Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study

Introduction: Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection, in context of rapid application, approximation of the skin edges, economy and aesthetics of the resultant scar. Aim: (1) To compare surgical stainless steel s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abhishek Ghosh, Madan Nanjappa, Vaibhav Nagaraj, G C Rajkumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2015;volume=6;issue=5;spage=51;epage=55;aulast=Ghosh
id doaj-db6a20ff46cb4ffdb316b57edb1dcab4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db6a20ff46cb4ffdb316b57edb1dcab42020-11-24T23:34:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612015-01-0165515510.4103/0976-237X.152938Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical studyAbhishek GhoshMadan NanjappaVaibhav NagarajG C RajkumarIntroduction: Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection, in context of rapid application, approximation of the skin edges, economy and aesthetics of the resultant scar. Aim: (1) To compare surgical stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary wound closure, with respect to presence/absence of wound infection and dehiscence (2) To compare the resultant scar following the two different methods of the closure at 3 rd month postoperatively with the help of visual analog scale and analyze the result statistically Design: This study was designed to compare skin closure using staples and silk sutures in patients undergoing neck dissection, using both methods in one-half of the same wound; thus each wound affording its own control. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on patients requiring collar line incision (high submandibular incision) with or without a cephalad extension of midline lower lip split incision for surgical access, who presented to the Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery. (1) Sample size: 10 (2) Study design: Prospective Comparative study (3) Study duration: One and half years (4) Surgical stainless steel staples: Proximate Plus MD 35 W, Ethicon Endo Surgery (5) Sutures: 3-0 Ethiprime NW 5003, Non-Absorbable Surgical Suture, Mersilk-90 cm, Ethicon, (16 mm 3/8 circle cutting needle). Conclusion: It wass concluded that there is no significant difference between the scars observed in the regions of incision which underwent primary closure by two different methods, that is surgical stainless steel staples and 3-0 Mersilk Sutures.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2015;volume=6;issue=5;spage=51;epage=55;aulast=GhoshNeck incisionssilkstaples
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abhishek Ghosh
Madan Nanjappa
Vaibhav Nagaraj
G C Rajkumar
spellingShingle Abhishek Ghosh
Madan Nanjappa
Vaibhav Nagaraj
G C Rajkumar
Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Neck incisions
silk
staples
author_facet Abhishek Ghosh
Madan Nanjappa
Vaibhav Nagaraj
G C Rajkumar
author_sort Abhishek Ghosh
title Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study
title_short Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study
title_full Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study
title_fullStr Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study
title_sort comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: a comparative clinical study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
issn 0976-237X
0976-2361
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Introduction: Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection, in context of rapid application, approximation of the skin edges, economy and aesthetics of the resultant scar. Aim: (1) To compare surgical stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary wound closure, with respect to presence/absence of wound infection and dehiscence (2) To compare the resultant scar following the two different methods of the closure at 3 rd month postoperatively with the help of visual analog scale and analyze the result statistically Design: This study was designed to compare skin closure using staples and silk sutures in patients undergoing neck dissection, using both methods in one-half of the same wound; thus each wound affording its own control. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on patients requiring collar line incision (high submandibular incision) with or without a cephalad extension of midline lower lip split incision for surgical access, who presented to the Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery. (1) Sample size: 10 (2) Study design: Prospective Comparative study (3) Study duration: One and half years (4) Surgical stainless steel staples: Proximate Plus MD 35 W, Ethicon Endo Surgery (5) Sutures: 3-0 Ethiprime NW 5003, Non-Absorbable Surgical Suture, Mersilk-90 cm, Ethicon, (16 mm 3/8 circle cutting needle). Conclusion: It wass concluded that there is no significant difference between the scars observed in the regions of incision which underwent primary closure by two different methods, that is surgical stainless steel staples and 3-0 Mersilk Sutures.
topic Neck incisions
silk
staples
url http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2015;volume=6;issue=5;spage=51;epage=55;aulast=Ghosh
work_keys_str_mv AT abhishekghosh comparisonbetweenstainlesssteelstaplesandsilksuturesforprimaryclosureofskininpatientsundergoingneckdissectionacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT madannanjappa comparisonbetweenstainlesssteelstaplesandsilksuturesforprimaryclosureofskininpatientsundergoingneckdissectionacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT vaibhavnagaraj comparisonbetweenstainlesssteelstaplesandsilksuturesforprimaryclosureofskininpatientsundergoingneckdissectionacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT gcrajkumar comparisonbetweenstainlesssteelstaplesandsilksuturesforprimaryclosureofskininpatientsundergoingneckdissectionacomparativeclinicalstudy
_version_ 1725529279311118336