Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience

Abstract Background The choice of aortic valve replacement needs to be decided in an interdisciplinary approach and together with the patients and their families regarding the need for re-operation and risks accompanying anticoagulation. We report long-term outcomes after different AVR options. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanna Schlein, Paul Simon, Gregor Wollenek, Eva Base, Günther Laufer, Daniel Zimpfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01636-2
id doaj-db007d182a6546b89c3f01d8fc8de0c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-db007d182a6546b89c3f01d8fc8de0c12021-09-12T11:43:31ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902021-09-0116111110.1186/s13019-021-01636-2Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experienceJohanna Schlein0Paul Simon1Gregor Wollenek2Eva Base3Günther Laufer4Daniel Zimpfer5University Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of ViennaUniversity Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of ViennaUniversity Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of ViennaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of ViennaUniversity Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of ViennaUniversity Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of ViennaAbstract Background The choice of aortic valve replacement needs to be decided in an interdisciplinary approach and together with the patients and their families regarding the need for re-operation and risks accompanying anticoagulation. We report long-term outcomes after different AVR options. Methods A chart review of patients aged < 18 years at time of surgery, who had undergone AVR from May 1985 until April 2020 was conducted. Contraindications for Ross procedure, which is performed since 1991 at the center were reviewed in the observed non-Ross AVR cohort. The study endpoints were compared between the mechanical AVR and the biological AVR cohort. Results From May 1985 to April 2020 fifty-five patients received sixty AVRs: 33 mechanical AVRs and 27 biological AVRs. In over half of the fifty-three AVRs performed after 1991 (58.5%; 31/53) a contraindication for Ross procedure was present. Early mortality was 5% (3/60). All early deaths occurred in patients aged < 1 year at time of surgery. Two late deaths occurred and survival was 94.5% ± 3.1% at 10 years and 86.4% ± 6.2% at 30 years. Freedom from aortic valve re-operation was higher (p < 0.001) in the mechanical AVR than in the biological AVR cohort with 95.2% ± 4.6% and 33.6% ± 13.4% freedom from re-operation at 10 years respectively. Conclusions Re-operation was less frequent in the mechanical AVR cohort than in the biological AVR cohort. For mechanical AVR, the risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events was considerable with a composite linearized event rate per valve-year of 3.2%.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01636-2Congenital aortic valve diseasePediatric aortic valve replacementPediatric mechanical aortic valve replacementPediatric homograft aortic valve replacementPediatric bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johanna Schlein
Paul Simon
Gregor Wollenek
Eva Base
Günther Laufer
Daniel Zimpfer
spellingShingle Johanna Schlein
Paul Simon
Gregor Wollenek
Eva Base
Günther Laufer
Daniel Zimpfer
Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Congenital aortic valve disease
Pediatric aortic valve replacement
Pediatric mechanical aortic valve replacement
Pediatric homograft aortic valve replacement
Pediatric bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement
author_facet Johanna Schlein
Paul Simon
Gregor Wollenek
Eva Base
Günther Laufer
Daniel Zimpfer
author_sort Johanna Schlein
title Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience
title_short Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience
title_full Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience
title_fullStr Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience
title_sort aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience
publisher BMC
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
issn 1749-8090
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background The choice of aortic valve replacement needs to be decided in an interdisciplinary approach and together with the patients and their families regarding the need for re-operation and risks accompanying anticoagulation. We report long-term outcomes after different AVR options. Methods A chart review of patients aged < 18 years at time of surgery, who had undergone AVR from May 1985 until April 2020 was conducted. Contraindications for Ross procedure, which is performed since 1991 at the center were reviewed in the observed non-Ross AVR cohort. The study endpoints were compared between the mechanical AVR and the biological AVR cohort. Results From May 1985 to April 2020 fifty-five patients received sixty AVRs: 33 mechanical AVRs and 27 biological AVRs. In over half of the fifty-three AVRs performed after 1991 (58.5%; 31/53) a contraindication for Ross procedure was present. Early mortality was 5% (3/60). All early deaths occurred in patients aged < 1 year at time of surgery. Two late deaths occurred and survival was 94.5% ± 3.1% at 10 years and 86.4% ± 6.2% at 30 years. Freedom from aortic valve re-operation was higher (p < 0.001) in the mechanical AVR than in the biological AVR cohort with 95.2% ± 4.6% and 33.6% ± 13.4% freedom from re-operation at 10 years respectively. Conclusions Re-operation was less frequent in the mechanical AVR cohort than in the biological AVR cohort. For mechanical AVR, the risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events was considerable with a composite linearized event rate per valve-year of 3.2%.
topic Congenital aortic valve disease
Pediatric aortic valve replacement
Pediatric mechanical aortic valve replacement
Pediatric homograft aortic valve replacement
Pediatric bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01636-2
work_keys_str_mv AT johannaschlein aorticvalvereplacementinpediatricpatients30yearssinglecenterexperience
AT paulsimon aorticvalvereplacementinpediatricpatients30yearssinglecenterexperience
AT gregorwollenek aorticvalvereplacementinpediatricpatients30yearssinglecenterexperience
AT evabase aorticvalvereplacementinpediatricpatients30yearssinglecenterexperience
AT guntherlaufer aorticvalvereplacementinpediatricpatients30yearssinglecenterexperience
AT danielzimpfer aorticvalvereplacementinpediatricpatients30yearssinglecenterexperience
_version_ 1717755528213430272