetic or formal possibilities: in the interconnected, reticular, knotted or participatory work. Interest in networks f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Finn FORDHAM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gaziantep University 2019-12-01
Series:Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917114
id doaj-dbe402f4332c47f4a5c28ea362bc6785
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dbe402f4332c47f4a5c28ea362bc67852020-11-25T02:45:40ZengGaziantep UniversityGaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences1303-00942149-54592019-12-0118Special Issue11510.21547/jss.603867Mapping Cultural Networks and its DiscontentsFinn FORDHAM0Royal Halloway University of LondonThe ‘network’ is a powerful concept and metaphor, a tool for and focus of much recent research and scholarship. We envisage our very world as ‘networked.’ ‘The network’ also has aesthetic or formal possibilities: in the interconnected, reticular, knotted or participatory work. Interest in networks from within literary study arose arguably out of cultural history and sociology, where a ‘social text’ was imagined, partly as a means to displace an outmoded focus on the single author, the autonomous individual, the heroic genius. Readers and texts are imagined together forming ‘networks’ of meaning, feeling, and judgement. But do we take the concept for granted? Though powerful as a tool, is it also somewhat blunt? Can we ever succeed in ‘mapping’ a cultural network, or describing one accurately? Is the metaphor too knotty or nodal for the fluid forms it hopes to catch in its structures? What absences does this metaphor forget? Do we overvalue the notion of a network from the context of our own professional networks, at the cost of forgetting the disconnected? Does disconnection from the ideas of disconnection explain the shock and surprise at how recent democratic processes unfolded? Referring to my research that considers formations and disruptions of cultural networks and of value at the outbreak of World War 2, and to representations of data in the Digital Humanities, my paper addresses these questions amongst others. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917114networksdigital humanitiesdisconnection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Finn FORDHAM
spellingShingle Finn FORDHAM
Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
networks
digital humanities
disconnection
author_facet Finn FORDHAM
author_sort Finn FORDHAM
title Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents
title_short Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents
title_full Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents
title_fullStr Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents
title_sort mapping cultural networks and its discontents
publisher Gaziantep University
series Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
issn 1303-0094
2149-5459
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The ‘network’ is a powerful concept and metaphor, a tool for and focus of much recent research and scholarship. We envisage our very world as ‘networked.’ ‘The network’ also has aesthetic or formal possibilities: in the interconnected, reticular, knotted or participatory work. Interest in networks from within literary study arose arguably out of cultural history and sociology, where a ‘social text’ was imagined, partly as a means to displace an outmoded focus on the single author, the autonomous individual, the heroic genius. Readers and texts are imagined together forming ‘networks’ of meaning, feeling, and judgement. But do we take the concept for granted? Though powerful as a tool, is it also somewhat blunt? Can we ever succeed in ‘mapping’ a cultural network, or describing one accurately? Is the metaphor too knotty or nodal for the fluid forms it hopes to catch in its structures? What absences does this metaphor forget? Do we overvalue the notion of a network from the context of our own professional networks, at the cost of forgetting the disconnected? Does disconnection from the ideas of disconnection explain the shock and surprise at how recent democratic processes unfolded? Referring to my research that considers formations and disruptions of cultural networks and of value at the outbreak of World War 2, and to representations of data in the Digital Humanities, my paper addresses these questions amongst others.
topic networks
digital humanities
disconnection
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917114
work_keys_str_mv AT finnfordham mappingculturalnetworksanditsdiscontents
_version_ 1724761123130966016