Repenser l’héritage critique des revues

This paper starts from the ambivalent relation that links researchers and intellectual journals during the twentieth and the twenty-first centuries. After questioning the definition of these journals as critical media of knowledge, as specific supports for the elaboration, the circulation and the ap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Franck, Caroline Glorie, Alain Loute
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: ENS Éditions 2019-06-01
Series:Tracés
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/traces/9145
id doaj-da30e7be55a74d7ab10211d73855b747
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da30e7be55a74d7ab10211d73855b7472020-11-25T02:11:05ZfraENS ÉditionsTracés1763-00611963-18122019-06-0112713710.4000/traces.9145Repenser l’héritage critique des revuesThomas FranckCaroline GlorieAlain LouteThis paper starts from the ambivalent relation that links researchers and intellectual journals during the twentieth and the twenty-first centuries. After questioning the definition of these journals as critical media of knowledge, as specific supports for the elaboration, the circulation and the appropriation of critical theories, we will focus on the meaning of this ambivalence. The first ambivalence analysed is the one that links intellectual journals from the years 30’s to 60’s that assume a critical perspective and the cultural industry (Kulturindustrie). In the continuity of this investigation, we will try to understand how to think today this relation to intellectual journals. Does this apparent ambivalence prevent the production of critical knowledges? Due to the inherent complexity and the contradictive substance of intellectual journals, our perspective gives rise to an interest for the notion of inheritance: how could we inherit, as researchers in Humanities and as journal producers, these fundamental contradictions ? We will suggest, as last questioning, some critical commentaries, on the one hand, about the work produced by the Groupe de recherches matérialistes (GRM) in relation with problematic inheritances – the inheritance of intellectual journals and the inheritance of heterodox marxisms –, and, on the other hand, about the form that has to be developed by an intellectual journal todayhttp://journals.openedition.org/traces/9145journalinheritancecultural industryHeterodox MarxismFranco-German exchangespower
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Franck
Caroline Glorie
Alain Loute
spellingShingle Thomas Franck
Caroline Glorie
Alain Loute
Repenser l’héritage critique des revues
Tracés
journal
inheritance
cultural industry
Heterodox Marxism
Franco-German exchanges
power
author_facet Thomas Franck
Caroline Glorie
Alain Loute
author_sort Thomas Franck
title Repenser l’héritage critique des revues
title_short Repenser l’héritage critique des revues
title_full Repenser l’héritage critique des revues
title_fullStr Repenser l’héritage critique des revues
title_full_unstemmed Repenser l’héritage critique des revues
title_sort repenser l’héritage critique des revues
publisher ENS Éditions
series Tracés
issn 1763-0061
1963-1812
publishDate 2019-06-01
description This paper starts from the ambivalent relation that links researchers and intellectual journals during the twentieth and the twenty-first centuries. After questioning the definition of these journals as critical media of knowledge, as specific supports for the elaboration, the circulation and the appropriation of critical theories, we will focus on the meaning of this ambivalence. The first ambivalence analysed is the one that links intellectual journals from the years 30’s to 60’s that assume a critical perspective and the cultural industry (Kulturindustrie). In the continuity of this investigation, we will try to understand how to think today this relation to intellectual journals. Does this apparent ambivalence prevent the production of critical knowledges? Due to the inherent complexity and the contradictive substance of intellectual journals, our perspective gives rise to an interest for the notion of inheritance: how could we inherit, as researchers in Humanities and as journal producers, these fundamental contradictions ? We will suggest, as last questioning, some critical commentaries, on the one hand, about the work produced by the Groupe de recherches matérialistes (GRM) in relation with problematic inheritances – the inheritance of intellectual journals and the inheritance of heterodox marxisms –, and, on the other hand, about the form that has to be developed by an intellectual journal today
topic journal
inheritance
cultural industry
Heterodox Marxism
Franco-German exchanges
power
url http://journals.openedition.org/traces/9145
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasfranck repenserlheritagecritiquedesrevues
AT carolineglorie repenserlheritagecritiquedesrevues
AT alainloute repenserlheritagecritiquedesrevues
_version_ 1724916439843864576