Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method
Human error is one of the most important risk factors affecting aviation safety. The original Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) developed for the nuclear industry is reliable for human reliability quantification, but it is not fully applicable to human reliability analysis in a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2019-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Aerospace Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2812173 |
id |
doaj-db4d4d828a954dc097f36de90a0a79fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-db4d4d828a954dc097f36de90a0a79fe2020-11-25T02:04:08ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering1687-59661687-59742019-01-01201910.1155/2019/28121732812173Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification MethodYundong Guo0Youchao Sun1Xiufang Yang2Zongpeng Wang3College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaCollege of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaCollege of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaCollege of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, ChinaHuman error is one of the most important risk factors affecting aviation safety. The original Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) developed for the nuclear industry is reliable for human reliability quantification, but it is not fully applicable to human reliability analysis in aviation because it neglects the characteristics of long-duration flights. Here, we propose a modified CREAM method to predict human error probability in flight and provide some improvement measures for critical operations. A set of performance influencing factors (PIFs), such as flight procedures and ground support, is established to reflect operational scenarios in flight. Then, we develop the expected affect index of PIFs and the Scenario Influence Index to construct a quantitative model of human reliability. The probability of human error for each operation in the approach and landing phases is obtained with the modified CREAM method, and the results indicate that the most important cognitive function that influences human reliability is missed action. The proposed method may be a suitable tool for human reliability quantification in aviation considering long-duration flights. The method also has great practical significance for improving flight safety.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2812173 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yundong Guo Youchao Sun Xiufang Yang Zongpeng Wang |
spellingShingle |
Yundong Guo Youchao Sun Xiufang Yang Zongpeng Wang Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method International Journal of Aerospace Engineering |
author_facet |
Yundong Guo Youchao Sun Xiufang Yang Zongpeng Wang |
author_sort |
Yundong Guo |
title |
Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method |
title_short |
Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method |
title_full |
Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method |
title_fullStr |
Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Flight Safety Assessment Based on a Modified Human Reliability Quantification Method |
title_sort |
flight safety assessment based on a modified human reliability quantification method |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering |
issn |
1687-5966 1687-5974 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Human error is one of the most important risk factors affecting aviation safety. The original Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) developed for the nuclear industry is reliable for human reliability quantification, but it is not fully applicable to human reliability analysis in aviation because it neglects the characteristics of long-duration flights. Here, we propose a modified CREAM method to predict human error probability in flight and provide some improvement measures for critical operations. A set of performance influencing factors (PIFs), such as flight procedures and ground support, is established to reflect operational scenarios in flight. Then, we develop the expected affect index of PIFs and the Scenario Influence Index to construct a quantitative model of human reliability. The probability of human error for each operation in the approach and landing phases is obtained with the modified CREAM method, and the results indicate that the most important cognitive function that influences human reliability is missed action. The proposed method may be a suitable tool for human reliability quantification in aviation considering long-duration flights. The method also has great practical significance for improving flight safety. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2812173 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yundongguo flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod AT youchaosun flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod AT xiufangyang flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod AT zongpengwang flightsafetyassessmentbasedonamodifiedhumanreliabilityquantificationmethod |
_version_ |
1724944460433850368 |