Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?

People often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea eBender, Annelie eRothe-Wulf, Lisa eHüther, Sieghard eBeller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486/full
id doaj-dba9d602f2074333ab7c15740f7c83f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dba9d602f2074333ab7c15740f7c83f92020-11-24T22:39:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782012-11-01310.3389/fpsyg.2012.0048632080Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?Andrea eBender0Andrea eBender1Annelie eRothe-Wulf2Lisa eHüther3Sieghard eBeller4Sieghard eBeller5Sieghard eBeller6University of FreiburgBielefeld UniversityUniversity of FreiburgUniversity of FreiburgUniversity of PaderbornUniversity of FreiburgBielefeld UniversityPeople often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptualize time and, more specifically, that the preferences for spatial FoRs should carry over to the domain of time. Here, we scrutinize this assumption (a) by reviewing data from recent studies on temporal references, (b) by comparing data we had collected in previous studies on preferences for spatial and temporal FoRs in four languages, (c) by analyzing new data from dynamic spatial tasks that resemble the temporal tasks more closely, and (d) by assessing the co-variation of individual preferences of English speakers across space and time. While the first set of data paints a mixed picture, the latter three do not support the assumption of a close link between referencing preferences across domains. We explore possible reasons for this lack of consistency and discuss implications for research on temporal references.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486/fullspacetimeframes of referencecross-linguistic comparisondynamic settings
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea eBender
Andrea eBender
Annelie eRothe-Wulf
Lisa eHüther
Sieghard eBeller
Sieghard eBeller
Sieghard eBeller
spellingShingle Andrea eBender
Andrea eBender
Annelie eRothe-Wulf
Lisa eHüther
Sieghard eBeller
Sieghard eBeller
Sieghard eBeller
Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?
Frontiers in Psychology
space
time
frames of reference
cross-linguistic comparison
dynamic settings
author_facet Andrea eBender
Andrea eBender
Annelie eRothe-Wulf
Lisa eHüther
Sieghard eBeller
Sieghard eBeller
Sieghard eBeller
author_sort Andrea eBender
title Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?
title_short Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?
title_full Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?
title_fullStr Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?
title_full_unstemmed Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)?
title_sort moving forward in space and time: how strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (fors)?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2012-11-01
description People often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptualize time and, more specifically, that the preferences for spatial FoRs should carry over to the domain of time. Here, we scrutinize this assumption (a) by reviewing data from recent studies on temporal references, (b) by comparing data we had collected in previous studies on preferences for spatial and temporal FoRs in four languages, (c) by analyzing new data from dynamic spatial tasks that resemble the temporal tasks more closely, and (d) by assessing the co-variation of individual preferences of English speakers across space and time. While the first set of data paints a mixed picture, the latter three do not support the assumption of a close link between referencing preferences across domains. We explore possible reasons for this lack of consistency and discuss implications for research on temporal references.
topic space
time
frames of reference
cross-linguistic comparison
dynamic settings
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaebender movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreferencefors
AT andreaebender movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreferencefors
AT annelieerothewulf movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreferencefors
AT lisaehuther movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreferencefors
AT sieghardebeller movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreferencefors
AT sieghardebeller movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreferencefors
AT sieghardebeller movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreferencefors
_version_ 1725709453167165440