Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter?
Abstract Introduction The aim of this exploratory study was to assess the EEG correlates of head positions (which have never been studied in humans) in participants with different psychophysiological characteristics, as encoded by their hypnotizability scores. This choice is motivated by earlier stu...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Brain and Behavior |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1277 |
id |
doaj-db3c00ce102447a089f88757361c316e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-db3c00ce102447a089f88757361c316e2020-11-25T03:31:56ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792019-06-0196n/an/a10.1002/brb3.1277Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter?Esther Ibáñez‐Marcelo0Lisa Campioni1Diego Manzoni2Enrica L. Santarcangelo3Giovanni Petri4ISI Foundation Turin ItalyDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery University of Pisa Pisa ItalyDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery University of Pisa Pisa ItalyDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery University of Pisa Pisa ItalyISI Foundation Turin ItalyAbstract Introduction The aim of this exploratory study was to assess the EEG correlates of head positions (which have never been studied in humans) in participants with different psychophysiological characteristics, as encoded by their hypnotizability scores. This choice is motivated by earlier studies suggesting different processing of vestibular/neck proprioceptive information in subjects with high (highs) and low (lows) hypnotizability scores maintaining their head rotated toward one side (RH). Methods We analyzed EEG signals recorded in 20 highs and 19 lows in basal conditions (head forward) and during RH using spectral analysis, which captures changes localized to specific recording sites, and topological data analysis (TDA), which instead describes large‐scale differences in processing and representing sensorimotor information. Results Spectral analysis revealed significant differences related to head position for alpha 1, beta 2, beta 3, and gamma bands, but not to hypnotizability. TDA instead revealed global hypnotizability‐related differences in the strengths of the correlations among recording sites during RH. Significant changes were observed in lows on the left parieto‐occipital side and in highs in right frontoparietal region. Significant differences between the two groups were found in the occipital region, where changes were larger in lows than in highs. Conclusions This study reports finding of the EEG correlates of changes in the head posture for the first time, indicating that hypnotizability is related to the head posture representation/processing on large‐scale networks and that spectral and topological data analyses provide complementary results.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1277EEGhead positionhypnotizabilityperceptionpersistent homologyspectral analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Esther Ibáñez‐Marcelo Lisa Campioni Diego Manzoni Enrica L. Santarcangelo Giovanni Petri |
spellingShingle |
Esther Ibáñez‐Marcelo Lisa Campioni Diego Manzoni Enrica L. Santarcangelo Giovanni Petri Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter? Brain and Behavior EEG head position hypnotizability perception persistent homology spectral analysis |
author_facet |
Esther Ibáñez‐Marcelo Lisa Campioni Diego Manzoni Enrica L. Santarcangelo Giovanni Petri |
author_sort |
Esther Ibáñez‐Marcelo |
title |
Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter? |
title_short |
Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter? |
title_full |
Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter? |
title_fullStr |
Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter? |
title_sort |
spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: does hypnotizability matter? |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Brain and Behavior |
issn |
2162-3279 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Introduction The aim of this exploratory study was to assess the EEG correlates of head positions (which have never been studied in humans) in participants with different psychophysiological characteristics, as encoded by their hypnotizability scores. This choice is motivated by earlier studies suggesting different processing of vestibular/neck proprioceptive information in subjects with high (highs) and low (lows) hypnotizability scores maintaining their head rotated toward one side (RH). Methods We analyzed EEG signals recorded in 20 highs and 19 lows in basal conditions (head forward) and during RH using spectral analysis, which captures changes localized to specific recording sites, and topological data analysis (TDA), which instead describes large‐scale differences in processing and representing sensorimotor information. Results Spectral analysis revealed significant differences related to head position for alpha 1, beta 2, beta 3, and gamma bands, but not to hypnotizability. TDA instead revealed global hypnotizability‐related differences in the strengths of the correlations among recording sites during RH. Significant changes were observed in lows on the left parieto‐occipital side and in highs in right frontoparietal region. Significant differences between the two groups were found in the occipital region, where changes were larger in lows than in highs. Conclusions This study reports finding of the EEG correlates of changes in the head posture for the first time, indicating that hypnotizability is related to the head posture representation/processing on large‐scale networks and that spectral and topological data analyses provide complementary results. |
topic |
EEG head position hypnotizability perception persistent homology spectral analysis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1277 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT estheribanezmarcelo spectralandtopologicalanalysesofthecorticalrepresentationoftheheadpositiondoeshypnotizabilitymatter AT lisacampioni spectralandtopologicalanalysesofthecorticalrepresentationoftheheadpositiondoeshypnotizabilitymatter AT diegomanzoni spectralandtopologicalanalysesofthecorticalrepresentationoftheheadpositiondoeshypnotizabilitymatter AT enricalsantarcangelo spectralandtopologicalanalysesofthecorticalrepresentationoftheheadpositiondoeshypnotizabilitymatter AT giovannipetri spectralandtopologicalanalysesofthecorticalrepresentationoftheheadpositiondoeshypnotizabilitymatter |
_version_ |
1724570705610145792 |