How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering

We examined whether the temporal rate at which thought probes are presented affects the likelihood that people will report periods of mind wandering. To evaluate this possibility, we had participants complete a sustained-attention task (the Metronome Response Task; MRT) during which we intermittentl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul eSeli, Jonathan S. A. Carriere, Merrick eLevene, Dan eSmilek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
MRT
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00430/full
id doaj-da9444ef17ee45cd9c9d1ce6ec9250a7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da9444ef17ee45cd9c9d1ce6ec9250a72020-11-24T22:48:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-07-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0043057248How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wanderingPaul eSeli0Jonathan S. A. Carriere1Merrick eLevene2Dan eSmilek3University of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooWe examined whether the temporal rate at which thought probes are presented affects the likelihood that people will report periods of mind wandering. To evaluate this possibility, we had participants complete a sustained-attention task (the Metronome Response Task; MRT) during which we intermittently presented thought probes. Critically, we varied the average time between probes (i.e., probe rate) across participants, allowing us to examine the relation between probe rate and mind-wandering rate. We observed a positive relation between these variables, indicating that people are more likely to report mind wandering as the time between probes increases. We discuss the methodological implications of this finding in the context of the mind-wandering literature, and suggest that researchers include a range of probe rates in future work to provide more insight into this methodological issue.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00430/fullmind wanderingMRTThought probesThought samplingMetronome Response Task
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul eSeli
Jonathan S. A. Carriere
Merrick eLevene
Dan eSmilek
spellingShingle Paul eSeli
Jonathan S. A. Carriere
Merrick eLevene
Dan eSmilek
How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering
Frontiers in Psychology
mind wandering
MRT
Thought probes
Thought sampling
Metronome Response Task
author_facet Paul eSeli
Jonathan S. A. Carriere
Merrick eLevene
Dan eSmilek
author_sort Paul eSeli
title How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering
title_short How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering
title_full How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering
title_fullStr How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering
title_full_unstemmed How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering
title_sort how few and far between? examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2013-07-01
description We examined whether the temporal rate at which thought probes are presented affects the likelihood that people will report periods of mind wandering. To evaluate this possibility, we had participants complete a sustained-attention task (the Metronome Response Task; MRT) during which we intermittently presented thought probes. Critically, we varied the average time between probes (i.e., probe rate) across participants, allowing us to examine the relation between probe rate and mind-wandering rate. We observed a positive relation between these variables, indicating that people are more likely to report mind wandering as the time between probes increases. We discuss the methodological implications of this finding in the context of the mind-wandering literature, and suggest that researchers include a range of probe rates in future work to provide more insight into this methodological issue.
topic mind wandering
MRT
Thought probes
Thought sampling
Metronome Response Task
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00430/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pauleseli howfewandfarbetweenexaminingtheeffectsofproberateonselfreportedmindwandering
AT jonathansacarriere howfewandfarbetweenexaminingtheeffectsofproberateonselfreportedmindwandering
AT merrickelevene howfewandfarbetweenexaminingtheeffectsofproberateonselfreportedmindwandering
AT danesmilek howfewandfarbetweenexaminingtheeffectsofproberateonselfreportedmindwandering
_version_ 1725678791654637568