Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?

Abstract. Seventy years after its discovery, studies of the myriad properties, and potential disease associations of uromodulin are now burgeoning. Although normative ranges for serum/plasma uromodulin concentrations were established over 30 years ago, their external validation occurred only in very...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew G. Bostom, MD, Dominik Steubl, MD, Allon N. Friedman, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2017-11-01
Series:Transplantation Direct
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000737
id doaj-db77df2133ce4371b7624358e2539269
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db77df2133ce4371b7624358e25392692020-11-24T21:37:09ZengWolters KluwerTransplantation Direct2373-87312017-11-01311e21910.1097/TXD.0000000000000737201711000-0001Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?Andrew G. Bostom, MD0Dominik Steubl, MD1Allon N. Friedman, MD21 Center For Primary Care and Prevention, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI.2 Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.3 Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.Abstract. Seventy years after its discovery, studies of the myriad properties, and potential disease associations of uromodulin are now burgeoning. Although normative ranges for serum/plasma uromodulin concentrations were established over 30 years ago, their external validation occurred only in very recent, larger studies. As tubular function indices, serum and urinary uromodulin may be more sensitive indicators of kidney graft dysfunction undetected by glomerular filtration markers, or proteinuria. Moreover, 2 sizable, just published longitudinal reports revealed that lower serum uromodulin levels were associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, total mortality, and infectious disease deaths, in patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease. Preliminary longitudinal studies have reported that reduced levels of plasma or serum uromodulin were linked to progression to end-stage renal disease in chronic kidney disease patients, and graft failure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Conflicting data on the associations, or lack thereof, between lower urinary uromodulin concentrations and accelerated loss of renal function, or renal failure, in nontransplant chronic kidney disease patients, are perhaps due, in part, to analytical limitations in determining urine uromodulin. Potential longitudinal associations between serum and urinary uromodulin concentrations, and CVD outcomes, graft failure, and all-cause mortality, await validation in large, diverse cohorts of chronic KTRs. Taking advantage of an efficient case-cohort design scheme, we demonstrate how the completed FAVORIT clinical trial cohort might be ideally suited to evaluate these associations. Using available case-cohort sample data, statistical power simulations are provided to detect relative risk estimates of 1.50 for CVD (n = 309 events), 1.56 for graft failure (n = 223 events) or 1.50 for death from any cause (n = 320 events), comparing values below the median, to values equal to or above the median for serum uromodulin values. Edifying data such as these would advance our understanding of the hypothetical utility of uromodulin measurement in KTRs considerably.http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000737
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew G. Bostom, MD
Dominik Steubl, MD
Allon N. Friedman, MD
spellingShingle Andrew G. Bostom, MD
Dominik Steubl, MD
Allon N. Friedman, MD
Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?
Transplantation Direct
author_facet Andrew G. Bostom, MD
Dominik Steubl, MD
Allon N. Friedman, MD
author_sort Andrew G. Bostom, MD
title Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?
title_short Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?
title_full Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?
title_fullStr Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?
title_full_unstemmed Hypothesis: Potential Utility of Serum and Urine Uromodulin Measurement in Kidney Transplant Recipients?
title_sort hypothesis: potential utility of serum and urine uromodulin measurement in kidney transplant recipients?
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Transplantation Direct
issn 2373-8731
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Abstract. Seventy years after its discovery, studies of the myriad properties, and potential disease associations of uromodulin are now burgeoning. Although normative ranges for serum/plasma uromodulin concentrations were established over 30 years ago, their external validation occurred only in very recent, larger studies. As tubular function indices, serum and urinary uromodulin may be more sensitive indicators of kidney graft dysfunction undetected by glomerular filtration markers, or proteinuria. Moreover, 2 sizable, just published longitudinal reports revealed that lower serum uromodulin levels were associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, total mortality, and infectious disease deaths, in patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease. Preliminary longitudinal studies have reported that reduced levels of plasma or serum uromodulin were linked to progression to end-stage renal disease in chronic kidney disease patients, and graft failure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Conflicting data on the associations, or lack thereof, between lower urinary uromodulin concentrations and accelerated loss of renal function, or renal failure, in nontransplant chronic kidney disease patients, are perhaps due, in part, to analytical limitations in determining urine uromodulin. Potential longitudinal associations between serum and urinary uromodulin concentrations, and CVD outcomes, graft failure, and all-cause mortality, await validation in large, diverse cohorts of chronic KTRs. Taking advantage of an efficient case-cohort design scheme, we demonstrate how the completed FAVORIT clinical trial cohort might be ideally suited to evaluate these associations. Using available case-cohort sample data, statistical power simulations are provided to detect relative risk estimates of 1.50 for CVD (n = 309 events), 1.56 for graft failure (n = 223 events) or 1.50 for death from any cause (n = 320 events), comparing values below the median, to values equal to or above the median for serum uromodulin values. Edifying data such as these would advance our understanding of the hypothetical utility of uromodulin measurement in KTRs considerably.
url http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000737
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewgbostommd hypothesispotentialutilityofserumandurineuromodulinmeasurementinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT dominiksteublmd hypothesispotentialutilityofserumandurineuromodulinmeasurementinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT allonnfriedmanmd hypothesispotentialutilityofserumandurineuromodulinmeasurementinkidneytransplantrecipients
_version_ 1725937962864082944