3. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basel

The configuration of literary and theological interests of Erasmus’ modern readers have often obscured his and his 16th-century colleagues’ interests in natural philosophy, medicine, and mathematics. Yet the larger network of scholars who corresponded with Erasmus and took him as model included impo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard Oosterhoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Torino 2014-12-01
Series:Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas
Online Access:http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/jihi/article/view/814
id doaj-da71619aef784533a7a2c20b7f019a3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da71619aef784533a7a2c20b7f019a3a2020-11-25T03:04:11ZengUniversità degli Studi di TorinoJournal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas2280-85742014-12-013610.13135/2280-8574/8145873. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ BaselRichard Oosterhoff0Cambridge UniversityThe configuration of literary and theological interests of Erasmus’ modern readers have often obscured his and his 16th-century colleagues’ interests in natural philosophy, medicine, and mathematics. Yet the larger network of scholars who corresponded with Erasmus and took him as model included important representatives of the mathematical disciplines, both the quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy) and the adjacent studies of optics and cosmography. In this article, I suggest that mathematical scholars in Erasmus’ orbit shared certain priorities with Lefèvre d’Étaples; in this respect, ‘Erasmian mathematics’ might better be called ‘Fabrist’. I shall first present several works of mathematics published in Basle during the 1530s, when Erasmus still wielded considerable influence on Basle printing. Then I shall review the curious relationship of Basle’s humanists to Paris—Erasmus himself aggravated the growing distance between Basle and Paris—and compare the attitudes towards mathematics of the Fabrists, Simon Grynaeus, and Erasmus. Here lies a a methodological lesson that has not yet reshaped our own historical studies. Tempted by Erasmus’ own powerful account of erudition as mostly about non-technical knowledge, both historians of science and historians of literature have been encouraged to miss the place of mathematics in the liberal arts—and indeed in the shape of erudition—of that literary republic. Erasmus may have been complicit with the forces that gave us the “two cultures” divide.http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/jihi/article/view/814
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Oosterhoff
spellingShingle Richard Oosterhoff
3. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basel
Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas
author_facet Richard Oosterhoff
author_sort Richard Oosterhoff
title 3. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basel
title_short 3. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basel
title_full 3. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basel
title_fullStr 3. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basel
title_full_unstemmed 3. The Fabrist Origins of Erasmian Science: Mathematical Erudition in Erasmus’ Basel
title_sort 3. the fabrist origins of erasmian science: mathematical erudition in erasmus’ basel
publisher Università degli Studi di Torino
series Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas
issn 2280-8574
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The configuration of literary and theological interests of Erasmus’ modern readers have often obscured his and his 16th-century colleagues’ interests in natural philosophy, medicine, and mathematics. Yet the larger network of scholars who corresponded with Erasmus and took him as model included important representatives of the mathematical disciplines, both the quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy) and the adjacent studies of optics and cosmography. In this article, I suggest that mathematical scholars in Erasmus’ orbit shared certain priorities with Lefèvre d’Étaples; in this respect, ‘Erasmian mathematics’ might better be called ‘Fabrist’. I shall first present several works of mathematics published in Basle during the 1530s, when Erasmus still wielded considerable influence on Basle printing. Then I shall review the curious relationship of Basle’s humanists to Paris—Erasmus himself aggravated the growing distance between Basle and Paris—and compare the attitudes towards mathematics of the Fabrists, Simon Grynaeus, and Erasmus. Here lies a a methodological lesson that has not yet reshaped our own historical studies. Tempted by Erasmus’ own powerful account of erudition as mostly about non-technical knowledge, both historians of science and historians of literature have been encouraged to miss the place of mathematics in the liberal arts—and indeed in the shape of erudition—of that literary republic. Erasmus may have been complicit with the forces that gave us the “two cultures” divide.
url http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/jihi/article/view/814
work_keys_str_mv AT richardoosterhoff 3thefabristoriginsoferasmiansciencemathematicaleruditioninerasmusbasel
_version_ 1724682391890427904