Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method

Human error is one of the most important risk factors affecting aviation safety. The original Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) developed for the nuclear industry is reliable for human reliability quantification, but it is not fully applicable to human reliability analysis in a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yundong Guo, Youchao Sun, Xiufang Yang, Zongpeng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2812173
id doaj-db4d4d828a954dc097f36de90a0a79fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db4d4d828a954dc097f36de90a0a79fe2020-11-25T02:04:08ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering1687-59661687-59742019-01-01201910.1155/2019/28121732812173Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification MethodYundong Guo0Youchao Sun1Xiufang Yang2Zongpeng Wang3College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaCollege of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaCollege of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaCollege of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaHuman error is one of the most important risk factors affecting aviation safety. The original Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) developed for the nuclear industry is reliable for human reliability quantification, but it is not fully applicable to human reliability analysis in aviation because it neglects the characteristics of long-duration flights. Here, we propose a modified CREAM method to predict human error probability in flight and provide some improvement measures for critical operations. A set of performance influencing factors (PIFs), such as flight procedures and ground support, is established to reflect operational scenarios in flight. Then, we develop the expected affect index of PIFs and the Scenario Influence Index to construct a quantitative model of human reliability. The probability of human error for each operation in the approach and landing phases is obtained with the modified CREAM method, and the results indicate that the most important cognitive function that influences human reliability is missed action. The proposed method may be a suitable tool for human reliability quantification in aviation considering long-duration flights. The method also has great practical significance for improving flight safety.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2812173
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yundong Guo
Youchao Sun
Xiufang Yang
Zongpeng Wang
spellingShingle Yundong Guo
Youchao Sun
Xiufang Yang
Zongpeng Wang
Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
author_facet Yundong Guo
Youchao Sun
Xiufang Yang
Zongpeng Wang
author_sort Yundong Guo
title Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method
title_short Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method
title_full Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method
title_fullStr Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method
title_full_unstemmed Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method
title_sort flight safety assessment based on a modified human reliability quantification method
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
issn 1687-5966
1687-5974
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Human error is one of the most important risk factors affecting aviation safety. The original Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) developed for the nuclear industry is reliable for human reliability quantification, but it is not fully applicable to human reliability analysis in aviation because it neglects the characteristics of long-duration flights. Here, we propose a modified CREAM method to predict human error probability in flight and provide some improvement measures for critical operations. A set of performance influencing factors (PIFs), such as flight procedures and ground support, is established to reflect operational scenarios in flight. Then, we develop the expected affect index of PIFs and the Scenario Influence Index to construct a quantitative model of human reliability. The probability of human error for each operation in the approach and landing phases is obtained with the modified CREAM method, and the results indicate that the most important cognitive function that influences human reliability is missed action. The proposed method may be a suitable tool for human reliability quantification in aviation considering long-duration flights. The method also has great practical significance for improving flight safety.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2812173
work_keys_str_mv AT yundongguo flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod
AT youchaosun flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod
AT xiufangyang flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod
AT zongpengwang flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod
_version_ 1724944460433850368