A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography

This paper reviews data collection practices in electromagnetic articulography (EMA) studies, with a focus on sensor placement. We first introduce electromagnetic articulography as a method. We then focus on existing data collection practices. Our overview is based on a literature review of 905 publ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teja Rebernik, Jidde Jacobi, Roel Jonkers, Aude Noiray, Martijn Wieling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2021-03-01
Series:Laboratory Phonology
Subjects:
ema
Online Access:https://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/237
id doaj-db65211c486b4126b9da6080bf58bcdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db65211c486b4126b9da6080bf58bcdf2021-10-02T18:46:18ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesLaboratory Phonology1868-63542021-03-0112110.5334/labphon.237125A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulographyTeja Rebernik0Jidde Jacobi1Roel Jonkers2Aude Noiray3Martijn Wieling4Center for Language and Cognition, University of GroningenCenter for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen, NL; Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie UniversityCenter for Language and Cognition, University of GroningenLaboratory for Oral Language Acquisition, Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, DE; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CTCenter for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen, NL; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CTThis paper reviews data collection practices in electromagnetic articulography (EMA) studies, with a focus on sensor placement. We first introduce electromagnetic articulography as a method. We then focus on existing data collection practices. Our overview is based on a literature review of 905 publications from a large variety of journals and conferences, identified through a systematic keyword search in Google Scholar. The review shows that experimental designs vary greatly, which in turn may limit researchers’ ability to compare results across studies. Finally, we describe an EMA data collection procedure that includes an articulatory-driven strategy for determining where to position sensors on the tongue without causing discomfort to the participant. We also evaluate three approaches for preparing (NDI Wave) EMA sensors reported in the literature with respect to the duration the sensors remain attached to the tongue: 1) attaching out-of-the-box sensors, 2) attaching sensors coated in latex, and 3) attaching sensors coated in latex with an additional latex flap. Results indicate no clear general effect of sensor preparation type on adhesion duration. A subsequent exploratory analysis reveals that sensors with the additional flap tend to adhere for shorter times than the other two types, but that this pattern is inverted for the most posterior tongue sensor.https://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/237electromagnetic articulographyarticulationspeech kinematicsemandi wave
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teja Rebernik
Jidde Jacobi
Roel Jonkers
Aude Noiray
Martijn Wieling
spellingShingle Teja Rebernik
Jidde Jacobi
Roel Jonkers
Aude Noiray
Martijn Wieling
A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
Laboratory Phonology
electromagnetic articulography
articulation
speech kinematics
ema
ndi wave
author_facet Teja Rebernik
Jidde Jacobi
Roel Jonkers
Aude Noiray
Martijn Wieling
author_sort Teja Rebernik
title A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
title_short A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
title_full A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
title_fullStr A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
title_full_unstemmed A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
title_sort review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Laboratory Phonology
issn 1868-6354
publishDate 2021-03-01
description This paper reviews data collection practices in electromagnetic articulography (EMA) studies, with a focus on sensor placement. We first introduce electromagnetic articulography as a method. We then focus on existing data collection practices. Our overview is based on a literature review of 905 publications from a large variety of journals and conferences, identified through a systematic keyword search in Google Scholar. The review shows that experimental designs vary greatly, which in turn may limit researchers’ ability to compare results across studies. Finally, we describe an EMA data collection procedure that includes an articulatory-driven strategy for determining where to position sensors on the tongue without causing discomfort to the participant. We also evaluate three approaches for preparing (NDI Wave) EMA sensors reported in the literature with respect to the duration the sensors remain attached to the tongue: 1) attaching out-of-the-box sensors, 2) attaching sensors coated in latex, and 3) attaching sensors coated in latex with an additional latex flap. Results indicate no clear general effect of sensor preparation type on adhesion duration. A subsequent exploratory analysis reveals that sensors with the additional flap tend to adhere for shorter times than the other two types, but that this pattern is inverted for the most posterior tongue sensor.
topic electromagnetic articulography
articulation
speech kinematics
ema
ndi wave
url https://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/237
work_keys_str_mv AT tejarebernik areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT jiddejacobi areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT roeljonkers areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT audenoiray areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT martijnwieling areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT tejarebernik reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT jiddejacobi reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT roeljonkers reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT audenoiray reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
AT martijnwieling reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography
_version_ 1716848833400406016