Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents
The ‘network’ is a powerful concept and metaphor, a tool for and focus of much recent research and scholarship. We envisage our very world as ‘networked.’ ‘The network’ also has aesthetic or formal possibilities: in the interconnected, reticular, knotted or participatory work. Interest in networks f...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Gaziantep University
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917114 |
id |
doaj-dbe402f4332c47f4a5c28ea362bc6785 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dbe402f4332c47f4a5c28ea362bc67852020-11-25T02:45:40ZengGaziantep UniversityGaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences1303-00942149-54592019-12-0118Special Issue11510.21547/jss.603867Mapping Cultural Networks and its DiscontentsFinn FORDHAM0Royal Halloway University of LondonThe ‘network’ is a powerful concept and metaphor, a tool for and focus of much recent research and scholarship. We envisage our very world as ‘networked.’ ‘The network’ also has aesthetic or formal possibilities: in the interconnected, reticular, knotted or participatory work. Interest in networks from within literary study arose arguably out of cultural history and sociology, where a ‘social text’ was imagined, partly as a means to displace an outmoded focus on the single author, the autonomous individual, the heroic genius. Readers and texts are imagined together forming ‘networks’ of meaning, feeling, and judgement. But do we take the concept for granted? Though powerful as a tool, is it also somewhat blunt? Can we ever succeed in ‘mapping’ a cultural network, or describing one accurately? Is the metaphor too knotty or nodal for the fluid forms it hopes to catch in its structures? What absences does this metaphor forget? Do we overvalue the notion of a network from the context of our own professional networks, at the cost of forgetting the disconnected? Does disconnection from the ideas of disconnection explain the shock and surprise at how recent democratic processes unfolded? Referring to my research that considers formations and disruptions of cultural networks and of value at the outbreak of World War 2, and to representations of data in the Digital Humanities, my paper addresses these questions amongst others. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917114networksdigital humanitiesdisconnection |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Finn FORDHAM |
spellingShingle |
Finn FORDHAM Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences networks digital humanities disconnection |
author_facet |
Finn FORDHAM |
author_sort |
Finn FORDHAM |
title |
Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents |
title_short |
Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents |
title_full |
Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents |
title_fullStr |
Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mapping Cultural Networks and its Discontents |
title_sort |
mapping cultural networks and its discontents |
publisher |
Gaziantep University |
series |
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences |
issn |
1303-0094 2149-5459 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
The ‘network’ is a powerful concept and metaphor, a tool for and focus of much recent research and scholarship. We envisage our very world as ‘networked.’ ‘The network’ also has aesthetic or formal possibilities: in the interconnected, reticular, knotted or participatory work. Interest in networks from within literary study arose arguably out of cultural history and sociology, where a ‘social text’ was imagined, partly as a means to displace an outmoded focus on the single author, the autonomous individual, the heroic genius. Readers and texts are imagined together forming ‘networks’ of meaning, feeling, and judgement. But do we take the concept for granted? Though powerful as a tool, is it also somewhat blunt? Can we ever succeed in ‘mapping’ a cultural network, or describing one accurately? Is the metaphor too knotty or nodal for the fluid forms it hopes to catch in its structures? What absences does this metaphor forget? Do we overvalue the notion of a network from the context of our own professional networks, at the cost of forgetting the disconnected? Does disconnection from the ideas of disconnection explain the shock and surprise at how recent democratic processes unfolded? Referring to my research that considers formations and disruptions of cultural networks and of value at the outbreak of World War 2, and to representations of data in the Digital Humanities, my paper addresses these questions amongst others. |
topic |
networks digital humanities disconnection |
url |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917114 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT finnfordham mappingculturalnetworksanditsdiscontents |
_version_ |
1724761123130966016 |