EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

<em>The data on effectiveness of editing in medical journals is restricted. <strong>Objective:</strong> to study an effectiveness of editing in improvement of manuscripts quality containing results of original study, which were published in the journal «Current Pediatrics» (Russia)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: R.T. Saygitov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC 2010-01-01
Series:Voprosy Sovremennoj Pediatrii
Online Access:http://vsp.spr-journal.ru:80/jour/article/view/967
id doaj-db3902fc9fc04e5e8c1a075b98c21289
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db3902fc9fc04e5e8c1a075b98c212892020-11-24T23:02:34Zeng"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC Voprosy Sovremennoj Pediatrii1682-55271682-55352010-01-0196515968EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDYR.T. Saygitov0Scientific Center of Children’s Health, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow<em>The data on effectiveness of editing in medical journals is restricted. <strong>Objective:</strong> to study an effectiveness of editing in improvement of manuscripts quality containing results of original study, which were published in the journal «Current Pediatrics» (Russia). <strong>Design:</strong> single blinded randomized controlled study in parallel groups. Consecutive eligible papers were sent to reviewers (n=137) who were randomised into 2 groups (1:1) for evaluation of five author’s or edited (accepted for publication) manuscripts. <strong>Main outcome measures:</strong> item of importance, originality, methods, data presentation, discussions and conclusion quality score were evaluated. <strong>Results:</strong> 102 (74%) participants gave at least one conclusion, 64 (47%) performed an estimation of all presented materials. 412 conclusions (208 on author’s manuscripts and 204 on edited ones) were analyzed. An analysis showed equal estimation of importance, methods, discussions and conclusions in both author’s and edited manuscripts. Evaluation of data presentation quality was higher in edited materials: odds ratio (OR) for estimation ≥ 3 according 5-point scale was 4.1 (95% CI 2.0–8.4) times higher than in author’s manuscripts. Higher estimation of editing effectiveness was received from «strict» readers (mean estimations of manuscripts quality in lower quartile). They mentioned that editing improves quality of data presentation — for estimation ≥ 3 according to 5-point scale OR was 7.8 (95% CI 2.9–20.6), conclusions — OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.0–5.2), methods — OR 2.2 (0.9–5.3; p = 0.068), and makes common impression of edited manuscripts better as well. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> editing improves quality of data presentation and description of conclusions and methods («strict» readers only) in manuscripts of original study.</em><br /><strong><em>Key words: reviewing, editing, original articles, quality.</em></strong><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>(<em><em><em>Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — </em></em></em>Current Pediatrics. 2010;9(6):<em>5-15</em>)</em></span>http://vsp.spr-journal.ru:80/jour/article/view/967
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R.T. Saygitov
spellingShingle R.T. Saygitov
EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
Voprosy Sovremennoj Pediatrii
author_facet R.T. Saygitov
author_sort R.T. Saygitov
title EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
title_short EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
title_full EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
title_fullStr EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
title_full_unstemmed EFFECTIVENESS OF EDITING IN PREPARATION OF ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
title_sort effectiveness of editing in preparation of original articles: results of randomized controlled study
publisher "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC
series Voprosy Sovremennoj Pediatrii
issn 1682-5527
1682-5535
publishDate 2010-01-01
description <em>The data on effectiveness of editing in medical journals is restricted. <strong>Objective:</strong> to study an effectiveness of editing in improvement of manuscripts quality containing results of original study, which were published in the journal «Current Pediatrics» (Russia). <strong>Design:</strong> single blinded randomized controlled study in parallel groups. Consecutive eligible papers were sent to reviewers (n=137) who were randomised into 2 groups (1:1) for evaluation of five author’s or edited (accepted for publication) manuscripts. <strong>Main outcome measures:</strong> item of importance, originality, methods, data presentation, discussions and conclusion quality score were evaluated. <strong>Results:</strong> 102 (74%) participants gave at least one conclusion, 64 (47%) performed an estimation of all presented materials. 412 conclusions (208 on author’s manuscripts and 204 on edited ones) were analyzed. An analysis showed equal estimation of importance, methods, discussions and conclusions in both author’s and edited manuscripts. Evaluation of data presentation quality was higher in edited materials: odds ratio (OR) for estimation ≥ 3 according 5-point scale was 4.1 (95% CI 2.0–8.4) times higher than in author’s manuscripts. Higher estimation of editing effectiveness was received from «strict» readers (mean estimations of manuscripts quality in lower quartile). They mentioned that editing improves quality of data presentation — for estimation ≥ 3 according to 5-point scale OR was 7.8 (95% CI 2.9–20.6), conclusions — OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.0–5.2), methods — OR 2.2 (0.9–5.3; p = 0.068), and makes common impression of edited manuscripts better as well. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> editing improves quality of data presentation and description of conclusions and methods («strict» readers only) in manuscripts of original study.</em><br /><strong><em>Key words: reviewing, editing, original articles, quality.</em></strong><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>(<em><em><em>Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — </em></em></em>Current Pediatrics. 2010;9(6):<em>5-15</em>)</em></span>
url http://vsp.spr-journal.ru:80/jour/article/view/967
work_keys_str_mv AT rtsaygitov effectivenessofeditinginpreparationoforiginalarticlesresultsofrandomizedcontrolledstudy
_version_ 1725636214047899648