Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing (AM) has been widely considered a key factor for innovative design. However, the utilization of AM has not been as high as expected, although the technology offers key innovative design capabilities, weight reduction, parts count and assembly consolidation as well as material...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
Series: | MATEC Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818803020 |
id |
doaj-dac940a973e94f768d1bd6ddb3f819a4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dac940a973e94f768d1bd6ddb3f819a42021-02-02T08:07:33ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011880302010.1051/matecconf/201818803020matecconf_iceaf-v2018_03020Design Right Once for Additive ManufacturingTsakiris AntoniosSalpistis ChristosMihailidis AthanassiosAdditive Manufacturing (AM) has been widely considered a key factor for innovative design. However, the utilization of AM has not been as high as expected, although the technology offers key innovative design capabilities, weight reduction, parts count and assembly consolidation as well as material saving. This low utilization is attributed to the lack of AM understanding, mature CAE/CAM software tools addressing AM specific issues such as design support structure generation and removal, residual stresses, surface quality. In most cases, Design for AM (DfAM) is a crucial requisite for a “Design Right Once” approach. Such an approach is shown in the current study using three parts as example: an arthropod’s leg, a gearshift drum and an electric motor mounting frame. The implementation of geometrical conformal lattice structures and lattices with variable density are discussed. A structured design approach is presented and design dilemmas are solved in terms of a DfAM approach. Primary design optimizations are evaluated. Weight reduction is considered throughout the design and free form surfaces are being used. “Freedom to Design” principle is also portrayed and assembly parts consolidation occurs as a natural process of DfAM in comparison with previous design practices. It is concluded that, even from the primary design phase the design engineer can reveal his creativity because of the absence of constraints set by the traditional manufacturing technologies.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818803020 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tsakiris Antonios Salpistis Christos Mihailidis Athanassios |
spellingShingle |
Tsakiris Antonios Salpistis Christos Mihailidis Athanassios Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing MATEC Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Tsakiris Antonios Salpistis Christos Mihailidis Athanassios |
author_sort |
Tsakiris Antonios |
title |
Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing |
title_short |
Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing |
title_full |
Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing |
title_fullStr |
Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Design Right Once for Additive Manufacturing |
title_sort |
design right once for additive manufacturing |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-236X |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Additive Manufacturing (AM) has been widely considered a key factor for innovative design. However, the utilization of AM has not been as high as expected, although the technology offers key innovative design capabilities, weight reduction, parts count and assembly consolidation as well as material saving. This low utilization is attributed to the lack of AM understanding, mature CAE/CAM software tools addressing AM specific issues such as design support structure generation and removal, residual stresses, surface quality. In most cases, Design for AM (DfAM) is a crucial requisite for a “Design Right Once” approach. Such an approach is shown in the current study using three parts as example: an arthropod’s leg, a gearshift drum and an electric motor mounting frame. The implementation of geometrical conformal lattice structures and lattices with variable density are discussed. A structured design approach is presented and design dilemmas are solved in terms of a DfAM approach. Primary design optimizations are evaluated. Weight reduction is considered throughout the design and free form surfaces are being used. “Freedom to Design” principle is also portrayed and assembly parts consolidation occurs as a natural process of DfAM in comparison with previous design practices. It is concluded that, even from the primary design phase the design engineer can reveal his creativity because of the absence of constraints set by the traditional manufacturing technologies. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818803020 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tsakirisantonios designrightonceforadditivemanufacturing AT salpistischristos designrightonceforadditivemanufacturing AT mihailidisathanassios designrightonceforadditivemanufacturing |
_version_ |
1724297851952955392 |