Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of Knowledge
Actual efforts to use Michel FOUCAULT's ideas about discourse for empirical research induce a linguistic bias which misses FOUCAULT's interests in power/knowledge. Against such tendencies, this article argues for a grounding of discourse theory and empirical discourse research in the socio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FQS
2007-05-01
|
Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/243 |
id |
doaj-db217cecdac946e2a66df9a04592fe25 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-db217cecdac946e2a66df9a04592fe252020-11-24T23:23:22ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272007-05-0182242Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of KnowledgeReiner Keller0Universität AugsburgActual efforts to use Michel FOUCAULT's ideas about discourse for empirical research induce a linguistic bias which misses FOUCAULT's interests in power/knowledge. Against such tendencies, this article argues for a grounding of discourse theory and empirical discourse research in the sociology of knowledge, especially in the German-based Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie, which follows the BERGER/LUCKMANN approach to knowledge. For the purposes of empirical discourse research on knowledge, the author first considers the interpretative dimension of research. Then, some conceptual tools for knowledge analysis are presented (interpretative scheme, classification, phenomenal structure, narrative structure). Third, drawing on grounded theory and sequential analysis, concrete work on texts is discussed. Finally, the article insists that discourse research should not be reduced to the analysis of spoken or written texts. Instead, different kinds of materiality—for example as dispositifs—have to be considered. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702198http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/243Foucaultpower/knowledgesociology of knowledgediscourseinterpretationtextgrounded theorysequential analysisinterpretative schemedispositif |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Reiner Keller |
spellingShingle |
Reiner Keller Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of Knowledge Forum: Qualitative Social Research Foucault power/knowledge sociology of knowledge discourse interpretation text grounded theory sequential analysis interpretative scheme dispositif |
author_facet |
Reiner Keller |
author_sort |
Reiner Keller |
title |
Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of Knowledge |
title_short |
Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of Knowledge |
title_full |
Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of Knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of Knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysing Discourses and Dispositifs. Profiling Discourse Research in the Tradition of Sociology of Knowledge |
title_sort |
analysing discourses and dispositifs. profiling discourse research in the tradition of sociology of knowledge |
publisher |
FQS |
series |
Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
issn |
1438-5627 |
publishDate |
2007-05-01 |
description |
Actual efforts to use Michel FOUCAULT's ideas about discourse for empirical research induce a linguistic bias which misses FOUCAULT's interests in power/knowledge. Against such tendencies, this article argues for a grounding of discourse theory and empirical discourse research in the sociology of knowledge, especially in the German-based Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie, which follows the BERGER/LUCKMANN approach to knowledge. For the purposes of empirical discourse research on knowledge, the author first considers the interpretative dimension of research. Then, some conceptual tools for knowledge analysis are presented (interpretative scheme, classification, phenomenal structure, narrative structure). Third, drawing on grounded theory and sequential analysis, concrete work on texts is discussed. Finally, the article insists that discourse research should not be reduced to the analysis of spoken or written texts. Instead, different kinds of materiality—for example as dispositifs—have to be considered. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702198 |
topic |
Foucault power/knowledge sociology of knowledge discourse interpretation text grounded theory sequential analysis interpretative scheme dispositif |
url |
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/243 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT reinerkeller analysingdiscoursesanddispositifsprofilingdiscourseresearchinthetraditionofsociologyofknowledge |
_version_ |
1725563817482518528 |