The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability Judgments
Acceptability judgments have been an important tool in language research. By asking a native speaker whether a linguistic token is acceptable, linguists and psycholinguists can collect negative evidence and directly test predictions by linguistic and psycholinguistic theories, which provide importan...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00073/full |
id |
doaj-db7d5a6158314c03a9c9d9ce5479cf68 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-db7d5a6158314c03a9c9d9ce5479cf682020-11-25T01:58:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-01-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.00073498268The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability JudgmentsYujing HuangFernanda FerreiraAcceptability judgments have been an important tool in language research. By asking a native speaker whether a linguistic token is acceptable, linguists and psycholinguists can collect negative evidence and directly test predictions by linguistic and psycholinguistic theories, which provide important insight into the human language capacity. In this paper, we first give a brief overview of this method including: (1) the linking hypothesis for this method, (2) the controversy about the test, and (3) limitations of the current analysis of the results. Then, we propose a new way of analyzing the data: Signal Detection Theory. Signal Detection Theory has been used in many other psychological research areas such as recognition memory and clinical assessments. In this paper, using two examples, we show how Signal Detection Theory can be applied to judgment data. The benefits of this approach are that it can: (1) show how well participants can differentiate the acceptable sentences from unacceptable ones and (2) describe the participant’s bias in the judgment. We conclude with a discussion of remaining questions and future directions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00073/fullsignal detection theoryacceptability judgmentsd-primeresponse biasone-factor designtwo-factor design |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yujing Huang Fernanda Ferreira |
spellingShingle |
Yujing Huang Fernanda Ferreira The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability Judgments Frontiers in Psychology signal detection theory acceptability judgments d-prime response bias one-factor design two-factor design |
author_facet |
Yujing Huang Fernanda Ferreira |
author_sort |
Yujing Huang |
title |
The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability Judgments |
title_short |
The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability Judgments |
title_full |
The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability Judgments |
title_fullStr |
The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability Judgments |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Acceptability Judgments |
title_sort |
application of signal detection theory to acceptability judgments |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Acceptability judgments have been an important tool in language research. By asking a native speaker whether a linguistic token is acceptable, linguists and psycholinguists can collect negative evidence and directly test predictions by linguistic and psycholinguistic theories, which provide important insight into the human language capacity. In this paper, we first give a brief overview of this method including: (1) the linking hypothesis for this method, (2) the controversy about the test, and (3) limitations of the current analysis of the results. Then, we propose a new way of analyzing the data: Signal Detection Theory. Signal Detection Theory has been used in many other psychological research areas such as recognition memory and clinical assessments. In this paper, using two examples, we show how Signal Detection Theory can be applied to judgment data. The benefits of this approach are that it can: (1) show how well participants can differentiate the acceptable sentences from unacceptable ones and (2) describe the participant’s bias in the judgment. We conclude with a discussion of remaining questions and future directions. |
topic |
signal detection theory acceptability judgments d-prime response bias one-factor design two-factor design |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00073/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yujinghuang theapplicationofsignaldetectiontheorytoacceptabilityjudgments AT fernandaferreira theapplicationofsignaldetectiontheorytoacceptabilityjudgments AT yujinghuang applicationofsignaldetectiontheorytoacceptabilityjudgments AT fernandaferreira applicationofsignaldetectiontheorytoacceptabilityjudgments |
_version_ |
1724969344983629824 |