Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
As a result of a renewed regulatory framework introduced by the LCAP law, the publicising of movable archaeological properties and the strengthening of the scientific and technical control (Cst) of State services in terms of collection management raise the question of the specificity of the treatmen...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11500 |
id |
doaj-da9375e76ad14c42adf44a99c687795b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-da9375e76ad14c42adf44a99c687795b2021-07-08T17:04:27ZfraEditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'HommeLes Nouvelles de l’Archéologie0242-77022425-19412021-03-01162313510.4000/nda.11500Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologiqueOlivier LabatLaurent PelletierAs a result of a renewed regulatory framework introduced by the LCAP law, the publicising of movable archaeological properties and the strengthening of the scientific and technical control (Cst) of State services in terms of collection management raise the question of the specificity of the treatment of collections during the archaeological diagnosis phase. This article provides a brief history of both the institutional and methodological treatment of this question, before analysing the difference in status that artefact encounters according to its place in the heritage chain. Indeed, it can be seen that artefact from the initial phase of archaeological operations does not meet the same obligations as object, even though it comes from the same taphonomic context, which is uncovered during an excavation operation. However, from a purely regulatory point of view, movable archaeological properties are invariable cultural objects, whatever the administrative context of their discovery. This state of affairs inevitably questions the place of the conservator-restorer in the current operational mechanisms of preventive archaeology.http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11500diagnosisexcavationregulationsconservation-restorationtreatmentscientific control |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olivier Labat Laurent Pelletier |
spellingShingle |
Olivier Labat Laurent Pelletier Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie diagnosis excavation regulations conservation-restoration treatment scientific control |
author_facet |
Olivier Labat Laurent Pelletier |
author_sort |
Olivier Labat |
title |
Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique |
title_short |
Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique |
title_full |
Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique |
title_fullStr |
Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique |
title_full_unstemmed |
Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique |
title_sort |
les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique |
publisher |
Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme |
series |
Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie |
issn |
0242-7702 2425-1941 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
As a result of a renewed regulatory framework introduced by the LCAP law, the publicising of movable archaeological properties and the strengthening of the scientific and technical control (Cst) of State services in terms of collection management raise the question of the specificity of the treatment of collections during the archaeological diagnosis phase. This article provides a brief history of both the institutional and methodological treatment of this question, before analysing the difference in status that artefact encounters according to its place in the heritage chain. Indeed, it can be seen that artefact from the initial phase of archaeological operations does not meet the same obligations as object, even though it comes from the same taphonomic context, which is uncovered during an excavation operation. However, from a purely regulatory point of view, movable archaeological properties are invariable cultural objects, whatever the administrative context of their discovery. This state of affairs inevitably questions the place of the conservator-restorer in the current operational mechanisms of preventive archaeology. |
topic |
diagnosis excavation regulations conservation-restoration treatment scientific control |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11500 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olivierlabat lesbiensarcheologiquesmobiliersencontextedediagnosticarcheologique AT laurentpelletier lesbiensarcheologiquesmobiliersencontextedediagnosticarcheologique |
_version_ |
1721312587886362624 |