A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability

The multitude of existing methods for assessing the phenotypic stability of plants makes breeders be faced with the problem of choosing an appropriate variant. The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of analyzing the genotype x environment interaction and, on their basis, assess t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. F. Cheshkova, P. I. Stepochkin, A. F. Aleynikov, I. G. Grebennikova, V. I. Ponomarenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2020-05-01
Series:Vavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2594
id doaj-db0e1952a62845b4b90a34b0a2565d91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db0e1952a62845b4b90a34b0a2565d912021-09-11T08:41:22ZengInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesVavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii2500-04622500-32592020-05-0124326727510.18699/VJ20.6191051A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stabilityA. F. Cheshkova0P. I. Stepochkin1A. F. Aleynikov2I. G. Grebennikova3V. I. Ponomarenko4Siberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-BioTechnologies, Russian Academy of SciencesSiberian Research Institute of Plant Production and Breeding - Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesSiberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-BioTechnologies, Russian Academy of SciencesSiberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-BioTechnologies, Russian Academy of SciencesSiberian Research Institute of Plant Production and Breeding - Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe multitude of existing methods for assessing the phenotypic stability of plants makes breeders be faced with the problem of choosing an appropriate variant. The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of analyzing the genotype x environment interaction and, on their basis, assess the stability of the yield of 7 varieties of winter wheat. The article compares 17 stability statistics by applying them to data obtained from agrotechnical experiments carried in 2009-2011 for evaluating the grain yield of 7 varieties of winter common wheat of Siberian selection (Novosibirskaya 32, Novosibirskaya 40, Novosibirskaya 51, Novosibirskaya 3, Novosibirskaya 2, Obskaya winter, Omskaya 6). Analysis of variance revealed a significant (p < 0.001) genotype x environment interaction in the experiments, which indicates a different reaction of genotypes to changes in environmental conditions. Genotypes were ranked according to the level of stability. Based on the analysis of the rank correlation matrix, the stability statistics were categorized in five groups. Recommendations were made on which group of methods to use depending on the objectives of the study. In the case when the goal of breeding research is the selection of the most biologically stable varieties with the minimum variance across a range of environments, one should use the methods of the static concept. If it is necessary to choose a genotype with a predictable reaction to changes of environmental conditions, corresponding to the calculated level or forecast, the regression approach is the most appropriate. The stability statistics generally identified Novosibirskaya 32 as the most stable variety from a biological point of view. The regression approach showed that Novosibirskaya 3 was the genotype with the smallest deviation from mean yield in all environments, while methods accessing the contribution of each genotype to the genotype x environment interaction defined Novosibirskaya 51 as the most stable variety.https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2594phenotypic stabilitygenotype x environment interactionplant breedingstatistical methodswinter wheat
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. F. Cheshkova
P. I. Stepochkin
A. F. Aleynikov
I. G. Grebennikova
V. I. Ponomarenko
spellingShingle A. F. Cheshkova
P. I. Stepochkin
A. F. Aleynikov
I. G. Grebennikova
V. I. Ponomarenko
A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
Vavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii
phenotypic stability
genotype x environment interaction
plant breeding
statistical methods
winter wheat
author_facet A. F. Cheshkova
P. I. Stepochkin
A. F. Aleynikov
I. G. Grebennikova
V. I. Ponomarenko
author_sort A. F. Cheshkova
title A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_short A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_full A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_fullStr A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_sort comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
publisher Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Vavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii
issn 2500-0462
2500-3259
publishDate 2020-05-01
description The multitude of existing methods for assessing the phenotypic stability of plants makes breeders be faced with the problem of choosing an appropriate variant. The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of analyzing the genotype x environment interaction and, on their basis, assess the stability of the yield of 7 varieties of winter wheat. The article compares 17 stability statistics by applying them to data obtained from agrotechnical experiments carried in 2009-2011 for evaluating the grain yield of 7 varieties of winter common wheat of Siberian selection (Novosibirskaya 32, Novosibirskaya 40, Novosibirskaya 51, Novosibirskaya 3, Novosibirskaya 2, Obskaya winter, Omskaya 6). Analysis of variance revealed a significant (p < 0.001) genotype x environment interaction in the experiments, which indicates a different reaction of genotypes to changes in environmental conditions. Genotypes were ranked according to the level of stability. Based on the analysis of the rank correlation matrix, the stability statistics were categorized in five groups. Recommendations were made on which group of methods to use depending on the objectives of the study. In the case when the goal of breeding research is the selection of the most biologically stable varieties with the minimum variance across a range of environments, one should use the methods of the static concept. If it is necessary to choose a genotype with a predictable reaction to changes of environmental conditions, corresponding to the calculated level or forecast, the regression approach is the most appropriate. The stability statistics generally identified Novosibirskaya 32 as the most stable variety from a biological point of view. The regression approach showed that Novosibirskaya 3 was the genotype with the smallest deviation from mean yield in all environments, while methods accessing the contribution of each genotype to the genotype x environment interaction defined Novosibirskaya 51 as the most stable variety.
topic phenotypic stability
genotype x environment interaction
plant breeding
statistical methods
winter wheat
url https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2594
work_keys_str_mv AT afcheshkova acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT pistepochkin acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT afaleynikov acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT iggrebennikova acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT viponomarenko acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT afcheshkova comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT pistepochkin comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT afaleynikov comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT iggrebennikova comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT viponomarenko comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
_version_ 1717756440943263744