Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for Nanosatellites
Single-frame methods of determining the attitude of a nanosatellite are compared in this study. The methods selected for comparison are: Single Value Decomposition (SVD), q method, Quaternion ESTimator (QUEST), Fast Optimal Attitude Matrix (FOAM) − all solving optimally the Wahba’s problem, and the...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Polish Academy of Sciences
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Metrology and Measurement Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/mms.2017.24.issue-2/mms-2017-0023/mms-2017-0023.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-dae903caf9844dcc90f0d2e022bf0dd9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dae903caf9844dcc90f0d2e022bf0dd92020-11-25T03:11:14ZengPolish Academy of SciencesMetrology and Measurement Systems2300-19412017-06-0124231332410.1515/mms-2017-0023mms-2017-0023Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for NanosatellitesGuler Demet Cilden0Conguroglu Ece S.1Hajiyev Chingiz2Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 34469, Maslak, Istanbul, TurkeyIstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 34469, Maslak, Istanbul, TurkeyIstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 34469, Maslak, Istanbul, TurkeySingle-frame methods of determining the attitude of a nanosatellite are compared in this study. The methods selected for comparison are: Single Value Decomposition (SVD), q method, Quaternion ESTimator (QUEST), Fast Optimal Attitude Matrix (FOAM) − all solving optimally the Wahba’s problem, and the algebraic method using only two vector measurements. For proper comparison, two sensors are chosen for the vector observations on-board: magnetometer and Sun sensors. Covariance results obtained as a result of using those methods have a critical importance for a non-traditional attitude estimation approach; therefore, the variance calculations are also presented. The examined methods are compared with respect to their root mean square (RMS) error and variance results. Also, some recommendations are given.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/mms.2017.24.issue-2/mms-2017-0023/mms-2017-0023.xml?format=INTattitude determinationsingle-frame methodsalgebraic methodcovariance analysisvector observation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Guler Demet Cilden Conguroglu Ece S. Hajiyev Chingiz |
spellingShingle |
Guler Demet Cilden Conguroglu Ece S. Hajiyev Chingiz Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for Nanosatellites Metrology and Measurement Systems attitude determination single-frame methods algebraic method covariance analysis vector observation |
author_facet |
Guler Demet Cilden Conguroglu Ece S. Hajiyev Chingiz |
author_sort |
Guler Demet Cilden |
title |
Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for Nanosatellites |
title_short |
Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for Nanosatellites |
title_full |
Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for Nanosatellites |
title_fullStr |
Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for Nanosatellites |
title_full_unstemmed |
Single-Frame Attitude Determination Methods for Nanosatellites |
title_sort |
single-frame attitude determination methods for nanosatellites |
publisher |
Polish Academy of Sciences |
series |
Metrology and Measurement Systems |
issn |
2300-1941 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
Single-frame methods of determining the attitude of a nanosatellite are compared in this study. The methods selected for comparison are: Single Value Decomposition (SVD), q method, Quaternion ESTimator (QUEST), Fast Optimal Attitude Matrix (FOAM) − all solving optimally the Wahba’s problem, and the algebraic method using only two vector measurements. For proper comparison, two sensors are chosen for the vector observations on-board: magnetometer and Sun sensors. Covariance results obtained as a result of using those methods have a critical importance for a non-traditional attitude estimation approach; therefore, the variance calculations are also presented. The examined methods are compared with respect to their root mean square (RMS) error and variance results. Also, some recommendations are given. |
topic |
attitude determination single-frame methods algebraic method covariance analysis vector observation |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/mms.2017.24.issue-2/mms-2017-0023/mms-2017-0023.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gulerdemetcilden singleframeattitudedeterminationmethodsfornanosatellites AT conguroglueces singleframeattitudedeterminationmethodsfornanosatellites AT hajiyevchingiz singleframeattitudedeterminationmethodsfornanosatellites |
_version_ |
1724655171541139456 |