Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater

Landfill leachate and municipal wastewater at various ratios (1:20, 1:10, 1:7 and 1:5) were subjected to coagulation and electrocoagulation (EC). Alum was used in conventional coagulation at pH 6 and aluminum plate as electrode was used in EC at a current density of 386 A/m2 with 5 cm inter electrod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohini Verma, R. Naresh Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2018-04-01
Series:Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jwrd.iwaponline.com/content/8/2/234
id doaj-dbafc13965d34b52a3f7fcde78963342
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dbafc13965d34b52a3f7fcde789633422020-11-25T02:17:42ZengIWA PublishingJournal of Water Reuse and Desalination2220-13192408-93702018-04-018223424310.2166/wrd.2017.102102Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewaterMohini Verma0R. Naresh Kumar1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, India Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, India Landfill leachate and municipal wastewater at various ratios (1:20, 1:10, 1:7 and 1:5) were subjected to coagulation and electrocoagulation (EC). Alum was used in conventional coagulation at pH 6 and aluminum plate as electrode was used in EC at a current density of 386 A/m2 with 5 cm inter electrode spacing. Treatment efficiency was assessed from removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, ammonia, nitrate and phosphate. At 1:5 ratio of landfill leachate to municipal wastewater, highest COD removal was with 3.8 g/L alum whereas highest turbidity removal was with 3.3 g/L alum during coagulation. EC exhibited almost similar removal efficiency for all the parameters at different ratios tested except for COD which was considerably higher at 1:20 ratio. Aluminum consumption from electrode was 0.7 g/L following EC as compared to 3.8 g/L alum used in coagulation. The amount of sludge produced was found to be higher with EC as compared to coagulation which could be due to the fact that the electrochemical method was performed for a longer duration than conventional coagulation. For minimal sludge generation, EC reaction time should be ∼30 min. Further studies with EC process on costing and sludge generation will help to advance the technology for wastewater treatment.http://jwrd.iwaponline.com/content/8/2/234aluminum electrodealuminum sulphatecoagulationelectrocoagulationlandfill leachatemunicipal wastewater
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohini Verma
R. Naresh Kumar
spellingShingle Mohini Verma
R. Naresh Kumar
Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
aluminum electrode
aluminum sulphate
coagulation
electrocoagulation
landfill leachate
municipal wastewater
author_facet Mohini Verma
R. Naresh Kumar
author_sort Mohini Verma
title Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater
title_short Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater
title_full Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater
title_fullStr Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater
title_sort coagulation and electrocoagulation for co-treatment of stabilized landfill leachate and municipal wastewater
publisher IWA Publishing
series Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
issn 2220-1319
2408-9370
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Landfill leachate and municipal wastewater at various ratios (1:20, 1:10, 1:7 and 1:5) were subjected to coagulation and electrocoagulation (EC). Alum was used in conventional coagulation at pH 6 and aluminum plate as electrode was used in EC at a current density of 386 A/m2 with 5 cm inter electrode spacing. Treatment efficiency was assessed from removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, ammonia, nitrate and phosphate. At 1:5 ratio of landfill leachate to municipal wastewater, highest COD removal was with 3.8 g/L alum whereas highest turbidity removal was with 3.3 g/L alum during coagulation. EC exhibited almost similar removal efficiency for all the parameters at different ratios tested except for COD which was considerably higher at 1:20 ratio. Aluminum consumption from electrode was 0.7 g/L following EC as compared to 3.8 g/L alum used in coagulation. The amount of sludge produced was found to be higher with EC as compared to coagulation which could be due to the fact that the electrochemical method was performed for a longer duration than conventional coagulation. For minimal sludge generation, EC reaction time should be ∼30 min. Further studies with EC process on costing and sludge generation will help to advance the technology for wastewater treatment.
topic aluminum electrode
aluminum sulphate
coagulation
electrocoagulation
landfill leachate
municipal wastewater
url http://jwrd.iwaponline.com/content/8/2/234
work_keys_str_mv AT mohiniverma coagulationandelectrocoagulationforcotreatmentofstabilizedlandfillleachateandmunicipalwastewater
AT rnareshkumar coagulationandelectrocoagulationforcotreatmentofstabilizedlandfillleachateandmunicipalwastewater
_version_ 1724885678900117504