Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique

As a result of a renewed regulatory framework introduced by the LCAP law, the publicising of movable archaeological properties and the strengthening of the scientific and technical control (Cst) of State services in terms of collection management raise the question of the specificity of the treatmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivier Labat, Laurent Pelletier
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme 2021-03-01
Series:Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11500
id doaj-da9375e76ad14c42adf44a99c687795b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da9375e76ad14c42adf44a99c687795b2021-07-08T17:04:27ZfraEditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'HommeLes Nouvelles de l’Archéologie0242-77022425-19412021-03-01162313510.4000/nda.11500Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologiqueOlivier LabatLaurent PelletierAs a result of a renewed regulatory framework introduced by the LCAP law, the publicising of movable archaeological properties and the strengthening of the scientific and technical control (Cst) of State services in terms of collection management raise the question of the specificity of the treatment of collections during the archaeological diagnosis phase. This article provides a brief history of both the institutional and methodological treatment of this question, before analysing the difference in status that artefact encounters according to its place in the heritage chain. Indeed, it can be seen that artefact from the initial phase of archaeological operations does not meet the same obligations as object, even though it comes from the same taphonomic context, which is uncovered during an excavation operation. However, from a purely regulatory point of view, movable archaeological properties are invariable cultural objects, whatever the administrative context of their discovery. This state of affairs inevitably questions the place of the conservator-restorer in the current operational mechanisms of preventive archaeology.http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11500diagnosisexcavationregulationsconservation-restorationtreatmentscientific control
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivier Labat
Laurent Pelletier
spellingShingle Olivier Labat
Laurent Pelletier
Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
diagnosis
excavation
regulations
conservation-restoration
treatment
scientific control
author_facet Olivier Labat
Laurent Pelletier
author_sort Olivier Labat
title Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
title_short Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
title_full Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
title_fullStr Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
title_full_unstemmed Les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
title_sort les biens archéologiques mobiliers en contexte de diagnostic archéologique
publisher Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme
series Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
issn 0242-7702
2425-1941
publishDate 2021-03-01
description As a result of a renewed regulatory framework introduced by the LCAP law, the publicising of movable archaeological properties and the strengthening of the scientific and technical control (Cst) of State services in terms of collection management raise the question of the specificity of the treatment of collections during the archaeological diagnosis phase. This article provides a brief history of both the institutional and methodological treatment of this question, before analysing the difference in status that artefact encounters according to its place in the heritage chain. Indeed, it can be seen that artefact from the initial phase of archaeological operations does not meet the same obligations as object, even though it comes from the same taphonomic context, which is uncovered during an excavation operation. However, from a purely regulatory point of view, movable archaeological properties are invariable cultural objects, whatever the administrative context of their discovery. This state of affairs inevitably questions the place of the conservator-restorer in the current operational mechanisms of preventive archaeology.
topic diagnosis
excavation
regulations
conservation-restoration
treatment
scientific control
url http://journals.openedition.org/nda/11500
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierlabat lesbiensarcheologiquesmobiliersencontextedediagnosticarcheologique
AT laurentpelletier lesbiensarcheologiquesmobiliersencontextedediagnosticarcheologique
_version_ 1721312587886362624