A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography
This paper reviews data collection practices in electromagnetic articulography (EMA) studies, with a focus on sensor placement. We first introduce electromagnetic articulography as a method. We then focus on existing data collection practices. Our overview is based on a literature review of 905 publ...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Laboratory Phonology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/237 |
id |
doaj-db65211c486b4126b9da6080bf58bcdf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-db65211c486b4126b9da6080bf58bcdf2021-10-02T18:46:18ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesLaboratory Phonology1868-63542021-03-0112110.5334/labphon.237125A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulographyTeja Rebernik0Jidde Jacobi1Roel Jonkers2Aude Noiray3Martijn Wieling4Center for Language and Cognition, University of GroningenCenter for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen, NL; Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie UniversityCenter for Language and Cognition, University of GroningenLaboratory for Oral Language Acquisition, Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, DE; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CTCenter for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen, NL; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CTThis paper reviews data collection practices in electromagnetic articulography (EMA) studies, with a focus on sensor placement. We first introduce electromagnetic articulography as a method. We then focus on existing data collection practices. Our overview is based on a literature review of 905 publications from a large variety of journals and conferences, identified through a systematic keyword search in Google Scholar. The review shows that experimental designs vary greatly, which in turn may limit researchers’ ability to compare results across studies. Finally, we describe an EMA data collection procedure that includes an articulatory-driven strategy for determining where to position sensors on the tongue without causing discomfort to the participant. We also evaluate three approaches for preparing (NDI Wave) EMA sensors reported in the literature with respect to the duration the sensors remain attached to the tongue: 1) attaching out-of-the-box sensors, 2) attaching sensors coated in latex, and 3) attaching sensors coated in latex with an additional latex flap. Results indicate no clear general effect of sensor preparation type on adhesion duration. A subsequent exploratory analysis reveals that sensors with the additional flap tend to adhere for shorter times than the other two types, but that this pattern is inverted for the most posterior tongue sensor.https://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/237electromagnetic articulographyarticulationspeech kinematicsemandi wave |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Teja Rebernik Jidde Jacobi Roel Jonkers Aude Noiray Martijn Wieling |
spellingShingle |
Teja Rebernik Jidde Jacobi Roel Jonkers Aude Noiray Martijn Wieling A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography Laboratory Phonology electromagnetic articulography articulation speech kinematics ema ndi wave |
author_facet |
Teja Rebernik Jidde Jacobi Roel Jonkers Aude Noiray Martijn Wieling |
author_sort |
Teja Rebernik |
title |
A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography |
title_short |
A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography |
title_full |
A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography |
title_fullStr |
A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography |
title_full_unstemmed |
A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography |
title_sort |
review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Laboratory Phonology |
issn |
1868-6354 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
This paper reviews data collection practices in electromagnetic articulography (EMA) studies, with a focus on sensor placement. We first introduce electromagnetic articulography as a method. We then focus on existing data collection practices. Our overview is based on a literature review of 905 publications from a large variety of journals and conferences, identified through a systematic keyword search in Google Scholar. The review shows that experimental designs vary greatly, which in turn may limit researchers’ ability to compare results across studies. Finally, we describe an EMA data collection procedure that includes an articulatory-driven strategy for determining where to position sensors on the tongue without causing discomfort to the participant. We also evaluate three approaches for preparing (NDI Wave) EMA sensors reported in the literature with respect to the duration the sensors remain attached to the tongue: 1) attaching out-of-the-box sensors, 2) attaching sensors coated in latex, and 3) attaching sensors coated in latex with an additional latex flap. Results indicate no clear general effect of sensor preparation type on adhesion duration. A subsequent exploratory analysis reveals that sensors with the additional flap tend to adhere for shorter times than the other two types, but that this pattern is inverted for the most posterior tongue sensor. |
topic |
electromagnetic articulography articulation speech kinematics ema ndi wave |
url |
https://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/237 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tejarebernik areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT jiddejacobi areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT roeljonkers areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT audenoiray areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT martijnwieling areviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT tejarebernik reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT jiddejacobi reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT roeljonkers reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT audenoiray reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography AT martijnwieling reviewofdatacollectionpracticesusingelectromagneticarticulography |
_version_ |
1716848833400406016 |