Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain

Self-adjustment of hearing aid gain can provide valuable information about the gain preferences of individual listeners, but these preferences are not well understood. Listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss used self-adjustment to select amplification gain and compression parameters in real ti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trevor T. Perry, Peggy B. Nelson, Dianne J. Van Tasell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-03-01
Series:Trends in Hearing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519837124
id doaj-da9962b27a4b40fa8329bd7b7c51354f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da9962b27a4b40fa8329bd7b7c51354f2020-11-25T02:59:27ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652019-03-012310.1177/2331216519837124Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid GainTrevor T. Perry0Peggy B. Nelson1Dianne J. Van Tasell2Center for Applied and Translational Sensory Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USACenter for Applied and Translational Sensory Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USASelf-adjustment of hearing aid gain can provide valuable information about the gain preferences of individual listeners, but these preferences are not well understood. Listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss used self-adjustment to select amplification gain and compression parameters in real time on a portable touch screen device while listening in quiet and noisy backgrounds. Adjustments to gain prescribed by the National Acoustics Laboratories' non-linear fitting procedure (NAL-NL2) showed large between-subject variability. Known listener characteristics (age, gender, hearing thresholds, hearing aid experience, acceptable noise level, and external ear characteristics) and listener engagement with the self-adjustment software were examined as potential predictors of this variability. Neither listener characteristics nor time spent adjusting gain were robust predictors of gain change from NAL-NL2. Listeners with less than 2 years of hearing aid experience and who also had better hearing thresholds tended to select less gain, relative to NAL-NL2, than experienced hearing aid users who had poorer thresholds. Listener factors explained no more than 10% of the between-subject variance in deviation from NAL-NL2, suggesting that modifying prescriptive fitting formulae based on the factors examined here would be unlikely to result in amplification parameters that are similar to user-customized settings. Self-adjustment typically took less than 3 min, indicating that listeners could use comparable technology without a substantial time commitment.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519837124
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trevor T. Perry
Peggy B. Nelson
Dianne J. Van Tasell
spellingShingle Trevor T. Perry
Peggy B. Nelson
Dianne J. Van Tasell
Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain
Trends in Hearing
author_facet Trevor T. Perry
Peggy B. Nelson
Dianne J. Van Tasell
author_sort Trevor T. Perry
title Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain
title_short Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain
title_full Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain
title_fullStr Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain
title_full_unstemmed Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain
title_sort listener factors explain little variability in self-adjusted hearing aid gain
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Trends in Hearing
issn 2331-2165
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Self-adjustment of hearing aid gain can provide valuable information about the gain preferences of individual listeners, but these preferences are not well understood. Listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss used self-adjustment to select amplification gain and compression parameters in real time on a portable touch screen device while listening in quiet and noisy backgrounds. Adjustments to gain prescribed by the National Acoustics Laboratories' non-linear fitting procedure (NAL-NL2) showed large between-subject variability. Known listener characteristics (age, gender, hearing thresholds, hearing aid experience, acceptable noise level, and external ear characteristics) and listener engagement with the self-adjustment software were examined as potential predictors of this variability. Neither listener characteristics nor time spent adjusting gain were robust predictors of gain change from NAL-NL2. Listeners with less than 2 years of hearing aid experience and who also had better hearing thresholds tended to select less gain, relative to NAL-NL2, than experienced hearing aid users who had poorer thresholds. Listener factors explained no more than 10% of the between-subject variance in deviation from NAL-NL2, suggesting that modifying prescriptive fitting formulae based on the factors examined here would be unlikely to result in amplification parameters that are similar to user-customized settings. Self-adjustment typically took less than 3 min, indicating that listeners could use comparable technology without a substantial time commitment.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519837124
work_keys_str_mv AT trevortperry listenerfactorsexplainlittlevariabilityinselfadjustedhearingaidgain
AT peggybnelson listenerfactorsexplainlittlevariabilityinselfadjustedhearingaidgain
AT diannejvantasell listenerfactorsexplainlittlevariabilityinselfadjustedhearingaidgain
_version_ 1724702245821349888