3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs

The tetramorphth crystals of 4,4–dimethylbenzophenone (D) were obtained using slow-evaporation crystallization method and the structure is elucidated using single crystal X-ray diffraction technique. D crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system (space group Pbca) with cell parameters a = 14.698...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. Madan Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-02-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844018362984
id doaj-da3fdcfc1291477daa54ba386cdaa6bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da3fdcfc1291477daa54ba386cdaa6bb2020-11-25T02:04:56ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402019-02-0152e012093D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphsS. Madan Kumar0Corresponding author.; DST-PURSE Lab, Mangalore University, IndiaThe tetramorphth crystals of 4,4–dimethylbenzophenone (D) were obtained using slow-evaporation crystallization method and the structure is elucidated using single crystal X-ray diffraction technique. D crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system (space group Pbca) with cell parameters a = 14.6986 (11) Å, b = 6.1323 (4) Å, c = 26.2730 (18) Å, V = 2368.2 (3) Å3 and Z = 8. In the crystal structure, intermolecular interaction of the type C---H...π stabilizes the crystal packing. This polymorph is the fourth candidate of its kind and second candidate in the orthorhombic crystal system. The structural comparisons and crystal packing of tetramorphs (A, B, C and D) are analyzed using molecular structures, Hirshfeld surfaces, enrichment ratios (E) and energy frameworks. The conformational differences are observed in all the tetramorphs and the intercontacts H⋯H and C⋯H contributes around 85 % to the Hirshfeld surfaces. The E ratio provides evidence of H⋯H, C⋯H and O⋯H intercontacts having high propensity to form contacts in the crystal packing. The average energy (dimer formation) for each polymorph is calculated from energy framework analysis. The systematic comparison of crystal packing in tetramorphs through 3D-topology is visualized. In the energy-frameworks of the crystal packing, dispersion energy dominates over the electrostatic energy. Overall, the molecular packings of the four polymorphic structures are different.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844018362984Condensed matter physics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Madan Kumar
spellingShingle S. Madan Kumar
3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs
Heliyon
Condensed matter physics
author_facet S. Madan Kumar
author_sort S. Madan Kumar
title 3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs
title_short 3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs
title_full 3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs
title_fullStr 3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs
title_full_unstemmed 3D energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs
title_sort 3d energy frameworks of dimethylbenzophenone tetramorphs
publisher Elsevier
series Heliyon
issn 2405-8440
publishDate 2019-02-01
description The tetramorphth crystals of 4,4–dimethylbenzophenone (D) were obtained using slow-evaporation crystallization method and the structure is elucidated using single crystal X-ray diffraction technique. D crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system (space group Pbca) with cell parameters a = 14.6986 (11) Å, b = 6.1323 (4) Å, c = 26.2730 (18) Å, V = 2368.2 (3) Å3 and Z = 8. In the crystal structure, intermolecular interaction of the type C---H...π stabilizes the crystal packing. This polymorph is the fourth candidate of its kind and second candidate in the orthorhombic crystal system. The structural comparisons and crystal packing of tetramorphs (A, B, C and D) are analyzed using molecular structures, Hirshfeld surfaces, enrichment ratios (E) and energy frameworks. The conformational differences are observed in all the tetramorphs and the intercontacts H⋯H and C⋯H contributes around 85 % to the Hirshfeld surfaces. The E ratio provides evidence of H⋯H, C⋯H and O⋯H intercontacts having high propensity to form contacts in the crystal packing. The average energy (dimer formation) for each polymorph is calculated from energy framework analysis. The systematic comparison of crystal packing in tetramorphs through 3D-topology is visualized. In the energy-frameworks of the crystal packing, dispersion energy dominates over the electrostatic energy. Overall, the molecular packings of the four polymorphic structures are different.
topic Condensed matter physics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844018362984
work_keys_str_mv AT smadankumar 3denergyframeworksofdimethylbenzophenonetetramorphs
_version_ 1724940240532013056