On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background:</p> <p>The origin of microbial ORFans, ORFs having no detectable homology to other ORFs in the databases, is one of the unexplained puzzles of the post-genomic era. Several hypothesis on the origin of ORFans have been suggested in the last...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fischer Daniel, Yin Yanbin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-08-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/6/63
id doaj-db92391bad90444d98e238b57d56a715
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db92391bad90444d98e238b57d56a7152021-09-02T07:25:33ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482006-08-01616310.1186/1471-2148-6-63On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transferFischer DanielYin Yanbin<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background:</p> <p>The origin of microbial ORFans, ORFs having no detectable homology to other ORFs in the databases, is one of the unexplained puzzles of the post-genomic era. Several hypothesis on the origin of ORFans have been suggested in the last few years, most of which based on selected, relatively small, subsets of ORFans. One of the hypotheses for the origin of ORFans is that they have been acquired thru lateral transfer from viruses. Here we carry out a comprehensive, genome-wide study on the origins of ORFans to quantify the strength of current evidence supporting this hypothesis.</p> <p>Results:</p> <p>We performed similarity searches by querying all current ORFans against the public virus protein database. Surprisingly, we found that only 2.8% of all microbial ORFans have detectable homologs in viruses, while the percentage of non-ORFans with detectable homologs in viruses is 7.9%, a significantly higher figure. This suggests that the current evidence for the origin of ORFans from lateral transfer from viruses is at best weak. However, an analysis of individual genomes revealed a number of organisms with much higher percentages, many of them belonging to the Firmicutes and Gamma-proteobacteria. We provide evidence suggesting that the current virus database may be biased towards those viruses attacking Firmicutes and Gamma-proteobacteria.</p> <p>Conclusion:</p> <p>We conclude that as more viral genomes are sequenced, more microbial ORFans will find homologs in viruses, but this trend may vary much for individual genomes. Thus, lateral transfer from viruses alone is unlikely to explain the origin of the majority of ORFans in the majority of prokaryotes and consequently, other, not necessarily exclusive, mechanisms are likely to better explain the origin of the increasing number of ORFans.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/6/63
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fischer Daniel
Yin Yanbin
spellingShingle Fischer Daniel
Yin Yanbin
On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer
BMC Evolutionary Biology
author_facet Fischer Daniel
Yin Yanbin
author_sort Fischer Daniel
title On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer
title_short On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer
title_full On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer
title_fullStr On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer
title_full_unstemmed On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer
title_sort on the origin of microbial orfans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer
publisher BMC
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
issn 1471-2148
publishDate 2006-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background:</p> <p>The origin of microbial ORFans, ORFs having no detectable homology to other ORFs in the databases, is one of the unexplained puzzles of the post-genomic era. Several hypothesis on the origin of ORFans have been suggested in the last few years, most of which based on selected, relatively small, subsets of ORFans. One of the hypotheses for the origin of ORFans is that they have been acquired thru lateral transfer from viruses. Here we carry out a comprehensive, genome-wide study on the origins of ORFans to quantify the strength of current evidence supporting this hypothesis.</p> <p>Results:</p> <p>We performed similarity searches by querying all current ORFans against the public virus protein database. Surprisingly, we found that only 2.8% of all microbial ORFans have detectable homologs in viruses, while the percentage of non-ORFans with detectable homologs in viruses is 7.9%, a significantly higher figure. This suggests that the current evidence for the origin of ORFans from lateral transfer from viruses is at best weak. However, an analysis of individual genomes revealed a number of organisms with much higher percentages, many of them belonging to the Firmicutes and Gamma-proteobacteria. We provide evidence suggesting that the current virus database may be biased towards those viruses attacking Firmicutes and Gamma-proteobacteria.</p> <p>Conclusion:</p> <p>We conclude that as more viral genomes are sequenced, more microbial ORFans will find homologs in viruses, but this trend may vary much for individual genomes. Thus, lateral transfer from viruses alone is unlikely to explain the origin of the majority of ORFans in the majority of prokaryotes and consequently, other, not necessarily exclusive, mechanisms are likely to better explain the origin of the increasing number of ORFans.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/6/63
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerdaniel ontheoriginofmicrobialorfansquantifyingthestrengthoftheevidenceforvirallateraltransfer
AT yinyanbin ontheoriginofmicrobialorfansquantifyingthestrengthoftheevidenceforvirallateraltransfer
_version_ 1721178530480390144