Denying the Antecedent: The Fallacy That Never Was, or Sometimes Isn’t?
Abstract: In this paper we examine two challenges to the orthodox understanding of the fallacy of denying the antecedent. One challenge is to say that passages thought to express the fallacy can usually be given an interpretation on which they express valid arguments, entitling us to query whether t...
Main Authors: | Luis Duarte d’Almeida, Euan MacDonald |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4469 |
Similar Items
-
Denying the Antecedent: The Fallacy That Never Was, or Sometimes Isn’t?
by: Luis Duarte d’Almeida, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01) -
Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art
by: David Godden, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Did Jesus Commit a Fallacy?
by: Aaron Ben-Zeev
Published: (1995-01-01) -
Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation
by: Mark A. Stone
Published: (2012-09-01) -
Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation
by: Mark A. Stone
Published: (2012-09-01)