Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has been widely considered a key factor for innovative design. However, the utilization of AM has not been as high as expected, although the technology offers key innovative design capabilities, weight reduction, parts count and assembly consolidation as well as material...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsakiris Antonios, Salpistis Christos, Mihailidis Athanassios
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818803020
id doaj-dac940a973e94f768d1bd6ddb3f819a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dac940a973e94f768d1bd6ddb3f819a42021-02-02T08:07:33ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011880302010.1051/matecconf/201818803020matecconf_iceaf-v2018_03020Design Right Once for Additive ManufacturingTsakiris AntoniosSalpistis ChristosMihailidis AthanassiosAdditive Manufacturing (AM) has been widely considered a key factor for innovative design. However, the utilization of AM has not been as high as expected, although the technology offers key innovative design capabilities, weight reduction, parts count and assembly consolidation as well as material saving. This low utilization is attributed to the lack of AM understanding, mature CAE/CAM software tools addressing AM specific issues such as design support structure generation and removal, residual stresses, surface quality. In most cases, Design for AM (DfAM) is a crucial requisite for a “Design Right Once” approach. Such an approach is shown in the current study using three parts as example: an arthropod’s leg, a gearshift drum and an electric motor mounting frame. The implementation of geometrical conformal lattice structures and lattices with variable density are discussed. A structured design approach is presented and design dilemmas are solved in terms of a DfAM approach. Primary design optimizations are evaluated. Weight reduction is considered throughout the design and free form surfaces are being used. “Freedom to Design” principle is also portrayed and assembly parts consolidation occurs as a natural process of DfAM in comparison with previous design practices. It is concluded that, even from the primary design phase the design engineer can reveal his creativity because of the absence of constraints set by the traditional manufacturing technologies.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818803020
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tsakiris Antonios
Salpistis Christos
Mihailidis Athanassios
spellingShingle Tsakiris Antonios
Salpistis Christos
Mihailidis Athanassios
Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Tsakiris Antonios
Salpistis Christos
Mihailidis Athanassios
author_sort Tsakiris Antonios
title Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing
title_short Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing
title_full Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing
title_fullStr Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing
title_sort design right once for additive manufacturing
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Additive Manufacturing (AM) has been widely considered a key factor for innovative design. However, the utilization of AM has not been as high as expected, although the technology offers key innovative design capabilities, weight reduction, parts count and assembly consolidation as well as material saving. This low utilization is attributed to the lack of AM understanding, mature CAE/CAM software tools addressing AM specific issues such as design support structure generation and removal, residual stresses, surface quality. In most cases, Design for AM (DfAM) is a crucial requisite for a “Design Right Once” approach. Such an approach is shown in the current study using three parts as example: an arthropod’s leg, a gearshift drum and an electric motor mounting frame. The implementation of geometrical conformal lattice structures and lattices with variable density are discussed. A structured design approach is presented and design dilemmas are solved in terms of a DfAM approach. Primary design optimizations are evaluated. Weight reduction is considered throughout the design and free form surfaces are being used. “Freedom to Design” principle is also portrayed and assembly parts consolidation occurs as a natural process of DfAM in comparison with previous design practices. It is concluded that, even from the primary design phase the design engineer can reveal his creativity because of the absence of constraints set by the traditional manufacturing technologies.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818803020
work_keys_str_mv AT tsakirisantonios designrightonceforadditivemanufacturing
AT salpistischristos designrightonceforadditivemanufacturing
AT mihailidisathanassios designrightonceforadditivemanufacturing
_version_ 1724297851952955392