Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and Challenges

Based on a comprehensive analysis of 39 studies published in academic journals in the past decade (2010–2020), this article discusses the strengths of current research and the challenges that lie ahead for researchers interested in conducting longitudinal research on music education and child develo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beatriz Ilari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-07-01
Series:Music & Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320937224
id doaj-da6a79e23d624be7898573d8a78e361c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da6a79e23d624be7898573d8a78e361c2020-11-25T03:04:02ZengSAGE PublishingMusic & Science2059-20432020-07-01310.1177/2059204320937224Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and ChallengesBeatriz IlariBased on a comprehensive analysis of 39 studies published in academic journals in the past decade (2010–2020), this article discusses the strengths of current research and the challenges that lie ahead for researchers interested in conducting longitudinal research on music education and child development. Among the strengths of the reviewed studies are multi-year projects, diverse study samples and programs, and a wide range of areas of interest—cognitive and neural to socioemotional and musical development. Challenges for future research are described in relation to three main perspectives. The methodological, the first perspective, tackles future challenges in terms of research approaches, population sampling, randomization, replication, and the lack of cross-cultural longitudinal research. The second perspective, the conceptual-philosophical, focuses on how children, music, and music education have been defined—in deliberate or tacit ways—in longitudinal works, and their implications for both research and practice. The third perspective, the political, focuses on the extent to which research on the effects of music education may be interpreted by some as promoting a neoliberal educational agenda. I conclude the article with suggestions for future research.https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320937224
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beatriz Ilari
spellingShingle Beatriz Ilari
Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and Challenges
Music & Science
author_facet Beatriz Ilari
author_sort Beatriz Ilari
title Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and Challenges
title_short Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and Challenges
title_full Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and Challenges
title_fullStr Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal Research on Music Education and Child Development: Contributions and Challenges
title_sort longitudinal research on music education and child development: contributions and challenges
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Music & Science
issn 2059-2043
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Based on a comprehensive analysis of 39 studies published in academic journals in the past decade (2010–2020), this article discusses the strengths of current research and the challenges that lie ahead for researchers interested in conducting longitudinal research on music education and child development. Among the strengths of the reviewed studies are multi-year projects, diverse study samples and programs, and a wide range of areas of interest—cognitive and neural to socioemotional and musical development. Challenges for future research are described in relation to three main perspectives. The methodological, the first perspective, tackles future challenges in terms of research approaches, population sampling, randomization, replication, and the lack of cross-cultural longitudinal research. The second perspective, the conceptual-philosophical, focuses on how children, music, and music education have been defined—in deliberate or tacit ways—in longitudinal works, and their implications for both research and practice. The third perspective, the political, focuses on the extent to which research on the effects of music education may be interpreted by some as promoting a neoliberal educational agenda. I conclude the article with suggestions for future research.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320937224
work_keys_str_mv AT beatrizilari longitudinalresearchonmusiceducationandchilddevelopmentcontributionsandchallenges
_version_ 1724683187337035776