Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media Data

The article examines whether and how the ever-evolving practice of using social media to screen job applicants may undermine people’s trust in the organizations that are engaging in this practice. Using a survey of 429 participants, we assess whether their comfort level with cybervetting can be expl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anatoliy Gruzd, Jenna Jacobson, Elizabeth Dubois
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-04-01
Series:Social Media + Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915618
id doaj-dbd6f0acd3824f0590a83160bc64b754
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dbd6f0acd3824f0590a83160bc64b7542020-11-25T03:26:54ZengSAGE PublishingSocial Media + Society2056-30512020-04-01610.1177/2056305120915618Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media DataAnatoliy Gruzd0Jenna Jacobson1Elizabeth Dubois2Ryerson University, CanadaRyerson University, CanadaUniversity of Ottawa, CanadaThe article examines whether and how the ever-evolving practice of using social media to screen job applicants may undermine people’s trust in the organizations that are engaging in this practice. Using a survey of 429 participants, we assess whether their comfort level with cybervetting can be explained by the factors outlined by Petronio’s communication privacy management theory: culture, gender, motivation, and risk-benefit ratio. We find that respondents from India are significantly more comfortable with social media screening than those living in the United States. We did not find any gender-based differences in individuals’ comfort with social media screening, which suggests that there may be some consistent set of norms, expectations, or “privacy rules” that apply in the context of employment seeking—irrespective of gender. As a theoretical contribution, we apply the communication privacy management theory to analyze information that is publicly available, which offers a unique extension of the theory that focuses on private information. Importantly, the research suggests that privacy boundaries are not only important when it comes to private information, but also with information that is publicly available on social media. The research identifies that just because social media data are public, does not mean people do not have context-specific and data-specific expectations of privacy.https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915618
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anatoliy Gruzd
Jenna Jacobson
Elizabeth Dubois
spellingShingle Anatoliy Gruzd
Jenna Jacobson
Elizabeth Dubois
Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media Data
Social Media + Society
author_facet Anatoliy Gruzd
Jenna Jacobson
Elizabeth Dubois
author_sort Anatoliy Gruzd
title Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media Data
title_short Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media Data
title_full Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media Data
title_fullStr Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media Data
title_full_unstemmed Cybervetting and the Public Life of Social Media Data
title_sort cybervetting and the public life of social media data
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Social Media + Society
issn 2056-3051
publishDate 2020-04-01
description The article examines whether and how the ever-evolving practice of using social media to screen job applicants may undermine people’s trust in the organizations that are engaging in this practice. Using a survey of 429 participants, we assess whether their comfort level with cybervetting can be explained by the factors outlined by Petronio’s communication privacy management theory: culture, gender, motivation, and risk-benefit ratio. We find that respondents from India are significantly more comfortable with social media screening than those living in the United States. We did not find any gender-based differences in individuals’ comfort with social media screening, which suggests that there may be some consistent set of norms, expectations, or “privacy rules” that apply in the context of employment seeking—irrespective of gender. As a theoretical contribution, we apply the communication privacy management theory to analyze information that is publicly available, which offers a unique extension of the theory that focuses on private information. Importantly, the research suggests that privacy boundaries are not only important when it comes to private information, but also with information that is publicly available on social media. The research identifies that just because social media data are public, does not mean people do not have context-specific and data-specific expectations of privacy.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915618
work_keys_str_mv AT anatoliygruzd cybervettingandthepubliclifeofsocialmediadata
AT jennajacobson cybervettingandthepubliclifeofsocialmediadata
AT elizabethdubois cybervettingandthepubliclifeofsocialmediadata
_version_ 1724590684868968448