Craniospinal Anomalies and their Management

Background : To find out the frequency of various craniospinal anomalies and their management in Rawalpindi Methods: In this cross sectional study patients with congenital gross craniospinal anomalies, were included. All patients were assessed from head to toe for any other associated anomalies. ....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huma Mushtaq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2015-03-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/306
id doaj-db09f53fda604a0c9036f262582ac130
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db09f53fda604a0c9036f262582ac1302020-11-25T03:44:33ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702015-03-01191Craniospinal Anomalies and their ManagementHuma Mushtaq0Department of Pathology, Islamabad Medical & Dental College,, Islamabad; Background : To find out the frequency of various craniospinal anomalies and their management in Rawalpindi Methods: In this cross sectional study patients with congenital gross craniospinal anomalies, were included. All patients were assessed from head to toe for any other associated anomalies. . Patients with high neural tube defects, cases associated with other gross anomalies and children below 15 days of age were deferred for operation. Patients with craniospinal anomalies were advised for CT scan brain and Spinal X ray. In Hydrocephalus patient’s ventricular tap was performed and CSF was sent for routine examination before inserting ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. Patients who were expected to have adequate quality of life and with amenable neural tube defects were operated after proper investigations. Results: A total number of 160 cases of craniospinal anomalies were presented . Majority of the cases were males (57%). The most common anomaly observed was of hydrocephalus (66.25%) and second most common anomaly was of myelomeningocele (14.37%). There were 2 cases of anencephaly, which were managed conservatively because of their incompatibility with life. Majority of the cases of hydrocephalus were operated on priority basis to restrict their head size. Cases of hydrocephalus which presented in patients above 6 months of age and with enlarged 3rd ventricle underwent 3rd ventriculostomy while others underwent shunting procedure. Conclusion: Patients presenting with high neural tube defects and have systemic congenital defects should be treated by non-operative measures. Patients presenting with amenable neural tube defect and who are expected to have adequate quality of life should be given proper surgical treatment along with proper counseling. https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/306Craniospinal anomaliesHydrocephalusNeural tube defects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Huma Mushtaq
spellingShingle Huma Mushtaq
Craniospinal Anomalies and their Management
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Craniospinal anomalies
Hydrocephalus
Neural tube defects
author_facet Huma Mushtaq
author_sort Huma Mushtaq
title Craniospinal Anomalies and their Management
title_short Craniospinal Anomalies and their Management
title_full Craniospinal Anomalies and their Management
title_fullStr Craniospinal Anomalies and their Management
title_full_unstemmed Craniospinal Anomalies and their Management
title_sort craniospinal anomalies and their management
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Background : To find out the frequency of various craniospinal anomalies and their management in Rawalpindi Methods: In this cross sectional study patients with congenital gross craniospinal anomalies, were included. All patients were assessed from head to toe for any other associated anomalies. . Patients with high neural tube defects, cases associated with other gross anomalies and children below 15 days of age were deferred for operation. Patients with craniospinal anomalies were advised for CT scan brain and Spinal X ray. In Hydrocephalus patient’s ventricular tap was performed and CSF was sent for routine examination before inserting ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. Patients who were expected to have adequate quality of life and with amenable neural tube defects were operated after proper investigations. Results: A total number of 160 cases of craniospinal anomalies were presented . Majority of the cases were males (57%). The most common anomaly observed was of hydrocephalus (66.25%) and second most common anomaly was of myelomeningocele (14.37%). There were 2 cases of anencephaly, which were managed conservatively because of their incompatibility with life. Majority of the cases of hydrocephalus were operated on priority basis to restrict their head size. Cases of hydrocephalus which presented in patients above 6 months of age and with enlarged 3rd ventricle underwent 3rd ventriculostomy while others underwent shunting procedure. Conclusion: Patients presenting with high neural tube defects and have systemic congenital defects should be treated by non-operative measures. Patients presenting with amenable neural tube defect and who are expected to have adequate quality of life should be given proper surgical treatment along with proper counseling.
topic Craniospinal anomalies
Hydrocephalus
Neural tube defects
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/306
work_keys_str_mv AT humamushtaq craniospinalanomaliesandtheirmanagement
_version_ 1724514191334703104