ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV? A cautious attitude is justified
With the current lack of data a cautious attitude towards ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD in patients with a systemic ventricle is justified, as we don't know who is actually at risk of SCD, but we do know that we will subject our patients to complications and inappropriate thera...
Main Authors: | Barbara J.M. Mulder, Joris R. de Groot |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-05-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668521000549 |
Similar Items
-
Final comment on the debate article “ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV”
by: Barbara JM. Mulder, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
ICD implantation for primary prevention in adult patients with a systemic right ventricle – The case in favor of implanting
by: Mikael Dellborg, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Periprocedural Considerations During Implantation of ICD In A Patient With Dextrocardia
by: Farid Aliyev, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Devices in Heart Failure Patients—Who Benefits From ICD and CRT?
by: Alexander Breitenstein, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Aorto-Right Ventricular Tunnel: An Uncommon Problem with a Common Solution
by: Fotios Mitropoulos, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01)